对部分业余雨量计测量质量的评估

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Meteorologische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1127/metz/2024/1199
Grzegorz Urban, Michał K. Kowalewski, Jakub Sawicki, Krzysztof Borowiecki
{"title":"对部分业余雨量计测量质量的评估","authors":"Grzegorz Urban, Michał K. Kowalewski, Jakub Sawicki, Krzysztof Borowiecki","doi":"10.1127/metz/2024/1199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the Polish Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute (the Polish acronym: IMGW-PIB), experimental parallel measurements of daily precipitation totals were carried out from August 2021 – September 2022. Measurements were made with 5 types of amateur rain gauges (A – CliMET CM1016; B – TFA Dostmann 47.1008; C – TFA Dostmann 47.1000; D – Davis 6466 AeroCone Rain Collector; E – TFA Dostmann 47.3005.01) and a manual Hellmann rain gauge (H), which was taken as reference. The results showed that the most frequent differences in the rain gauges tested are very small differences (in daily rainfall totals Δ≤0.1 mm). They account for 63–86% of the days. On the other hand, large (1.0<Δ≤5.0 mm) and very large (Δ>5.0 mm) differences are most frequent in type D, respectively: 12% and 5% of days. This type, as the only one of the tested types, is characterised by the occurrence of days with very large differences with respect to rain gauge H. The tested rain gauges of the same type do not show the same sign of difference with respect to the reference rain gauge, as there are both negative and positive differences. The C type rain gauge shows the smallest average difference of daily precipitation totals against the H-type rain gauge (+0.04 mm). On the other hand, the average differences for types A and B are negative and amount to –0.1 and –0.2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the average difference for type D is +0.2 mm. Some amateur rain gauges perform better or similar to operationally used rain gauges of automatic networks. Types A, C and B can be used in voluntary networks with appropriate and continuous human supervision and their results used, as an additional source of information, for operational purposes at IMGW-PIB or other hydrological and meteorological services. The rain gauge D is useful only during warm season. Type E was not suitable for the conditions of the experiment for technical reasons.","PeriodicalId":49824,"journal":{"name":"Meteorologische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the quality of measurements from selected amateur rain gauges\",\"authors\":\"Grzegorz Urban, Michał K. Kowalewski, Jakub Sawicki, Krzysztof Borowiecki\",\"doi\":\"10.1127/metz/2024/1199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the Polish Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute (the Polish acronym: IMGW-PIB), experimental parallel measurements of daily precipitation totals were carried out from August 2021 – September 2022. Measurements were made with 5 types of amateur rain gauges (A – CliMET CM1016; B – TFA Dostmann 47.1008; C – TFA Dostmann 47.1000; D – Davis 6466 AeroCone Rain Collector; E – TFA Dostmann 47.3005.01) and a manual Hellmann rain gauge (H), which was taken as reference. The results showed that the most frequent differences in the rain gauges tested are very small differences (in daily rainfall totals Δ≤0.1 mm). They account for 63–86% of the days. On the other hand, large (1.0<Δ≤5.0 mm) and very large (Δ>5.0 mm) differences are most frequent in type D, respectively: 12% and 5% of days. This type, as the only one of the tested types, is characterised by the occurrence of days with very large differences with respect to rain gauge H. The tested rain gauges of the same type do not show the same sign of difference with respect to the reference rain gauge, as there are both negative and positive differences. The C type rain gauge shows the smallest average difference of daily precipitation totals against the H-type rain gauge (+0.04 mm). On the other hand, the average differences for types A and B are negative and amount to –0.1 and –0.2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the average difference for type D is +0.2 mm. Some amateur rain gauges perform better or similar to operationally used rain gauges of automatic networks. Types A, C and B can be used in voluntary networks with appropriate and continuous human supervision and their results used, as an additional source of information, for operational purposes at IMGW-PIB or other hydrological and meteorological services. The rain gauge D is useful only during warm season. Type E was not suitable for the conditions of the experiment for technical reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorologische Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorologische Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2024/1199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorologische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2024/1199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月期间,波兰气象和水资源管理研究所--国家研究所(波兰语缩写:IMGW-PIB)对每日降水总量进行了平行实验测量。测量使用了 5 种业余雨量计(A - CliMET CM1016;B - TFA Dostmann 47.1008;C - TFA Dostmann 47.1000;D - Davis 6466 AeroCone 雨量收集器;E - TFA Dostmann 47.3005.01)和作为参考的手动赫尔曼雨量计(H)。结果表明,所测试的雨量计中最常见的差异是非常小的差异(日降雨总量 Δ≤0.1 毫米)。它们占了天数的 63-86%。另一方面,大差异(1.0<Δ≤5.0 毫米)和超大差异(Δ>5.0 毫米)在 D 型中最为常见,分别占 12% 和 5%:12%和 5%。同类型雨量计与参考雨量计之间的差值符号不尽相同,既有负差,也有正差。C 型雨量计与 H 型雨量计的日降水总量平均差异最小(+0.04 毫米)。另一方面,A 型和 B 型雨量计的平均差异为负值,分别为-0.1 毫米和-0.2 毫米。相比之下,D 型雨量计的平均差值为 +0.2 毫米。一些业余雨量计的性能优于或类似于实际使用的自动网络雨量计。A 型、C 型和 B 型雨量计可在适当和持续的人工监督下在自愿网络中使用,其结果可作为 IMGW-PIB 或其他水文和气象服务机构业务目的的额外信息来源。D 型雨量计仅在暖季有用。由于技术原因,E 型雨量计不适合试验条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the quality of measurements from selected amateur rain gauges
At the Polish Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute (the Polish acronym: IMGW-PIB), experimental parallel measurements of daily precipitation totals were carried out from August 2021 – September 2022. Measurements were made with 5 types of amateur rain gauges (A – CliMET CM1016; B – TFA Dostmann 47.1008; C – TFA Dostmann 47.1000; D – Davis 6466 AeroCone Rain Collector; E – TFA Dostmann 47.3005.01) and a manual Hellmann rain gauge (H), which was taken as reference. The results showed that the most frequent differences in the rain gauges tested are very small differences (in daily rainfall totals Δ≤0.1 mm). They account for 63–86% of the days. On the other hand, large (1.0<Δ≤5.0 mm) and very large (Δ>5.0 mm) differences are most frequent in type D, respectively: 12% and 5% of days. This type, as the only one of the tested types, is characterised by the occurrence of days with very large differences with respect to rain gauge H. The tested rain gauges of the same type do not show the same sign of difference with respect to the reference rain gauge, as there are both negative and positive differences. The C type rain gauge shows the smallest average difference of daily precipitation totals against the H-type rain gauge (+0.04 mm). On the other hand, the average differences for types A and B are negative and amount to –0.1 and –0.2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the average difference for type D is +0.2 mm. Some amateur rain gauges perform better or similar to operationally used rain gauges of automatic networks. Types A, C and B can be used in voluntary networks with appropriate and continuous human supervision and their results used, as an additional source of information, for operational purposes at IMGW-PIB or other hydrological and meteorological services. The rain gauge D is useful only during warm season. Type E was not suitable for the conditions of the experiment for technical reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Meteorologische Zeitschrift 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Contributions to Atmospheric Sciences) accepts high-quality, English language, double peer-reviewed manuscripts on all aspects of observational, theoretical and computational research on the entire field of meteorology and atmospheric physics, including climatology. Manuscripts from applied sectors such as, e.g., Environmental Meteorology or Energy Meteorology are particularly welcome. Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Contributions to Atmospheric Sciences) represents a natural forum for the meteorological community of Central Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
High-resolution ensemble LES energy balance closure study of the LITFASS-2003 campaign Exploring the ability of regional extrapolation for precipitation nowcasting with deep learning Characteristics of rain cells over the northwest Pacific warm pool Observations and forecasting of a low visibility event in Hong Kong on New Year’s Eve Effect of volcanic sulfur dioxide on solar UV irradiance during the 2023 Fagradalsfjall eruption in Reykjavík, Iceland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1