表面改性植入物的临床效率和稳定性:酸改性与光激活。

Q3 Medicine Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/Merkur202401107
Serhii S Terekhov, Andriy M Proshchenko, Nina S Proshchenko, Dina V Shorikova
{"title":"表面改性植入物的临床效率和稳定性:酸改性与光激活。","authors":"Serhii S Terekhov, Andriy M Proshchenko, Nina S Proshchenko, Dina V Shorikova","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202401107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>. Aim: To study the stability of surface-modified dental implants, with the usage of sandblasting/acid modification vs. photoactivation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: In the observation were included 164 patients with dental defects. All patients had digital impressions taken by scanning the oral cavity with an intraoral scanner 3Shape TRIOSR. Group A (80 subjects) included implants whose surface was modified with a combination of sandblasting and acid. Group B (84 subjects) - implants after modification with photoactivation. The implant stability quotient was recorded using an Osstell MentorTM device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation method in complex treatment of the surface of dental implants in improving the stability of fixed dentures in the short and long-term periods of observation was proven. When assessing immediate clinical outcomes, there was no significant difference in the frequency of hyperemia, algesia, hyperthermia, soft tissue edema, regional lymphadenitis, depending on the classical method of treating the implant surface and the complex method with photoactivation. Of the long-term clinical outcomes with classical surface treatment, the absolute risk of implant failure was 1.2%, relative risk - 0,99 [CI%0,96-1,0]. The average value of the implant stability coefficient (ISQ) and the data of the Periotest study at the time of surgery probably did not differ in the observation groups, after 3 months, a higher index was proven in the treatment of the surface by the method of photoactivation and greater stability of the mandibular implants. At the time of implantation, there were no statistically significant differences in implant fixation between the groups, however, during prospective observation in group A, secondary stability indicators based on periotestometry results were significantly lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: It was proved the reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation-method for surface modification in the short and long-term periods of observation for improving the results of orthodontically treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"52 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficiency and stability of surface-modified implants: acid modification versus photoactivation.\",\"authors\":\"Serhii S Terekhov, Andriy M Proshchenko, Nina S Proshchenko, Dina V Shorikova\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/Merkur202401107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>. Aim: To study the stability of surface-modified dental implants, with the usage of sandblasting/acid modification vs. photoactivation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: In the observation were included 164 patients with dental defects. All patients had digital impressions taken by scanning the oral cavity with an intraoral scanner 3Shape TRIOSR. Group A (80 subjects) included implants whose surface was modified with a combination of sandblasting and acid. Group B (84 subjects) - implants after modification with photoactivation. The implant stability quotient was recorded using an Osstell MentorTM device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation method in complex treatment of the surface of dental implants in improving the stability of fixed dentures in the short and long-term periods of observation was proven. When assessing immediate clinical outcomes, there was no significant difference in the frequency of hyperemia, algesia, hyperthermia, soft tissue edema, regional lymphadenitis, depending on the classical method of treating the implant surface and the complex method with photoactivation. Of the long-term clinical outcomes with classical surface treatment, the absolute risk of implant failure was 1.2%, relative risk - 0,99 [CI%0,96-1,0]. The average value of the implant stability coefficient (ISQ) and the data of the Periotest study at the time of surgery probably did not differ in the observation groups, after 3 months, a higher index was proven in the treatment of the surface by the method of photoactivation and greater stability of the mandibular implants. At the time of implantation, there were no statistically significant differences in implant fixation between the groups, however, during prospective observation in group A, secondary stability indicators based on periotestometry results were significantly lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: It was proved the reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation-method for surface modification in the short and long-term periods of observation for improving the results of orthodontically treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"42-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202401107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202401107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:.目的:研究表面改性牙科植入物的稳定性,喷砂/酸改性与光激活的对比:材料与方法观察对象包括 164 名牙科缺陷患者。所有患者均使用口内扫描仪 3Shape TRIOSR 扫描口腔,获得数字印模。A 组(80 名受试者)包括表面经过喷砂和酸处理的种植体。B 组(84 名受试者)--种植体经过光活化处理。使用 Osstell MentorTM 设备记录种植体的稳定性商数:结果:结果:在短期和长期观察中,证明了光激活法在牙科种植体表面复合处理中提高固定假牙稳定性的可靠有效性。在评估近期临床效果时,传统的种植体表面处理方法和光激活复合方法在充血、藻类、高热、软组织水肿、区域淋巴结炎的发生频率上没有明显差异。在传统表面处理的长期临床结果中,种植失败的绝对风险为 1.2%,相对风险为 0.99 [CI%0.96-1.0]。手术时的种植体稳定性系数(ISQ)平均值和 Periotest 研究数据在观察组中可能没有差异,但在 3 个月后,用光激活法处理表面的指数更高,下颌种植体的稳定性也更强。在种植时,各组之间的种植体固定情况没有明显的统计学差异,但在对A组进行前瞻性观察期间,根据周压测量结果得出的次要稳定性指标明显较低:结论:结论:通过短期和长期观察,证明了光激活表面改性方法在改善正畸治疗效果方面的可靠有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical efficiency and stability of surface-modified implants: acid modification versus photoactivation.

Objective: . Aim: To study the stability of surface-modified dental implants, with the usage of sandblasting/acid modification vs. photoactivation.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: In the observation were included 164 patients with dental defects. All patients had digital impressions taken by scanning the oral cavity with an intraoral scanner 3Shape TRIOSR. Group A (80 subjects) included implants whose surface was modified with a combination of sandblasting and acid. Group B (84 subjects) - implants after modification with photoactivation. The implant stability quotient was recorded using an Osstell MentorTM device.

Results: Results: The reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation method in complex treatment of the surface of dental implants in improving the stability of fixed dentures in the short and long-term periods of observation was proven. When assessing immediate clinical outcomes, there was no significant difference in the frequency of hyperemia, algesia, hyperthermia, soft tissue edema, regional lymphadenitis, depending on the classical method of treating the implant surface and the complex method with photoactivation. Of the long-term clinical outcomes with classical surface treatment, the absolute risk of implant failure was 1.2%, relative risk - 0,99 [CI%0,96-1,0]. The average value of the implant stability coefficient (ISQ) and the data of the Periotest study at the time of surgery probably did not differ in the observation groups, after 3 months, a higher index was proven in the treatment of the surface by the method of photoactivation and greater stability of the mandibular implants. At the time of implantation, there were no statistically significant differences in implant fixation between the groups, however, during prospective observation in group A, secondary stability indicators based on periotestometry results were significantly lower.

Conclusion: Conclusions: It was proved the reliable effectiveness of the photoactivation-method for surface modification in the short and long-term periods of observation for improving the results of orthodontically treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of early postoperative results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. Coronavirus infection and systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome. Empathy, self-compassion, and depression correlations among health professionals in Northern Greece. Epidemiological parameters and monitoring of analysis of treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in insulin pump therapy with modified educational program. Evaluation of potential prevalence of onconeural antibodies in women with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1