界定气候变化带来的与流动性相关的严重风险

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Climate Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crm.2024.100601
Elisabeth A. Gilmore , David Wrathall , Helen Adams , Halvard Buhaug , Edwin Castellanos , Nathalie Hilmi , Robert McLeman , Chandni Singh , Ibidun Adelekan
{"title":"界定气候变化带来的与流动性相关的严重风险","authors":"Elisabeth A. Gilmore ,&nbsp;David Wrathall ,&nbsp;Helen Adams ,&nbsp;Halvard Buhaug ,&nbsp;Edwin Castellanos ,&nbsp;Nathalie Hilmi ,&nbsp;Robert McLeman ,&nbsp;Chandni Singh ,&nbsp;Ibidun Adelekan","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While migration is often conceptualized as an adaptive response to climate hazards, migration can also present severe risks to people on the move. In this paper, we attempt to operationalize the Representative Key Risks (RKR) framework of the Sixth Assessment Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for human mobility. First, we provide a framework for understanding how mobility risks emerge by engaging with the concept of habitability. We argue that uninhabitability occurs where the physical environment loses suitability and where there is a loss of agency in local populations. The severity of the risk from the loss of habitability is then represented by the high potential for human suffering. When climate hazards affect physical suitability and agency, the forms of migration that occur undermine human wellbeing and the right to self-determination: forced displacement, community relocation/resettlement, and involuntary immobility. Second, we show how such forms of mobility are more or less likely along different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). This paper asserts a central concern around human suffering to recentre scenario discourse on where, and how, adaptation, changes to development patterns, and government policies can reduce this suffering. Proactive governance at local, national, and international levels that attends to people’s adaptation and mobility needs can avert the more frequent emergence of severe risks related to mobility in a changing climate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000184/pdfft?md5=745667f4f3028f607e28db3a09ecc001&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096324000184-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining severe risks related to mobility from climate change\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth A. Gilmore ,&nbsp;David Wrathall ,&nbsp;Helen Adams ,&nbsp;Halvard Buhaug ,&nbsp;Edwin Castellanos ,&nbsp;Nathalie Hilmi ,&nbsp;Robert McLeman ,&nbsp;Chandni Singh ,&nbsp;Ibidun Adelekan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crm.2024.100601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While migration is often conceptualized as an adaptive response to climate hazards, migration can also present severe risks to people on the move. In this paper, we attempt to operationalize the Representative Key Risks (RKR) framework of the Sixth Assessment Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for human mobility. First, we provide a framework for understanding how mobility risks emerge by engaging with the concept of habitability. We argue that uninhabitability occurs where the physical environment loses suitability and where there is a loss of agency in local populations. The severity of the risk from the loss of habitability is then represented by the high potential for human suffering. When climate hazards affect physical suitability and agency, the forms of migration that occur undermine human wellbeing and the right to self-determination: forced displacement, community relocation/resettlement, and involuntary immobility. Second, we show how such forms of mobility are more or less likely along different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). This paper asserts a central concern around human suffering to recentre scenario discourse on where, and how, adaptation, changes to development patterns, and government policies can reduce this suffering. Proactive governance at local, national, and international levels that attends to people’s adaptation and mobility needs can avert the more frequent emergence of severe risks related to mobility in a changing climate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000184/pdfft?md5=745667f4f3028f607e28db3a09ecc001&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096324000184-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096324000184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然人们通常将迁徙视为对气候灾害的一种适应性反应,但迁徙也会给迁徙者带来严重的风险。在本文中,我们尝试将政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第二工作组第六次评估报告中的代表性关键风险(RKR)框架应用于人类流动。首先,我们提供了一个框架,通过可居住性的概念来理解流动性风险是如何出现的。我们认为,当自然环境失去适宜性,当地居民失去自主权时,就会出现不适宜居住的情况。丧失可居住性所带来的风险的严重性体现在人类遭受痛苦的可能性很高。当气候灾害影响到物质环境的适宜性和能动性时,就会出现损害人类福祉和自决权的迁移形式:被迫流离失所、社区搬迁/重新安置和非自愿流动。其次,我们说明了在不同的共享社会经济路径(SSPs)上,这些流动形式的可能性有大有小。本文围绕人类苦难展开中心讨论,探讨适应、发展模式的改变以及政府政策在哪些方面以及如何减少人类苦难。在地方、国家和国际层面上,关注人们的适应和流动性需求的积极治理可以避免在不断变化的气候中更频繁地出现与流动性相关的严重风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining severe risks related to mobility from climate change

While migration is often conceptualized as an adaptive response to climate hazards, migration can also present severe risks to people on the move. In this paper, we attempt to operationalize the Representative Key Risks (RKR) framework of the Sixth Assessment Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for human mobility. First, we provide a framework for understanding how mobility risks emerge by engaging with the concept of habitability. We argue that uninhabitability occurs where the physical environment loses suitability and where there is a loss of agency in local populations. The severity of the risk from the loss of habitability is then represented by the high potential for human suffering. When climate hazards affect physical suitability and agency, the forms of migration that occur undermine human wellbeing and the right to self-determination: forced displacement, community relocation/resettlement, and involuntary immobility. Second, we show how such forms of mobility are more or less likely along different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). This paper asserts a central concern around human suffering to recentre scenario discourse on where, and how, adaptation, changes to development patterns, and government policies can reduce this suffering. Proactive governance at local, national, and international levels that attends to people’s adaptation and mobility needs can avert the more frequent emergence of severe risks related to mobility in a changing climate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
期刊最新文献
Risk Governance of Climate-Related Hazards in Longyearbyen, Svalbard: A Review of Risk Governance Approaches and Knowledge Gaps Co-designing a just resilience balance scorecard with experts in islands and coastal cities Gender-based vulnerability and adaptive capacity in the disaster-prone coastal areas from an intersectionality perspective The impact of livelihood capitals on farmers’ adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices: Evidence from rice production in the Jianghan Plain, China Economic valuation of climate induced losses to aquaculture for evaluating climate information services in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1