评估神经反射激活作为细颗粒物对呼吸和心血管影响的潜在作用模式。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY Inhalation Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1080/08958378.2024.2324033
Robyn L Prueitt, Cassandra J Meakin, Nicholas L Drury, Julie E Goodman
{"title":"评估神经反射激活作为细颗粒物对呼吸和心血管影响的潜在作用模式。","authors":"Robyn L Prueitt, Cassandra J Meakin, Nicholas L Drury, Julie E Goodman","doi":"10.1080/08958378.2024.2324033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular health conditions contributes largely to the total mortality that has been associated with exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> in epidemiology studies. A mode of action (MoA) for these underlying morbidities has not been established, but it has been proposed that some effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> occur through activation of neural reflexes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We critically reviewed the experimental studies of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (including ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>, diesel exhaust particles, concentrated ambient particles, diesel exhaust, and cigarette smoke) and neural reflex activation, and applied the principles of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) MoA/human relevance framework to assess whether they support a biologically plausible and human-relevant MoA by which PM<sub>2.5</sub> could contribute to cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. We also considered whether the evidence from these studies supports a non-threshold MoA that operates at low, human-relevant PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>We found that the proposed MoA of neural reflex activation is biologically plausible for PM<sub>2.5</sub>-induced respiratory effects at high exposure levels used in experimental studies, but further studies are needed to fill important data gaps regarding the relevance of this MoA to humans at lower PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure levels. A role for the proposed MoA in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-induced cardiovascular effects is plausible for some effects but not others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are needed to determine whether neural reflex activation is the MoA by which PM<sub>2.5</sub> could cause either respiratory or cardiovascular morbidities in humans, particularly at the ambient concentrations associated with total mortality in epidemiology studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13561,"journal":{"name":"Inhalation Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of neural reflex activation as a potential mode of action for respiratory and cardiovascular effects of fine particulate matter.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn L Prueitt, Cassandra J Meakin, Nicholas L Drury, Julie E Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08958378.2024.2324033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular health conditions contributes largely to the total mortality that has been associated with exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> in epidemiology studies. A mode of action (MoA) for these underlying morbidities has not been established, but it has been proposed that some effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> occur through activation of neural reflexes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We critically reviewed the experimental studies of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (including ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub>, diesel exhaust particles, concentrated ambient particles, diesel exhaust, and cigarette smoke) and neural reflex activation, and applied the principles of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) MoA/human relevance framework to assess whether they support a biologically plausible and human-relevant MoA by which PM<sub>2.5</sub> could contribute to cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. We also considered whether the evidence from these studies supports a non-threshold MoA that operates at low, human-relevant PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>We found that the proposed MoA of neural reflex activation is biologically plausible for PM<sub>2.5</sub>-induced respiratory effects at high exposure levels used in experimental studies, but further studies are needed to fill important data gaps regarding the relevance of this MoA to humans at lower PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure levels. A role for the proposed MoA in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-induced cardiovascular effects is plausible for some effects but not others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are needed to determine whether neural reflex activation is the MoA by which PM<sub>2.5</sub> could cause either respiratory or cardiovascular morbidities in humans, particularly at the ambient concentrations associated with total mortality in epidemiology studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inhalation Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2024.2324033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inhalation Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2024.2324033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在流行病学研究中,与暴露于 PM2.5 相关的总死亡率中,呼吸系统和心血管健康状况导致的死亡率占很大比例。这些潜在疾病的作用模式(MoA)尚未确定,但有人提出,PM2.5 的某些效应是通过激活神经反射产生的:我们严格审查了有关 PM2.5(包括环境 PM2.5、柴油机废气颗粒、环境浓缩颗粒、柴油机废气和香烟烟雾)和神经反射激活的实验研究,并应用了国际化学品安全计划(IPCS)"行为准则/人类相关性 "框架的原则,以评估这些研究是否支持 PM2.5 可能导致心血管和呼吸系统死因的生物学上合理且与人类相关的行为准则。我们还考虑了这些研究的证据是否支持在较低的、与人类相关的PM2.5暴露浓度下的非阈值效应:我们发现,在实验研究中使用的高暴露水平下,所提出的神经反射激活作用机制对PM2.5诱发的呼吸系统效应在生物学上是可信的,但在较低的PM2.5暴露水平下,这一机制与人类的相关性方面,还需要进一步的研究来填补重要的数据缺口。在PM2.5诱发的心血管效应中,拟议的MoA在某些效应中的作用是可信的,但在其他效应中则不然:需要进一步研究,以确定神经反射激活是否是 PM2.5 可能导致人类呼吸系统或心血管疾病的作用机制,特别是在流行病学研究中与总死亡率相关的环境浓度下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of neural reflex activation as a potential mode of action for respiratory and cardiovascular effects of fine particulate matter.

Objectives: Mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular health conditions contributes largely to the total mortality that has been associated with exposure to PM2.5 in epidemiology studies. A mode of action (MoA) for these underlying morbidities has not been established, but it has been proposed that some effects of PM2.5 occur through activation of neural reflexes.

Materials and methods: We critically reviewed the experimental studies of PM2.5 (including ambient PM2.5, diesel exhaust particles, concentrated ambient particles, diesel exhaust, and cigarette smoke) and neural reflex activation, and applied the principles of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) MoA/human relevance framework to assess whether they support a biologically plausible and human-relevant MoA by which PM2.5 could contribute to cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. We also considered whether the evidence from these studies supports a non-threshold MoA that operates at low, human-relevant PM2.5 exposure concentrations.

Results and discussion: We found that the proposed MoA of neural reflex activation is biologically plausible for PM2.5-induced respiratory effects at high exposure levels used in experimental studies, but further studies are needed to fill important data gaps regarding the relevance of this MoA to humans at lower PM2.5 exposure levels. A role for the proposed MoA in PM2.5-induced cardiovascular effects is plausible for some effects but not others.

Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine whether neural reflex activation is the MoA by which PM2.5 could cause either respiratory or cardiovascular morbidities in humans, particularly at the ambient concentrations associated with total mortality in epidemiology studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inhalation Toxicology
Inhalation Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Inhalation Toxicology is a peer-reviewed publication providing a key forum for the latest accomplishments and advancements in concepts, approaches, and procedures presently being used to evaluate the health risk associated with airborne chemicals. The journal publishes original research, reviews, symposia, and workshop topics involving the respiratory system’s functions in health and disease, the pathogenesis and mechanism of injury, the extrapolation of animal data to humans, the effects of inhaled substances on extra-pulmonary systems, as well as reliable and innovative models for predicting human disease.
期刊最新文献
Gene expression changes in mouse lung induced by subacute inhalation of PM10-rich particulate matter. A mouse model of wildfire smoke-induced health effects: sex differences in acute and sustained effects of inhalation exposures. The effect of enriched versus depleted housing on eucalyptus smoke-induced cardiovascular dysfunction in mice. The fate of an inhaled cigarette puff in the human respiratory tract. Evaluation of airborne asbestos concentrations associated with the maintenance of brakes on an industrial overhead crane.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1