利用ICG荧光导航阴性染色法进行腹腔镜肝段切除术的优势:与开腹手术的比较

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1002/ags3.12786
Kenichiro Araki, Akira Watanabe, Norifumi Harimoto, Takamichi Igrashi, Mariko Tsukagoshi, Norihiro Ishii, Shunsuke Kawai, Kei Hagiwara, Kouki Hoshino, Ken Shirabe
{"title":"利用ICG荧光导航阴性染色法进行腹腔镜肝段切除术的优势:与开腹手术的比较","authors":"Kenichiro Araki,&nbsp;Akira Watanabe,&nbsp;Norifumi Harimoto,&nbsp;Takamichi Igrashi,&nbsp;Mariko Tsukagoshi,&nbsp;Norihiro Ishii,&nbsp;Shunsuke Kawai,&nbsp;Kei Hagiwara,&nbsp;Kouki Hoshino,&nbsp;Ken Shirabe","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic segmentectomy (LS) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation with negative staining method has potential for performing accurate and safe anatomical excision. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of LS using ICG fluorescence navigation compared with open segmentectomy (OS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-seven patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomies were evaluated for OS (<i>n</i> = 44) and LS (<i>n</i> = 43). The Glissonean pedicle approach was performed using either extra- or intrahepatic method, depending on the location of segment in LS. After clamping pedicle, negative staining method was performed. Liver transection was done along intersegmental plane visualizing by overlay mode of ICG camera. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups. Correlation between predicted resecting liver volume (PRLV) calculated using volumetry and actual resected liver volume (ARLV) was assessed in two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent LS showed better outcomes in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. There were significantly fewer Grade II and Grade III or higher postoperative complications in LS group. Both values of AST (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and ALT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in LS group than in OS group. PRLV and ARLV were more strongly correlated in LS (<i>r</i> = 0.896) than in OS (<i>r</i> = 0.773). The difference between PRLV and ARLV was significantly lower in LS group than in OS group (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and this trend was particularly noticeable in posterosuperior segment (<i>p</i> = 0.008) than in anterolateral segment (<i>p</i> = 0.811).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>LS using ICG navigation allows precise resection and may contribute to safer short-term outcomes than OS, particularly in posterosuperior segment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12786","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages of laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver using ICG fluorescent navigation by the negative staining method: A comparison with open procedure\",\"authors\":\"Kenichiro Araki,&nbsp;Akira Watanabe,&nbsp;Norifumi Harimoto,&nbsp;Takamichi Igrashi,&nbsp;Mariko Tsukagoshi,&nbsp;Norihiro Ishii,&nbsp;Shunsuke Kawai,&nbsp;Kei Hagiwara,&nbsp;Kouki Hoshino,&nbsp;Ken Shirabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ags3.12786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopic segmentectomy (LS) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation with negative staining method has potential for performing accurate and safe anatomical excision. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of LS using ICG fluorescence navigation compared with open segmentectomy (OS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-seven patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomies were evaluated for OS (<i>n</i> = 44) and LS (<i>n</i> = 43). The Glissonean pedicle approach was performed using either extra- or intrahepatic method, depending on the location of segment in LS. After clamping pedicle, negative staining method was performed. Liver transection was done along intersegmental plane visualizing by overlay mode of ICG camera. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups. Correlation between predicted resecting liver volume (PRLV) calculated using volumetry and actual resected liver volume (ARLV) was assessed in two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent LS showed better outcomes in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. There were significantly fewer Grade II and Grade III or higher postoperative complications in LS group. Both values of AST (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and ALT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in LS group than in OS group. PRLV and ARLV were more strongly correlated in LS (<i>r</i> = 0.896) than in OS (<i>r</i> = 0.773). The difference between PRLV and ARLV was significantly lower in LS group than in OS group (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and this trend was particularly noticeable in posterosuperior segment (<i>p</i> = 0.008) than in anterolateral segment (<i>p</i> = 0.811).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>LS using ICG navigation allows precise resection and may contribute to safer short-term outcomes than OS, particularly in posterosuperior segment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12786\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12786\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用吲哚青绿(ICG)荧光导航和阴性染色法的腹腔镜节段切除术(LS)具有进行准确、安全的解剖切除的潜力。这项研究旨在评估使用ICG荧光导航的LS与开放式节段切除术(OS)相比的意义。87名接受解剖节段切除术的患者接受了OS(44人)和LS(43人)的评估。根据LS节段的位置,采用肝外或肝内方法进行Glissonean梗管切口。钳夹肝蒂后,采用阴性染色法。沿肝段间平面进行肝横断,通过 ICG 相机的叠加模式进行观察。比较两组的手术结果。两组患者在手术时间、失血量和住院时间方面的疗效更好。LS组患者的II级和III级以上术后并发症明显较少。LS组术后第1天的AST(p < 0.001)和ALT(p < 0.001)值均明显低于OS组。LS 组 PRLV 和 ARLV 的相关性(r = 0.896)高于 OS 组(r = 0.773)。LS组的PRLV和ARLV之间的差异明显低于OS组(p = 0.022),这一趋势在后上段(p = 0.008)比前外侧段(p = 0.811)尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advantages of laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver using ICG fluorescent navigation by the negative staining method: A comparison with open procedure

Aim

Laparoscopic segmentectomy (LS) using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation with negative staining method has potential for performing accurate and safe anatomical excision. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of LS using ICG fluorescence navigation compared with open segmentectomy (OS).

Methods

Eighty-seven patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomies were evaluated for OS (n = 44) and LS (n = 43). The Glissonean pedicle approach was performed using either extra- or intrahepatic method, depending on the location of segment in LS. After clamping pedicle, negative staining method was performed. Liver transection was done along intersegmental plane visualizing by overlay mode of ICG camera. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups. Correlation between predicted resecting liver volume (PRLV) calculated using volumetry and actual resected liver volume (ARLV) was assessed in two groups.

Results

Patients who underwent LS showed better outcomes in operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. There were significantly fewer Grade II and Grade III or higher postoperative complications in LS group. Both values of AST (p < 0.001) and ALT (p < 0.001) on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in LS group than in OS group. PRLV and ARLV were more strongly correlated in LS (r = 0.896) than in OS (r = 0.773). The difference between PRLV and ARLV was significantly lower in LS group than in OS group (p = 0.022), and this trend was particularly noticeable in posterosuperior segment (p = 0.008) than in anterolateral segment (p = 0.811).

Conclusion

LS using ICG navigation allows precise resection and may contribute to safer short-term outcomes than OS, particularly in posterosuperior segment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic median arcuate ligament release using an anterior approach for median arcuate ligament syndrome Issue Information Essential updates 2022-2023: Surgical and adjuvant therapies for locally advanced colorectal cancer. Phase II study of long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer in Japan: ENSEMBLE-2. Essential updates 2022/2023: Recent advances in perioperative management of esophagectomy to improve operative outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1