比较接受瑞马唑仑和异丙酚全身麻醉的患者的双光谱指数:随机交叉试验。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101377
Chen Yang , Jing Jiao , Yuyan Nie , Wenyu Shao , Hongwei Zhang , Shaoqiang Huang
{"title":"比较接受瑞马唑仑和异丙酚全身麻醉的患者的双光谱指数:随机交叉试验。","authors":"Chen Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Jiao ,&nbsp;Yuyan Nie ,&nbsp;Wenyu Shao ,&nbsp;Hongwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaoqiang Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remimazolam is a safe and effective new benzodiazepine sedative that has unique advantages in anesthesia induction and maintenance. The differences in the electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) during general anesthesia between propofol and remimazolam deserve further exploration.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center randomized crossover study. Patients who required multiple hysteroscopic surgery were randomly assigned to use remimazolam (0.27 mg/kg for induction and 1 mg/kg/h for maintenance) first and then propofol (2.0 mg/kg for induction and 6 mg/kg/h for maintenance) during hysteroscopic surgery again 3 months later, or in the opposite order. Both drugs were used at the latest ED<sub>95</sub> for unconsciousness. The BIS values (primary endpoint), intraoperative conditions, and incidence of adverse reactions (secondary endpoints) were compared at each time point. BIS values were analyzed with a mixed model of repeated measurements (MMRM).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen patients completed the study. The lowest BIS value in the remimazolam regimen was significantly higher than that in the propofol regimen (<em>p</em> = 0.001). The MMRM analysis of the BIS values revealed significant differences between the regimens at each time point (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The intraoperative diastolic blood pressure and heart rate changes were smaller, the recovery was faster, and there were fewer adverse reactions and less injection pain, but a greater incidence of intraoperative body movement and hiccups, in the remimazolam regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The trial indicated that remimazolam maintained a higher BIS level than propofol. The correlation between the BIS and the depth of anesthesia induced by remimazolam needs to be further studied.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200064551</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the bispectral indices of patients receiving remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia: a randomized crossover trial\",\"authors\":\"Chen Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Jiao ,&nbsp;Yuyan Nie ,&nbsp;Wenyu Shao ,&nbsp;Hongwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaoqiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Remimazolam is a safe and effective new benzodiazepine sedative that has unique advantages in anesthesia induction and maintenance. The differences in the electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) during general anesthesia between propofol and remimazolam deserve further exploration.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center randomized crossover study. Patients who required multiple hysteroscopic surgery were randomly assigned to use remimazolam (0.27 mg/kg for induction and 1 mg/kg/h for maintenance) first and then propofol (2.0 mg/kg for induction and 6 mg/kg/h for maintenance) during hysteroscopic surgery again 3 months later, or in the opposite order. Both drugs were used at the latest ED<sub>95</sub> for unconsciousness. The BIS values (primary endpoint), intraoperative conditions, and incidence of adverse reactions (secondary endpoints) were compared at each time point. BIS values were analyzed with a mixed model of repeated measurements (MMRM).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen patients completed the study. The lowest BIS value in the remimazolam regimen was significantly higher than that in the propofol regimen (<em>p</em> = 0.001). The MMRM analysis of the BIS values revealed significant differences between the regimens at each time point (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The intraoperative diastolic blood pressure and heart rate changes were smaller, the recovery was faster, and there were fewer adverse reactions and less injection pain, but a greater incidence of intraoperative body movement and hiccups, in the remimazolam regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The trial indicated that remimazolam maintained a higher BIS level than propofol. The correlation between the BIS and the depth of anesthesia induced by remimazolam needs to be further studied.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200064551</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:雷马唑仑是一种安全有效的新型苯二氮卓镇静剂,在麻醉诱导和维持中具有独特的优势。丙泊酚和雷马唑仑在全身麻醉期间脑电图双谱指数(BIS)的差异值得进一步探讨:方法:单中心随机交叉研究。需要多次接受宫腔镜手术的患者被随机分配到先使用瑞马唑仑(0.27 mg/kg 用于诱导,1 mg/kg/h 用于维持),然后在 3 个月后再次接受宫腔镜手术时使用异丙酚(2.0 mg/kg 用于诱导,6 mg/kg/h 用于维持),或者使用相反的顺序。两种药物的使用剂量均为昏迷的最新 ED95。比较了每个时间点的 BIS 值(主要终点)、术中情况和不良反应发生率(次要终点)。BIS 值采用重复测量混合模型(MMRM)进行分析:17名患者完成了研究。瑞马唑仑方案的最低 BIS 值明显高于异丙酚方案(p = 0.001)。对 BIS 值进行的 MMRM 分析表明,各时间点的方案之间存在显著差异(p 结论:BIS 值与异丙酚方案之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001):试验表明,与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑能维持更高的 BIS 水平。BIS与雷马唑仑诱导的麻醉深度之间的相关性有待进一步研究:本试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册:ChiCTR2200064551。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the bispectral indices of patients receiving remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia: a randomized crossover trial

Background

Remimazolam is a safe and effective new benzodiazepine sedative that has unique advantages in anesthesia induction and maintenance. The differences in the electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) during general anesthesia between propofol and remimazolam deserve further exploration.

Methods

Single-center randomized crossover study. Patients who required multiple hysteroscopic surgery were randomly assigned to use remimazolam (0.27 mg/kg for induction and 1 mg/kg/h for maintenance) first and then propofol (2.0 mg/kg for induction and 6 mg/kg/h for maintenance) during hysteroscopic surgery again 3 months later, or in the opposite order. Both drugs were used at the latest ED95 for unconsciousness. The BIS values (primary endpoint), intraoperative conditions, and incidence of adverse reactions (secondary endpoints) were compared at each time point. BIS values were analyzed with a mixed model of repeated measurements (MMRM).

Results

Seventeen patients completed the study. The lowest BIS value in the remimazolam regimen was significantly higher than that in the propofol regimen (p = 0.001). The MMRM analysis of the BIS values revealed significant differences between the regimens at each time point (p < 0.001). The intraoperative diastolic blood pressure and heart rate changes were smaller, the recovery was faster, and there were fewer adverse reactions and less injection pain, but a greater incidence of intraoperative body movement and hiccups, in the remimazolam regimen.

Conclusion

The trial indicated that remimazolam maintained a higher BIS level than propofol. The correlation between the BIS and the depth of anesthesia induced by remimazolam needs to be further studied.

Trial registration

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200064551

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Severe acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study: Kidney Injury Working Initiative in Critically ill eurOpean patients during Coronavirus Outbreak (KIWI COCO study). Editorial board Contents The association between neuraxial labor analgesia and subacute pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1