Sigrid Heinsbroek, Vincent Bontrop, Rutger Chorus, Christian Michel Zwaan
{"title":"导致医学研究伦理委员会(MREC)做出否定决定的临床研究中的问题","authors":"Sigrid Heinsbroek, Vincent Bontrop, Rutger Chorus, Christian Michel Zwaan","doi":"10.36850/21gx-cy60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rationale behind a Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) negative decision is always shared directly with the applicants. However, insight into the review process and common reasons for a negative decision may also be valuable for other researchers, clinical research organizations and people with an interest in MREC processes. To our knowledge Medical Research Ethics Committees (MRECs) do generally not report on the negative decisions they issue and on the underlying rationale for such decisions. Here we give insight into the MREC review process by briefly describing procedures and discussing the negative decisions issued by MREC NedMec in the past five years.","PeriodicalId":471449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trial and error","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues in Clinical Studies Leading to Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Negative Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Sigrid Heinsbroek, Vincent Bontrop, Rutger Chorus, Christian Michel Zwaan\",\"doi\":\"10.36850/21gx-cy60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rationale behind a Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) negative decision is always shared directly with the applicants. However, insight into the review process and common reasons for a negative decision may also be valuable for other researchers, clinical research organizations and people with an interest in MREC processes. To our knowledge Medical Research Ethics Committees (MRECs) do generally not report on the negative decisions they issue and on the underlying rationale for such decisions. Here we give insight into the MREC review process by briefly describing procedures and discussing the negative decisions issued by MREC NedMec in the past five years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of trial and error\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36850/21gx-cy60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trial and error","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/21gx-cy60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Issues in Clinical Studies Leading to Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Negative Decisions
The rationale behind a Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) negative decision is always shared directly with the applicants. However, insight into the review process and common reasons for a negative decision may also be valuable for other researchers, clinical research organizations and people with an interest in MREC processes. To our knowledge Medical Research Ethics Committees (MRECs) do generally not report on the negative decisions they issue and on the underlying rationale for such decisions. Here we give insight into the MREC review process by briefly describing procedures and discussing the negative decisions issued by MREC NedMec in the past five years.