人类对材料设计的发散探索能力:与人工智能的比较

Hiroyuki Sakai, Kenroh Matsuda, Nobuaki Kikkawa, Seiji Kajita
{"title":"人类对材料设计的发散探索能力:与人工智能的比较","authors":"Hiroyuki Sakai,&nbsp;Kenroh Matsuda,&nbsp;Nobuaki Kikkawa,&nbsp;Seiji Kajita","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to material design have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although AI-aided material design holds great promise for some applications, whether it has surpassed human creativity remains uncertain. The aim of the current study was to compare the divergent exploration capacity of AI with that of humans on a material design task. Human participants were asked to find a high-performance lubricant molecule under searching conditions comparable to a state-of-the-art AI system. Results indicated that, on average, AI was able to find significantly better lubricant molecules. However, the best molecule found by AI fell short of the best molecule found by a human participant. Furthermore, the structural characteristics of the molecules found by AI and human participants differed significantly. These findings suggest that a state-of-the-art AI system is capable of surpassing human divergent exploration capacity in material design, as in other fields in which AI has advanced. Nevertheless, our results also demonstrate that human intelligence and AI can play complementary roles in covering a broader search space. This investigation opens up new possibilities for collaborative systems involving both AI agents and humans in material design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000240/pdfft?md5=db3d3329fefc1457f503f1848dc6a1be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000240-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human divergent exploration capacity for material design: A comparison with artificial intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Sakai,&nbsp;Kenroh Matsuda,&nbsp;Nobuaki Kikkawa,&nbsp;Seiji Kajita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to material design have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although AI-aided material design holds great promise for some applications, whether it has surpassed human creativity remains uncertain. The aim of the current study was to compare the divergent exploration capacity of AI with that of humans on a material design task. Human participants were asked to find a high-performance lubricant molecule under searching conditions comparable to a state-of-the-art AI system. Results indicated that, on average, AI was able to find significantly better lubricant molecules. However, the best molecule found by AI fell short of the best molecule found by a human participant. Furthermore, the structural characteristics of the molecules found by AI and human participants differed significantly. These findings suggest that a state-of-the-art AI system is capable of surpassing human divergent exploration capacity in material design, as in other fields in which AI has advanced. Nevertheless, our results also demonstrate that human intelligence and AI can play complementary roles in covering a broader search space. This investigation opens up new possibilities for collaborative systems involving both AI agents and humans in material design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000240/pdfft?md5=db3d3329fefc1457f503f1848dc6a1be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000240-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能(AI)在材料设计中的应用日益受到关注。虽然人工智能辅助材料设计在某些应用领域大有可为,但它是否已经超越人类的创造力仍不确定。本研究旨在比较人工智能与人类在材料设计任务中的发散探索能力。要求人类参与者在与最先进的人工智能系统相当的搜索条件下找到一种高性能润滑剂分子。结果表明,平均而言,人工智能能够找到明显更好的润滑剂分子。不过,人工智能找到的最佳分子与人类参与者找到的最佳分子相比还有差距。此外,人工智能和人类参与者找到的分子的结构特征也有很大不同。这些研究结果表明,在材料设计领域,最先进的人工智能系统能够超越人类的发散探索能力,就像人工智能在其他领域的发展一样。不过,我们的研究结果也表明,人类智能和人工智能可以在覆盖更广阔的搜索空间方面发挥互补作用。这项研究为人工智能代理和人类共同参与材料设计的协作系统开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human divergent exploration capacity for material design: A comparison with artificial intelligence

Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to material design have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although AI-aided material design holds great promise for some applications, whether it has surpassed human creativity remains uncertain. The aim of the current study was to compare the divergent exploration capacity of AI with that of humans on a material design task. Human participants were asked to find a high-performance lubricant molecule under searching conditions comparable to a state-of-the-art AI system. Results indicated that, on average, AI was able to find significantly better lubricant molecules. However, the best molecule found by AI fell short of the best molecule found by a human participant. Furthermore, the structural characteristics of the molecules found by AI and human participants differed significantly. These findings suggest that a state-of-the-art AI system is capable of surpassing human divergent exploration capacity in material design, as in other fields in which AI has advanced. Nevertheless, our results also demonstrate that human intelligence and AI can play complementary roles in covering a broader search space. This investigation opens up new possibilities for collaborative systems involving both AI agents and humans in material design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1