Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat
{"title":"系统性硬化症患者惯用手和对侧手的功能障碍。","authors":"Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The functional disabilities of the dominant and opposite hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The functional disabilities of the dominant and opposite hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Objectives: Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.
Methods: This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.
Results: Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.
Conclusions: The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.