公私合作伙伴关系中灵活性的力量:美国国家首都地区的两个基本建设项目

IF 5.1 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Project Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1177/87569728241241301
Yu Wang, Young Hoon Kwak, Qingbin Cui
{"title":"公私合作伙伴关系中灵活性的力量:美国国家首都地区的两个基本建设项目","authors":"Yu Wang, Young Hoon Kwak, Qingbin Cui","doi":"10.1177/87569728241241301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on the new stakeholder theory to examine the role of flexibility in the decision process within capital-intensive public–private partnerships (PPPs). It highlights that successful PPPs rely on the project sponsor’s ability to effectively utilize market stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., information and expertise) to maximize economic value creation, and to gain nonmarket stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., support) through equitable social value identification and distribution. Drawing on two case studies in the national capital region of the United States, this article proposes a theoretical view to understand flexibility and stakeholder management for capital-intensive PPPs.","PeriodicalId":47967,"journal":{"name":"Project Management Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power(lessness) of Flexibility in Public–Private Partnerships: Two Capital Projects From the National Capital Region\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wang, Young Hoon Kwak, Qingbin Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87569728241241301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws on the new stakeholder theory to examine the role of flexibility in the decision process within capital-intensive public–private partnerships (PPPs). It highlights that successful PPPs rely on the project sponsor’s ability to effectively utilize market stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., information and expertise) to maximize economic value creation, and to gain nonmarket stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., support) through equitable social value identification and distribution. Drawing on two case studies in the national capital region of the United States, this article proposes a theoretical view to understand flexibility and stakeholder management for capital-intensive PPPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Project Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Project Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241241301\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241241301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文借鉴新利益相关者理论,研究灵活性在资本密集型公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)决策过程中的作用。文章强调,成功的公私合作伙伴关系有赖于项目发起人有效利用市场利益相关者的关键资源(即信息和专业知识)的能力,以最大限度地创造经济价值,并通过公平的社会价值识别和分配获得非市场利益相关者的关键资源(即支持)。本文通过对美国国家首都地区的两个案例研究,提出了一种理论观点来理解资本密集型公私伙伴关系的灵活性和利益相关者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Power(lessness) of Flexibility in Public–Private Partnerships: Two Capital Projects From the National Capital Region
This article draws on the new stakeholder theory to examine the role of flexibility in the decision process within capital-intensive public–private partnerships (PPPs). It highlights that successful PPPs rely on the project sponsor’s ability to effectively utilize market stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., information and expertise) to maximize economic value creation, and to gain nonmarket stakeholders’ critical resources (i.e., support) through equitable social value identification and distribution. Drawing on two case studies in the national capital region of the United States, this article proposes a theoretical view to understand flexibility and stakeholder management for capital-intensive PPPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
14.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Project Management Journal (PMJ) is the academic and research journal of the Project Management Institute and features state-of-the-art research, techniques, theories, and applications in project management. Projects represent a growing population of human activity in large, small, private, and public organizations. Projects are used to execute and sustain today's organizational activities. They play a fundamental role as the engine of tomorrow's innovation, value creation, and strategic change. However, projects often fail to deliver their promise. PMJ addresses these multiple challenges and opportunities by encouraging the development and application of novel theories, concepts, frameworks, research methods, and designs. PMJ embraces contributions both from within and beyond project management to augment and transform theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Connections Between Project Management Offices and Organizational Design Tensions in Digital Transformation: How Prototype Work Links the Temporary and the Permanent An Action Theory of the Project Managing Finances in Scaled Agile Transformations: Insights from A Case Study of a German Automotive Manufacturer Raison d'Etre of Organization Design Arrangements in Project-Based Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1