Dennis H. Li, Kathryn Macapagal, Melissa Mongrella, Rana Saber, Brian Mustanski
{"title":"\"您的包裹无法送达\":美国艾滋病数字化干预措施的实施现状","authors":"Dennis H. Li, Kathryn Macapagal, Melissa Mongrella, Rana Saber, Brian Mustanski","doi":"10.1007/s11904-024-00693-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Despite continuous innovations and federal investment to create digital interventions addressing the HIV prevention and care continua, these interventions have not reached people in the U.S. at scale. This article reviews what is known about U.S. implementation of digital HIV interventions and presents a strategy to cross the research-to-practice chasm for these types of interventions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>We conducted a narrative review of U.S.-based original research on implementation of digital HIV interventions and identified few studies reporting on implementation determinants, strategies, processes, or outcomes, particularly outside the context of effectiveness trials. To supplement the literature, in 2023, we surveyed 47 investigators representing 64 unique interventions about their experiences with implementation after their research trials. Respondents placed high importance on intervention implementation, but major barriers included lack of funding and clear implementation models, technology costs, and difficulty identifying partners equipped to deliver digital interventions. They felt that responsibility for implementation should be shared between intervention developers, deliverers (e.g., clinics), and a government entity. If an implementation center were to exist, most respondents wanted to be available for guidance or technical assistance but largely wanted less involvement.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Numerous evidence-based, effective digital interventions exist to address HIV prevention and care. However, they remain “on the shelf” absent a concrete and sustainable model for real-world dissemination and implementation. Based on our findings, we call for the creation of national implementation centers, analogous to those in other health systems, to facilitate digital HIV intervention delivery and accelerate progress toward ending the U.S. epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":10930,"journal":{"name":"Current HIV/AIDS Reports","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Your Package Could Not Be Delivered”: The State of Digital HIV Intervention Implementation in the US\",\"authors\":\"Dennis H. Li, Kathryn Macapagal, Melissa Mongrella, Rana Saber, Brian Mustanski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11904-024-00693-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>Despite continuous innovations and federal investment to create digital interventions addressing the HIV prevention and care continua, these interventions have not reached people in the U.S. at scale. This article reviews what is known about U.S. implementation of digital HIV interventions and presents a strategy to cross the research-to-practice chasm for these types of interventions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent Findings</h3><p>We conducted a narrative review of U.S.-based original research on implementation of digital HIV interventions and identified few studies reporting on implementation determinants, strategies, processes, or outcomes, particularly outside the context of effectiveness trials. To supplement the literature, in 2023, we surveyed 47 investigators representing 64 unique interventions about their experiences with implementation after their research trials. Respondents placed high importance on intervention implementation, but major barriers included lack of funding and clear implementation models, technology costs, and difficulty identifying partners equipped to deliver digital interventions. They felt that responsibility for implementation should be shared between intervention developers, deliverers (e.g., clinics), and a government entity. If an implementation center were to exist, most respondents wanted to be available for guidance or technical assistance but largely wanted less involvement.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>Numerous evidence-based, effective digital interventions exist to address HIV prevention and care. However, they remain “on the shelf” absent a concrete and sustainable model for real-world dissemination and implementation. Based on our findings, we call for the creation of national implementation centers, analogous to those in other health systems, to facilitate digital HIV intervention delivery and accelerate progress toward ending the U.S. epidemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current HIV/AIDS Reports\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current HIV/AIDS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-024-00693-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current HIV/AIDS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-024-00693-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
综述目的尽管不断进行创新和联邦投资,以创建解决艾滋病预防和护理连续性问题的数字化干预措施,但这些干预措施尚未大规模惠及美国民众。本文回顾了美国实施数字化 HIV 干预措施的情况,并提出了跨越此类干预措施从研究到实践的鸿沟的策略。最近的研究结果我们对美国实施数字化 HIV 干预措施的原始研究进行了叙述性回顾,发现很少有研究报告实施的决定因素、策略、过程或结果,尤其是在有效性试验之外。为了对文献进行补充,2023 年,我们调查了代表 64 项独特干预措施的 47 位调查者,了解他们在研究试验后的实施经验。受访者高度重视干预措施的实施,但主要障碍包括缺乏资金和明确的实施模式、技术成本以及难以找到具备实施数字干预措施能力的合作伙伴。他们认为,干预措施的实施责任应由干预措施开发者、实施者(如诊所)和政府实体共同承担。如果有一个实施中心,大多数受访者都希望该中心能够提供指导或技术援助,但大部分受访者都希望该中心的参与程度较低。然而,这些干预措施仍被 "束之高阁",缺乏具体、可持续的实际传播和实施模式。根据我们的研究结果,我们呼吁建立国家实施中心,类似于其他卫生系统的实施中心,以促进艾滋病数字化干预措施的实施,并加快终结美国艾滋病流行的进程。
“Your Package Could Not Be Delivered”: The State of Digital HIV Intervention Implementation in the US
Purpose of Review
Despite continuous innovations and federal investment to create digital interventions addressing the HIV prevention and care continua, these interventions have not reached people in the U.S. at scale. This article reviews what is known about U.S. implementation of digital HIV interventions and presents a strategy to cross the research-to-practice chasm for these types of interventions.
Recent Findings
We conducted a narrative review of U.S.-based original research on implementation of digital HIV interventions and identified few studies reporting on implementation determinants, strategies, processes, or outcomes, particularly outside the context of effectiveness trials. To supplement the literature, in 2023, we surveyed 47 investigators representing 64 unique interventions about their experiences with implementation after their research trials. Respondents placed high importance on intervention implementation, but major barriers included lack of funding and clear implementation models, technology costs, and difficulty identifying partners equipped to deliver digital interventions. They felt that responsibility for implementation should be shared between intervention developers, deliverers (e.g., clinics), and a government entity. If an implementation center were to exist, most respondents wanted to be available for guidance or technical assistance but largely wanted less involvement.
Summary
Numerous evidence-based, effective digital interventions exist to address HIV prevention and care. However, they remain “on the shelf” absent a concrete and sustainable model for real-world dissemination and implementation. Based on our findings, we call for the creation of national implementation centers, analogous to those in other health systems, to facilitate digital HIV intervention delivery and accelerate progress toward ending the U.S. epidemic.
期刊介绍:
This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of HIV/AIDS.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as antiretroviral therapies, behavioral aspects of management, and metabolic complications and comorbidity. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.