测量含碳酸盐土壤中有机碳含量的方法:综述

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Eurasian Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1134/s1064229323603104
E. V. Shamrikova, E. V. Vanchikova, E. V. Kyzyurova, E. V. Zhangurov
{"title":"测量含碳酸盐土壤中有机碳含量的方法:综述","authors":"E. V. Shamrikova, E. V. Vanchikova, E. V. Kyzyurova, E. V. Zhangurov","doi":"10.1134/s1064229323603104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>In the world practice, the organic carbon content (C<sub>org</sub>) in the soils containing carbonates is measured in different ways. We have analyzed the methods for solving this problem including the state-of-the-art approaches, such as thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, and spectroscopy. As is shown, the presence of CaCO<sub>3</sub> does not prevent the C<sub>org</sub> measurement with dichromatometric method (Tyurin and Walkley–Black variants). The disadvantages of this method comprise the laborious analysis, constant presence of operator, incomplete oxidation of organic compounds, and environmental pollution. The measurement of soil weight loss-on-ignition (LOI) is economical and rapid but overestimates C<sub>org</sub> content because of inadequacy of the conversion factor of 1.724, the presence of adsorbed and chemically bound water, as well as mineral components decomposing at <i>T</i> = 105–550°C. The most relevant solution for assaying the C<sub>org</sub> content in carbonate soils is to use an analyzer and a calcimeter although the accuracy of C<sub>org</sub> measurements in the presence of carbonates is significantly reduced because the errors of two methods are quadratically summed. A high cost of the device, maintenance, verification, and repair limit its widespread use in soil laboratories. The content of soil carbonates can be measured using both gravimetric (LOI) and volumetric (calcimeter) methods. The latter method is preferable for the soils with the prevalence of CaCO<sub>3</sub> in carbonates. The preliminary removal of carbonates from soil samples is labor-intensive and can cause a partial loss of C<sub>org</sub> via acid extraction. A high cost of the instruments and the absence of the libraries of soil spectra hinder the development of Vis-NIR and MIR spectroscopy as an alternative to wet chemistry methods. Further comparative studies will give a deeper insight into the spatial patterns in the distribution of soil organic carbon.</p>","PeriodicalId":11892,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Soil Science","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Measuring Organic Carbon Content in Carbonate-Containing Soils: A Review\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Shamrikova, E. V. Vanchikova, E. V. Kyzyurova, E. V. Zhangurov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s1064229323603104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>In the world practice, the organic carbon content (C<sub>org</sub>) in the soils containing carbonates is measured in different ways. We have analyzed the methods for solving this problem including the state-of-the-art approaches, such as thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, and spectroscopy. As is shown, the presence of CaCO<sub>3</sub> does not prevent the C<sub>org</sub> measurement with dichromatometric method (Tyurin and Walkley–Black variants). The disadvantages of this method comprise the laborious analysis, constant presence of operator, incomplete oxidation of organic compounds, and environmental pollution. The measurement of soil weight loss-on-ignition (LOI) is economical and rapid but overestimates C<sub>org</sub> content because of inadequacy of the conversion factor of 1.724, the presence of adsorbed and chemically bound water, as well as mineral components decomposing at <i>T</i> = 105–550°C. The most relevant solution for assaying the C<sub>org</sub> content in carbonate soils is to use an analyzer and a calcimeter although the accuracy of C<sub>org</sub> measurements in the presence of carbonates is significantly reduced because the errors of two methods are quadratically summed. A high cost of the device, maintenance, verification, and repair limit its widespread use in soil laboratories. The content of soil carbonates can be measured using both gravimetric (LOI) and volumetric (calcimeter) methods. The latter method is preferable for the soils with the prevalence of CaCO<sub>3</sub> in carbonates. The preliminary removal of carbonates from soil samples is labor-intensive and can cause a partial loss of C<sub>org</sub> via acid extraction. A high cost of the instruments and the absence of the libraries of soil spectra hinder the development of Vis-NIR and MIR spectroscopy as an alternative to wet chemistry methods. Further comparative studies will give a deeper insight into the spatial patterns in the distribution of soil organic carbon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229323603104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229323603104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在世界范围内,测量含碳酸盐土壤中有机碳含量(Corg)的方法多种多样。我们分析了解决这一问题的方法,包括热重法、差示扫描量热法和光谱法等最先进的方法。如图所示,CaCO3 的存在并不妨碍使用二色法(Tyurin 和 Walkley-Black 变体)测量 Corg。这种方法的缺点包括分析费力、操作人员经常在场、有机化合物氧化不完全以及环境污染。测量土壤的点火失重(LOI)既经济又快速,但由于 1.724 的换算系数不足、存在吸附水和化学结合水以及在 T = 105-550°C 下分解的矿物成分,会高估钙含量。测定碳酸盐土壤中 Corg 含量的最有效方法是使用分析仪和计算器,但在存在碳酸盐的情况下,Corg 测量的准确性会大大降低,因为两种方法的误差是二次相加的。该设备的高成本、维护、验证和维修限制了其在土壤实验室中的广泛使用。土壤中碳酸盐的含量可以用重量法(LOI)和体积法(钙化仪)来测量。对于碳酸盐中普遍含有 CaCO3 的土壤,后一种方法更为理想。从土壤样本中初步去除碳酸盐需要耗费大量人力物力,而且通过酸萃取可能会造成 Corg 的部分损失。高昂的仪器成本和缺乏土壤光谱库阻碍了可见近红外光谱和近红外光谱作为湿化学方法替代方法的发展。进一步的比较研究将有助于深入了解土壤有机碳的空间分布模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for Measuring Organic Carbon Content in Carbonate-Containing Soils: A Review

Abstract

In the world practice, the organic carbon content (Corg) in the soils containing carbonates is measured in different ways. We have analyzed the methods for solving this problem including the state-of-the-art approaches, such as thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, and spectroscopy. As is shown, the presence of CaCO3 does not prevent the Corg measurement with dichromatometric method (Tyurin and Walkley–Black variants). The disadvantages of this method comprise the laborious analysis, constant presence of operator, incomplete oxidation of organic compounds, and environmental pollution. The measurement of soil weight loss-on-ignition (LOI) is economical and rapid but overestimates Corg content because of inadequacy of the conversion factor of 1.724, the presence of adsorbed and chemically bound water, as well as mineral components decomposing at T = 105–550°C. The most relevant solution for assaying the Corg content in carbonate soils is to use an analyzer and a calcimeter although the accuracy of Corg measurements in the presence of carbonates is significantly reduced because the errors of two methods are quadratically summed. A high cost of the device, maintenance, verification, and repair limit its widespread use in soil laboratories. The content of soil carbonates can be measured using both gravimetric (LOI) and volumetric (calcimeter) methods. The latter method is preferable for the soils with the prevalence of CaCO3 in carbonates. The preliminary removal of carbonates from soil samples is labor-intensive and can cause a partial loss of Corg via acid extraction. A high cost of the instruments and the absence of the libraries of soil spectra hinder the development of Vis-NIR and MIR spectroscopy as an alternative to wet chemistry methods. Further comparative studies will give a deeper insight into the spatial patterns in the distribution of soil organic carbon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Soil Science
Eurasian Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurasian Soil Science publishes original research papers on global and regional studies discussing both theoretical and experimental problems of genesis, geography, physics, chemistry, biology, fertility, management, conservation, and remediation of soils. Special sections are devoted to current news in the life of the International and Russian soil science societies and to the history of soil sciences. Since 2000, the journal Agricultural Chemistry, the English version of the journal of the Russian Academy of Sciences Agrokhimiya, has been merged into the journal Eurasian Soil Science and is no longer published as a separate title.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Different Factors on the Assessment of Total Alkalinity of Soils on Calcareous Rocks Physically Based Thermodynamic Model of the Water Retention Curve of Soils for the Entire Water Range Erosion–Accumulative Soil Cover Patterns of Dry-Steppe Agrolandscape, Rostov Region Iron Compounds in Steppe Soils of the East-European Plain: Association with Soil Processes, Paleoclimatic Aspects Assessment of the Urban Soil-Plant System Based on Integral Indicators of Environment Pollution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1