生物技术能否引领可持续发展的制药业?

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Current opinion in biotechnology Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103100
Deniz Etit , Samir Meramo , Ólafur Ögmundarson , Michael K Jensen , Sumesh Sukumara
{"title":"生物技术能否引领可持续发展的制药业?","authors":"Deniz Etit ,&nbsp;Samir Meramo ,&nbsp;Ólafur Ögmundarson ,&nbsp;Michael K Jensen ,&nbsp;Sumesh Sukumara","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact-intensive and rapidly growing pharmaceutical industry must ensure its sustainability. This study reveals that environmental sustainability assessments have been conducted for only around 0.2% of pharmaceuticals, environmental impacts have significant variations among the assessed products, and different impact categories have not been consistently studied. Highly varied impacts require assessing more products to understand the industry’s sustainability status. Reporting all impact categories will be crucial, especially when comparing production technologies. Biological production of (semi)synthetic pharmaceuticals could reduce their environmental costs, though the high impacts of biologically produced monoclonal antibodies should also be optimized. Considering the sustainability potential of biopharmaceuticals from economic, environmental, and social perspectives, collaboratively guiding their immense market growth would lead to the industry’s sustainability transition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10833,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in biotechnology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103100"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000363/pdfft?md5=ccbee52c8c9b397e856b743162c8c4d5&pid=1-s2.0-S0958166924000363-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can biotechnology lead the way toward a sustainable pharmaceutical industry?\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Etit ,&nbsp;Samir Meramo ,&nbsp;Ólafur Ögmundarson ,&nbsp;Michael K Jensen ,&nbsp;Sumesh Sukumara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The impact-intensive and rapidly growing pharmaceutical industry must ensure its sustainability. This study reveals that environmental sustainability assessments have been conducted for only around 0.2% of pharmaceuticals, environmental impacts have significant variations among the assessed products, and different impact categories have not been consistently studied. Highly varied impacts require assessing more products to understand the industry’s sustainability status. Reporting all impact categories will be crucial, especially when comparing production technologies. Biological production of (semi)synthetic pharmaceuticals could reduce their environmental costs, though the high impacts of biologically produced monoclonal antibodies should also be optimized. Considering the sustainability potential of biopharmaceuticals from economic, environmental, and social perspectives, collaboratively guiding their immense market growth would lead to the industry’s sustainability transition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000363/pdfft?md5=ccbee52c8c9b397e856b743162c8c4d5&pid=1-s2.0-S0958166924000363-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000363\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制药业是影响密集型行业,发展迅速,必须确保其可持续发展。本研究显示,仅对约 0.2% 的制药产品进行了环境可持续性评估,被评估产品对环境的影响差异很大,对不同影响类别的研究也不一致。要了解该行业的可持续发展状况,就需要对更多产品进行评估。报告所有影响类别至关重要,尤其是在比较生产技术时。生物生产(半)合成药物可降低其环境成本,但生物生产单克隆抗体的高影响也应得到优化。从经济、环境和社会角度考虑生物制药的可持续发展潜力,共同引导其巨大的市场增长,将有助于该行业的可持续发展转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can biotechnology lead the way toward a sustainable pharmaceutical industry?

The impact-intensive and rapidly growing pharmaceutical industry must ensure its sustainability. This study reveals that environmental sustainability assessments have been conducted for only around 0.2% of pharmaceuticals, environmental impacts have significant variations among the assessed products, and different impact categories have not been consistently studied. Highly varied impacts require assessing more products to understand the industry’s sustainability status. Reporting all impact categories will be crucial, especially when comparing production technologies. Biological production of (semi)synthetic pharmaceuticals could reduce their environmental costs, though the high impacts of biologically produced monoclonal antibodies should also be optimized. Considering the sustainability potential of biopharmaceuticals from economic, environmental, and social perspectives, collaboratively guiding their immense market growth would lead to the industry’s sustainability transition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in biotechnology
Current opinion in biotechnology 工程技术-生化研究方法
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) is renowned for publishing authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. By offering clear and readable syntheses of current advances in biotechnology, COBIOT assists specialists in staying updated on the latest developments in the field. Expert authors annotate the most noteworthy papers from the vast array of information available today, providing readers with valuable insights and saving them time. As part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals, COBIOT is accompanied by the open-access primary research journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). Leveraging the editorial excellence, high impact, and global reach of the Current Opinion legacy, CO+RE journals ensure they are widely read resources integral to scientists' workflows. COBIOT is organized into themed sections, each reviewed once a year. These themes cover various areas of biotechnology, including analytical biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, energy biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, systems biology, nanobiotechnology, tissue, cell, and pathway engineering, chemical biotechnology, and pharmaceutical biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Toward a circular nitrogen bioeconomy: integrating nitrogen bioconcentration, separations, and high-value products for nitrogen recovery Tissue engineering in the agri-food industry: current status, socio-economic overview and regulatory compliance A biotechnological perspective on sand filtration for drinking water production National phosphorus planning for food and environmental security Engineering next-generation chimeric antigen receptor-T cells: recent breakthroughs and remaining challenges in design and screening of novel chimeric antigen receptor variants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1