数字贸易中的规范创业:新加坡引领的数字贸易协定浪潮

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 ECONOMICS World Trade Review Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1017/s1474745624000089
Emily Jones, Beatriz Kira, Rutendo Tavengerwei
{"title":"数字贸易中的规范创业:新加坡引领的数字贸易协定浪潮","authors":"Emily Jones, Beatriz Kira, Rutendo Tavengerwei","doi":"10.1017/s1474745624000089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rulemaking in digital trade is proceeding apace. Many preferential trade agreements contain dedicated e-commerce or digital trade chapters and some states have entered into stand-alone digital economy agreements. This article seeks to establish whether, and to what extent, normative change is occurring in digital trade agreements, the nature of any changes, and identify which states are acting as norm entrepreneurs. We employ a new method of legal coding, systematically comparing the nature and prescriptiveness of digital provisions in 12 trade agreements concluded between 2019 and 2023. We find evidence of substantial policy innovation, and identify Singapore as the key norm entrepreneur. A new wave of ‘Singapore-led’ agreements substantially expands the scope of digital trade, to cover areas such as digital identities, e-invoicing and e-payments, the governance of AI, and regulation of new digital technologies. Commitments are typically couched as soft rather than hard law, reflecting the nascent stages of rulemaking. Norm entrepreneurship on the part of Singapore and its allies reflects a desire to position themselves as ‘digital hubs’ in the global economy, spur rulemaking in areas where innovation is ahead of regulation, and promote digital interconnectivity at time of regulatory divergence and geopolitical rivalry.</p>","PeriodicalId":46109,"journal":{"name":"World Trade Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Emily Jones, Beatriz Kira, Rutendo Tavengerwei\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1474745624000089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rulemaking in digital trade is proceeding apace. Many preferential trade agreements contain dedicated e-commerce or digital trade chapters and some states have entered into stand-alone digital economy agreements. This article seeks to establish whether, and to what extent, normative change is occurring in digital trade agreements, the nature of any changes, and identify which states are acting as norm entrepreneurs. We employ a new method of legal coding, systematically comparing the nature and prescriptiveness of digital provisions in 12 trade agreements concluded between 2019 and 2023. We find evidence of substantial policy innovation, and identify Singapore as the key norm entrepreneur. A new wave of ‘Singapore-led’ agreements substantially expands the scope of digital trade, to cover areas such as digital identities, e-invoicing and e-payments, the governance of AI, and regulation of new digital technologies. Commitments are typically couched as soft rather than hard law, reflecting the nascent stages of rulemaking. Norm entrepreneurship on the part of Singapore and its allies reflects a desire to position themselves as ‘digital hubs’ in the global economy, spur rulemaking in areas where innovation is ahead of regulation, and promote digital interconnectivity at time of regulatory divergence and geopolitical rivalry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Trade Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Trade Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745624000089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Trade Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745624000089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字贸易方面的规则制定工作正在快速进行。许多优惠贸易协定都包含专门的电子商务或数字贸易章节,一些国家还签订了独立的数字经济协定。本文旨在确定数字贸易协定中是否以及在多大程度上发生了规范性变化,任何变化的性质,并确定哪些国家正在扮演规范制定者的角色。我们采用了一种新的法律编码方法,系统地比较了 2019 年至 2023 年缔结的 12 项贸易协定中数字条款的性质和规定性。我们发现了大量政策创新的证据,并确定新加坡是主要的规范制定者。新一波 "新加坡主导 "的协议大幅扩大了数字贸易的范围,涵盖了数字身份、电子发票和电子支付、人工智能治理以及新数字技术监管等领域。这些承诺通常被称为软法而非硬法,反映了规则制定的初级阶段。新加坡及其盟国的规范创业精神反映出它们希望将自己定位为全球经济中的 "数字枢纽",在创新领先于监管的领域推动规则制定,并在监管分歧和地缘政治竞争之际促进数字互联互通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements

Rulemaking in digital trade is proceeding apace. Many preferential trade agreements contain dedicated e-commerce or digital trade chapters and some states have entered into stand-alone digital economy agreements. This article seeks to establish whether, and to what extent, normative change is occurring in digital trade agreements, the nature of any changes, and identify which states are acting as norm entrepreneurs. We employ a new method of legal coding, systematically comparing the nature and prescriptiveness of digital provisions in 12 trade agreements concluded between 2019 and 2023. We find evidence of substantial policy innovation, and identify Singapore as the key norm entrepreneur. A new wave of ‘Singapore-led’ agreements substantially expands the scope of digital trade, to cover areas such as digital identities, e-invoicing and e-payments, the governance of AI, and regulation of new digital technologies. Commitments are typically couched as soft rather than hard law, reflecting the nascent stages of rulemaking. Norm entrepreneurship on the part of Singapore and its allies reflects a desire to position themselves as ‘digital hubs’ in the global economy, spur rulemaking in areas where innovation is ahead of regulation, and promote digital interconnectivity at time of regulatory divergence and geopolitical rivalry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Trade Review
World Trade Review Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Alienated Twins – The Overlooked Private Law Dimension of Global Trade and Investment Governance The Demise of Globalization and Rise of Industrial Policy: Caveat Emptor Smart Cities and International Trade Law Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements Accounting for Carbon Pricing in Third Countries Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1