感性与理性:巨型项目开发的叙事策略

Lama (Al) Arda , Giovanni Esposito , Rens Wilderom
{"title":"感性与理性:巨型项目开发的叙事策略","authors":"Lama (Al) Arda ,&nbsp;Giovanni Esposito ,&nbsp;Rens Wilderom","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines how policymakers’ different narrative strategies influence citizens’ attitudes towards megaprojects thus shaping their development. Drawing on an in-depth case study about the Lyon-Turin trainline, we identify two distinct narrative ideal-types: hedonic narrative and instrumental narrative. Our findings demonstrate that these strategies influence both rational thinking (sense) and emotional engagement (sensibility). Hedonic narratives can have a negative impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them feel uncertain and consequently leading them to oppose the project, while instrumental narratives can have positive impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them informed and consequently leading them to supporting the project. Therefore, our findings highlight the significance of employing different narrative strategies, and the different effects of mobilizing the different narrative strategies vis-a-vis megaprojects in two institutional contexts. In addition, our study contributed to this special issue by mobilizing a novel comprehensive methodological approach Latent Dirichlet Algorithm (LDA), along with qualitative methods to gain insights into the complex dynamics of stakeholder behavior in megaprojects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000036/pdfft?md5=10b023746ebbf0f1ba4d7812ca38b4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000036-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sense and sensibility: Narrative strategies shaping megaproject development\",\"authors\":\"Lama (Al) Arda ,&nbsp;Giovanni Esposito ,&nbsp;Rens Wilderom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines how policymakers’ different narrative strategies influence citizens’ attitudes towards megaprojects thus shaping their development. Drawing on an in-depth case study about the Lyon-Turin trainline, we identify two distinct narrative ideal-types: hedonic narrative and instrumental narrative. Our findings demonstrate that these strategies influence both rational thinking (sense) and emotional engagement (sensibility). Hedonic narratives can have a negative impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them feel uncertain and consequently leading them to oppose the project, while instrumental narratives can have positive impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them informed and consequently leading them to supporting the project. Therefore, our findings highlight the significance of employing different narrative strategies, and the different effects of mobilizing the different narrative strategies vis-a-vis megaprojects in two institutional contexts. In addition, our study contributed to this special issue by mobilizing a novel comprehensive methodological approach Latent Dirichlet Algorithm (LDA), along with qualitative methods to gain insights into the complex dynamics of stakeholder behavior in megaprojects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000036/pdfft?md5=10b023746ebbf0f1ba4d7812ca38b4b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000036-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Project Leadership and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了政策制定者的不同叙事策略如何影响公民对大型项目的态度,进而影响其发展。通过对里昂-都灵铁路线的深入案例研究,我们发现了两种不同的叙事理想类型:享乐型叙事和工具型叙事。我们的研究结果表明,这些策略既影响理性思维(理智),也影响情感参与(感性)。享乐型叙事会对公民的态度产生负面影响,使他们感到不确定,从而导致他们反对该项目;而工具型叙事则会对公民的态度产生积极影响,使他们了解相关信息,从而导致他们支持该项目。因此,我们的研究结果凸显了采用不同叙事策略的重要性,以及在两种制度背景下,针对超大项目调动不同叙事策略所产生的不同效果。此外,我们的研究还采用了一种新颖的综合方法--潜狄利克特算法(LDA),并结合定性方法来深入了解巨型项目中利益相关者行为的复杂动态,从而为本特刊做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sense and sensibility: Narrative strategies shaping megaproject development

This study examines how policymakers’ different narrative strategies influence citizens’ attitudes towards megaprojects thus shaping their development. Drawing on an in-depth case study about the Lyon-Turin trainline, we identify two distinct narrative ideal-types: hedonic narrative and instrumental narrative. Our findings demonstrate that these strategies influence both rational thinking (sense) and emotional engagement (sensibility). Hedonic narratives can have a negative impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them feel uncertain and consequently leading them to oppose the project, while instrumental narratives can have positive impact on citizens’ attitudes by making them informed and consequently leading them to supporting the project. Therefore, our findings highlight the significance of employing different narrative strategies, and the different effects of mobilizing the different narrative strategies vis-a-vis megaprojects in two institutional contexts. In addition, our study contributed to this special issue by mobilizing a novel comprehensive methodological approach Latent Dirichlet Algorithm (LDA), along with qualitative methods to gain insights into the complex dynamics of stakeholder behavior in megaprojects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Authoritarian leadership in projects: An integrated model to understand the team members’ task and innovative performance Overlooked and underused? The benefits and challenges of using causal mapping for project studies How does building information modeling influence decision-making process in the project design? An input, process and output analysis Space in project organising: Insights from planning within and between construction projects Governmentality in construction claim management: Role of smart data initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1