用两种不同方法分离 RNA,分析小鼠脂肪组织的脂肪生物标志物

D. Chu, Hue Vu Thi, Ngoc Hoan Le
{"title":"用两种不同方法分离 RNA,分析小鼠脂肪组织的脂肪生物标志物","authors":"D. Chu, Hue Vu Thi, Ngoc Hoan Le","doi":"10.31276/vjste.66(1).84-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol are commonly employed techniques for extracting total RNA and are widely utilised in research pertaining to the expression of adipose biomarkers. This study was undertaken to establish and determine an appropriate method for isolating RNA from frozen adipose tissue, with the objective of analysing adipose biomarkers. Total RNA was extracted from frozen white adipose tissues of mice (-80oC) using both the RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol. The concentration and purity of the RNA were assessed using NanoDrop. One-step RT-qPCR was employed to quantify the mRNA expression levels of three adipose biomarkers: MEST, SFRP5, and SCD1. The results of this investigation indicated that the RNeasy Mini Kit yielded a higher RNA concentration when compared to the TRI Reagent method. Furthermore, the RNeasy Mini Kit provided RNA samples with superior purity, as evidenced by a higher 260/230 ratio. Although RNA extracted using the TRI Reagent exhibited slightly elevated mRNA expression levels for the three biomarkers, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In summary, both methods are suitable for total RNA extraction, but the RNeasy Mini Kit is recommended for obtaining higher RNA concentration and purity. The choice of method should be contingent upon the intended downstream application of the RNA.","PeriodicalId":18650,"journal":{"name":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam","volume":"116 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RNA isolation by two different methods in analysing adipose-biomarkers of mouse adipose tissues\",\"authors\":\"D. Chu, Hue Vu Thi, Ngoc Hoan Le\",\"doi\":\"10.31276/vjste.66(1).84-89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol are commonly employed techniques for extracting total RNA and are widely utilised in research pertaining to the expression of adipose biomarkers. This study was undertaken to establish and determine an appropriate method for isolating RNA from frozen adipose tissue, with the objective of analysing adipose biomarkers. Total RNA was extracted from frozen white adipose tissues of mice (-80oC) using both the RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol. The concentration and purity of the RNA were assessed using NanoDrop. One-step RT-qPCR was employed to quantify the mRNA expression levels of three adipose biomarkers: MEST, SFRP5, and SCD1. The results of this investigation indicated that the RNeasy Mini Kit yielded a higher RNA concentration when compared to the TRI Reagent method. Furthermore, the RNeasy Mini Kit provided RNA samples with superior purity, as evidenced by a higher 260/230 ratio. Although RNA extracted using the TRI Reagent exhibited slightly elevated mRNA expression levels for the three biomarkers, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In summary, both methods are suitable for total RNA extraction, but the RNeasy Mini Kit is recommended for obtaining higher RNA concentration and purity. The choice of method should be contingent upon the intended downstream application of the RNA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam\",\"volume\":\"116 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31276/vjste.66(1).84-89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Vietnam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31276/vjste.66(1).84-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

RNeasy Mini Kit 和 TRI Reagent 协议是提取总 RNA 的常用技术,在有关脂肪生物标志物表达的研究中被广泛使用。本研究旨在建立和确定从冷冻脂肪组织中分离 RNA 的适当方法,目的是分析脂肪生物标志物。研究人员使用 RNeasy Mini Kit 和 TRI Reagent 方法从冷冻的小鼠白色脂肪组织(-80oC)中提取总 RNA。使用 NanoDrop 对 RNA 的浓度和纯度进行了评估。采用一步式 RT-qPCR 对三种脂肪生物标志物的 mRNA 表达水平进行量化:MEST、SFRP5 和 SCD1。研究结果表明,与 TRI 试剂法相比,RNeasy Mini 试剂盒产生的 RNA 浓度更高。此外,RNeasy Mini 试剂盒提供的 RNA 样品纯度更高,260/230 比率也更高。虽然使用 TRI 试剂提取的 RNA 在三种生物标志物的 mRNA 表达水平上略有升高,但这些差异未达到统计学意义。总之,两种方法都适用于总 RNA 提取,但建议使用 RNeasy Mini 试剂盒来获得更高的 RNA 浓度和纯度。选择哪种方法应根据 RNA 的下游应用而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RNA isolation by two different methods in analysing adipose-biomarkers of mouse adipose tissues
The RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol are commonly employed techniques for extracting total RNA and are widely utilised in research pertaining to the expression of adipose biomarkers. This study was undertaken to establish and determine an appropriate method for isolating RNA from frozen adipose tissue, with the objective of analysing adipose biomarkers. Total RNA was extracted from frozen white adipose tissues of mice (-80oC) using both the RNeasy Mini Kit and the TRI Reagent protocol. The concentration and purity of the RNA were assessed using NanoDrop. One-step RT-qPCR was employed to quantify the mRNA expression levels of three adipose biomarkers: MEST, SFRP5, and SCD1. The results of this investigation indicated that the RNeasy Mini Kit yielded a higher RNA concentration when compared to the TRI Reagent method. Furthermore, the RNeasy Mini Kit provided RNA samples with superior purity, as evidenced by a higher 260/230 ratio. Although RNA extracted using the TRI Reagent exhibited slightly elevated mRNA expression levels for the three biomarkers, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In summary, both methods are suitable for total RNA extraction, but the RNeasy Mini Kit is recommended for obtaining higher RNA concentration and purity. The choice of method should be contingent upon the intended downstream application of the RNA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantification of catalpol in root of Rehmannia glutinosa varieties 19 collected in Phu Tho province by high-performance liquid chromatography Morphology, anatomy, and quantitative determination of corosolic acid in Lagerstroemia calyculata Kurz in the Southeast region, Vietnam Prediction of geomechanical changes in faulted rock mass around underground structures subjected to earthquakes Synthesis of TiO2 by hydrothermal method using deep eutectic solvent for application in dye-sensitised solar cell Application of solid-phase extraction materials from ion liquids for the analysis of carbamate pesticide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1