S-1加奥沙利铂(S-1OX)与卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(CAPOX)治疗晚期胃癌:系统综述与荟萃分析

S.M.Zeeshan Qadar , Zhiyong Dong , Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam , Jianxue Wang , Xiling Xu , Fakhsheena Anjum , Sana Shamim , Bafreen Sherif , Sundas Ali
{"title":"S-1加奥沙利铂(S-1OX)与卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(CAPOX)治疗晚期胃癌:系统综述与荟萃分析","authors":"S.M.Zeeshan Qadar ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Dong ,&nbsp;Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam ,&nbsp;Jianxue Wang ,&nbsp;Xiling Xu ,&nbsp;Fakhsheena Anjum ,&nbsp;Sana Shamim ,&nbsp;Bafreen Sherif ,&nbsp;Sundas Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Several therapeutic combinations are available for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). It is unclear which combinations are most beneficial to the patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Tegafur/ gimeracil/ oteracil (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (S-1OX) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with AGC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Relevant randomized controlled trials were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), two major Chinese biomedical databases (CBM, CNKI), and registry centers until July 22, 2019, with no language restrictions. Data were extracted for overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival time (OST), and toxicity. The systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. RevMan 5.3.1 was used for statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 6 randomized controlled trials involving 911 patients were included. The quality of the trials was less than 3 points. All the trials demonstrated a significantly improved toxicity (hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy) in the S-1OX trials (p &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between S-1OX versus CAPOX in terms of ORR, OST, TTP. Any of the subgroup analyses did not exhibit heterogeneity, so the fixed-effects model be used to execute the subgroup meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both S-1OX and CAPOX showed similar efficacy for treatment of AGC. However, S1-OX appeared to present less toxicity in terms of hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy as compared to CAPOX.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000181/pdfft?md5=2f78d9ea45ec70c9d3f289f0aee582c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990024000181-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S-1 plus oxaloplatin (S-1OX) versus capecitabine plus oxaloplatin (CAPOX) for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"S.M.Zeeshan Qadar ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Dong ,&nbsp;Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam ,&nbsp;Jianxue Wang ,&nbsp;Xiling Xu ,&nbsp;Fakhsheena Anjum ,&nbsp;Sana Shamim ,&nbsp;Bafreen Sherif ,&nbsp;Sundas Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Several therapeutic combinations are available for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). It is unclear which combinations are most beneficial to the patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Tegafur/ gimeracil/ oteracil (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (S-1OX) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with AGC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Relevant randomized controlled trials were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), two major Chinese biomedical databases (CBM, CNKI), and registry centers until July 22, 2019, with no language restrictions. Data were extracted for overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival time (OST), and toxicity. The systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. RevMan 5.3.1 was used for statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 6 randomized controlled trials involving 911 patients were included. The quality of the trials was less than 3 points. All the trials demonstrated a significantly improved toxicity (hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy) in the S-1OX trials (p &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between S-1OX versus CAPOX in terms of ORR, OST, TTP. Any of the subgroup analyses did not exhibit heterogeneity, so the fixed-effects model be used to execute the subgroup meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both S-1OX and CAPOX showed similar efficacy for treatment of AGC. However, S1-OX appeared to present less toxicity in terms of hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy as compared to CAPOX.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000181/pdfft?md5=2f78d9ea45ec70c9d3f289f0aee582c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990024000181-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990024000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 目前有多种治疗组合可用于晚期胃癌(AGC)的治疗。目前尚不清楚哪种联合疗法对患者最有益。本研究旨在比较替加氟(Tegafur)/吉莫拉嘧啶(Gimeracil)/奥特拉西(Oteracil)(S-1)加奥沙利铂(S-1OX)与卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(CAPOX)对AGC患者的疗效和安全性。材料与方法截至2019年7月22日,在MEDLINE、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library(CENTRAL)、两大中文生物医学数据库(CBM、CNKI)和注册中心检索了相关随机对照试验,无语言限制。提取的数据包括总反应率(ORR)、进展时间(TTP)、总生存时间(OST)和毒性。系统综述根据 Cochrane 协作组织的建议进行。结果 共纳入了 6 项随机对照试验,涉及 911 名患者。试验质量低于 3 分。所有试验均显示,S-1OX 试验的毒性(手足综合征和神经病变)明显改善(p < 0.05)。在 ORR、OST 和 TTP 方面,S-1OX 与 CAPOX 之间的差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论S-1OX和CAPOX治疗AGC的疗效相似。然而,与 CAPOX 相比,S1-OX 在手足综合征和神经病变方面的毒性似乎更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
S-1 plus oxaloplatin (S-1OX) versus capecitabine plus oxaloplatin (CAPOX) for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Several therapeutic combinations are available for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). It is unclear which combinations are most beneficial to the patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Tegafur/ gimeracil/ oteracil (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (S-1OX) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with AGC.

Materials and Methods

Relevant randomized controlled trials were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), two major Chinese biomedical databases (CBM, CNKI), and registry centers until July 22, 2019, with no language restrictions. Data were extracted for overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival time (OST), and toxicity. The systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. RevMan 5.3.1 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 6 randomized controlled trials involving 911 patients were included. The quality of the trials was less than 3 points. All the trials demonstrated a significantly improved toxicity (hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy) in the S-1OX trials (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between S-1OX versus CAPOX in terms of ORR, OST, TTP. Any of the subgroup analyses did not exhibit heterogeneity, so the fixed-effects model be used to execute the subgroup meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Both S-1OX and CAPOX showed similar efficacy for treatment of AGC. However, S1-OX appeared to present less toxicity in terms of hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy as compared to CAPOX.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1