{"title":"提取的不对称性表明,A 型配位是邻接配位:补充材料","authors":"Ad Neeleman, Misako Tanaka","doi":"10.1353/lan.2024.a922788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Ross (1967) observed that the coordinate structure constraint can be violated in certain semantically asymmetric structures. In this article we consider one of these structures, namely type A coordination, in detail (the terminology is from Lakoff 1986; an example is Here's the whisky I went to the store and bought ). We present experimental evidence showing that the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from type A coordinate structures matches the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from structures containing rationale clauses in all crucial respects. This near-perfect parallel behavior suggests that, like rationale clauses, the second conjunct in a type A coordination is an adjunct (see also Brown 2017). We explore the consequences of this finding for both interpretive and syntactic analyses of asymmetric coordination.","PeriodicalId":503033,"journal":{"name":"Language","volume":"256 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction asymmetries show that type A coordination is adjunction: Supplementary material\",\"authors\":\"Ad Neeleman, Misako Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lan.2024.a922788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Ross (1967) observed that the coordinate structure constraint can be violated in certain semantically asymmetric structures. In this article we consider one of these structures, namely type A coordination, in detail (the terminology is from Lakoff 1986; an example is Here's the whisky I went to the store and bought ). We present experimental evidence showing that the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from type A coordinate structures matches the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from structures containing rationale clauses in all crucial respects. This near-perfect parallel behavior suggests that, like rationale clauses, the second conjunct in a type A coordination is an adjunct (see also Brown 2017). We explore the consequences of this finding for both interpretive and syntactic analyses of asymmetric coordination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language\",\"volume\":\"256 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2024.a922788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2024.a922788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:Ross(1967)发现,在某些语义不对称的结构中,坐标结构约束可能会被违反。在本文中,我们详细探讨了其中的一种结构,即 A 型坐标结构(术语来自 Lakoff 1986;例子是 Here's the whisky I went to the store and bought)。我们提出的实验证据表明,从 A 型协调结构中提取论据和从句的模式在所有关键方面都与从包含理由分句的结构中提取论据和从句的模式相吻合。这种近乎完美的平行行为表明,与理由从句一样,A 型配位中的第二个连接词也是附属词(另见 Brown 2017)。我们将探讨这一发现对非对称协调的解释学和句法分析的影响。
Extraction asymmetries show that type A coordination is adjunction: Supplementary material
Abstract: Ross (1967) observed that the coordinate structure constraint can be violated in certain semantically asymmetric structures. In this article we consider one of these structures, namely type A coordination, in detail (the terminology is from Lakoff 1986; an example is Here's the whisky I went to the store and bought ). We present experimental evidence showing that the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from type A coordinate structures matches the pattern of argument and adjunct extraction from structures containing rationale clauses in all crucial respects. This near-perfect parallel behavior suggests that, like rationale clauses, the second conjunct in a type A coordination is an adjunct (see also Brown 2017). We explore the consequences of this finding for both interpretive and syntactic analyses of asymmetric coordination.