肱二头肌长头腱膜切除术和腱膜切除术后患者屈肘力量下降的比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4149/BLL_2024_32
Robert Krause, Augustin Majcher, Boris Steno
{"title":"肱二头肌长头腱膜切除术和腱膜切除术后患者屈肘力量下降的比较。","authors":"Robert Krause, Augustin Majcher, Boris Steno","doi":"10.4149/BLL_2024_32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Ntroduction: </strong>The last two decades have been leading to the development of several types of surgical techniques and procedures to manage the LHB lesions. This paper analyses and compares the difference in muscle strength pre- and post-operatively in two most commonly used surgical procedures - LHB tenotomy and tenodesis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study includes 68 patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020. The patients who had met the prospective study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on type of surgery they had undergone (LHB tenotomy or tenodesis); each group consisted of 34. The muscle strength during elbow flexion was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using the Commander Echo Console ultrasound muscle testing device. All patients enrolled in the study had been assessed for elbow flexion strength preoperatively. The muscle strength was measured preoperatively and then 3 years postoperatively (12 to 60 months) on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirmed that the patients who had undergone LHB tenodesis show a significantly lower decrease in elbow flexion strength and a significantly lower incidence of \"Popeye\" deformity than the patients after LHB tenotomy. Moreover, in the tenodesis group, it was possible to initiate rehabilitation earlier. The incidence of postoperative complications was almost identical in both groups of patients (Tab. 10, Fig. 6, Ref. 40).</p>","PeriodicalId":55328,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of decrease in elbow flexion strength in patients after tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Krause, Augustin Majcher, Boris Steno\",\"doi\":\"10.4149/BLL_2024_32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Ntroduction: </strong>The last two decades have been leading to the development of several types of surgical techniques and procedures to manage the LHB lesions. This paper analyses and compares the difference in muscle strength pre- and post-operatively in two most commonly used surgical procedures - LHB tenotomy and tenodesis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study includes 68 patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020. The patients who had met the prospective study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on type of surgery they had undergone (LHB tenotomy or tenodesis); each group consisted of 34. The muscle strength during elbow flexion was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using the Commander Echo Console ultrasound muscle testing device. All patients enrolled in the study had been assessed for elbow flexion strength preoperatively. The muscle strength was measured preoperatively and then 3 years postoperatively (12 to 60 months) on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirmed that the patients who had undergone LHB tenodesis show a significantly lower decrease in elbow flexion strength and a significantly lower incidence of \\\"Popeye\\\" deformity than the patients after LHB tenotomy. Moreover, in the tenodesis group, it was possible to initiate rehabilitation earlier. The incidence of postoperative complications was almost identical in both groups of patients (Tab. 10, Fig. 6, Ref. 40).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2024_32\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2024_32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:近二十年来,治疗 LHB 病变的外科技术和手术方法不断发展。本文分析并比较了两种最常用的手术方法--LHB腱切开术和腱鞘切除术--术前和术后肌肉力量的差异:研究对象包括在 2016 年至 2020 年期间接受手术的 68 名患者。符合前瞻性研究纳入标准的患者根据手术类型(LHB腱切开术或腱鞘切除术)分为两组,每组34人。术前和术后使用 Commander Echo Console 超声肌肉测试仪测量患者屈肘时的肌肉力量。所有参与研究的患者在术前都接受了肘关节屈曲肌力评估。结论:研究证实,与接受 LHB 腱切开术的患者相比,接受 LHB 腱切开术的患者肘关节屈曲力量的下降幅度明显较小,"大力水手 "畸形的发生率也明显较低。此外,腱鞘切除术组患者可以更早地开始康复治疗。两组患者的术后并发症发生率几乎相同(表10,图6,参考文献40)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of decrease in elbow flexion strength in patients after tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.

Ntroduction: The last two decades have been leading to the development of several types of surgical techniques and procedures to manage the LHB lesions. This paper analyses and compares the difference in muscle strength pre- and post-operatively in two most commonly used surgical procedures - LHB tenotomy and tenodesis.

Method: The study includes 68 patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020. The patients who had met the prospective study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on type of surgery they had undergone (LHB tenotomy or tenodesis); each group consisted of 34. The muscle strength during elbow flexion was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using the Commander Echo Console ultrasound muscle testing device. All patients enrolled in the study had been assessed for elbow flexion strength preoperatively. The muscle strength was measured preoperatively and then 3 years postoperatively (12 to 60 months) on average.

Conclusion: The study confirmed that the patients who had undergone LHB tenodesis show a significantly lower decrease in elbow flexion strength and a significantly lower incidence of "Popeye" deformity than the patients after LHB tenotomy. Moreover, in the tenodesis group, it was possible to initiate rehabilitation earlier. The incidence of postoperative complications was almost identical in both groups of patients (Tab. 10, Fig. 6, Ref. 40).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The international biomedical journal - Bratislava Medical Journal – Bratislavske lekarske listy (Bratisl Lek Listy/Bratisl Med J) publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of biomedical sciences, including experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, original clinical studies and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Importance of CHB's grey zone: analysis of patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Prevalence of diastasis m. rectus abdominis and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in postpartum women. The founding of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine from the memories of the first dean Prof. MUDr. Jan Knazovicky. 75th anniversary of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine in Kosice. The presence of glutathione peroxidase 8 (GPx8) in rat male genital organs. Use of hepatocyte transplantation after extensive liver resections in experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1