按风险组别对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的 Pentafecta 进行评估。

Víctor E Corona-Montes, Juan E Sánchez-Núñez, Rocío N Gómez-López, Gerardo Fernández-Noyola
{"title":"按风险组别对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的 Pentafecta 进行评估。","authors":"Víctor E Corona-Montes, Juan E Sánchez-Núñez, Rocío N Gómez-López, Gerardo Fernández-Noyola","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.22000583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pentafecta evaluation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by risk group.\",\"authors\":\"Víctor E Corona-Montes, Juan E Sánchez-Núñez, Rocío N Gómez-López, Gerardo Fernández-Noyola\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.22000583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.22000583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根治性前列腺切除术是器官封闭性前列腺癌的一种治疗方法。随着机器人系统的发展,该技术已开始影响泌尿科患者的功能和肿瘤治疗效果。本研究旨在报告接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的患者中,按风险组别分层的前列腺癌五联症发生率:方法:2013年至2020年的回顾性、观察性、描述性研究,纳入112名接受机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的患者:结果:随访12个月后,五级感染率为35.7%(n = 40)。在按风险组别进行的子分析中,低、中、高风险患者在随访1年后的五联症发生率分别为43%(26例)、26%(9例)和22%(4例):前列腺切除术的功能和肿瘤效果与文献报道的机器人方法相似,与前列腺癌的风险组别无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pentafecta evaluation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by risk group.

Objective: Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups.

Method: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP.

Results: A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively.

Conclusions: Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application value of opioid-free anesthesia in renal cyst decompression by laparoscopy. Exenatide improves cisplatin induced ovarian damage through NLRP3, Nrf-2, and TLR4 pathways. Investigation of the effect of ABO blood types on the prognosis of endometrioid-type endometrial cancer. Clinical efficacy of radiofrequency ablation guided by high-density mapping on persistent atrial fibrillation. Beneficial effects of IVIG treatment on experimental-induced osteoporosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1