Fidan Safalı, Serap Yurttaşer Ocak, Bora Deniz Argon, Gülderen Karaca, Mustafa Nuri Elçioğlu
{"title":"评估角膜过薄的角膜炎患者接受隐形眼镜辅助角膜交联治疗的效果。","authors":"Fidan Safalı, Serap Yurttaşer Ocak, Bora Deniz Argon, Gülderen Karaca, Mustafa Nuri Elçioğlu","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01055-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of accelerated contact lens-assisted cross-linking (CA-CXL) with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A lenses in keratoconus (KC) patients with thin corneas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 51 eyes of 39 KC patients with corneal thickness <400µm after epithelial scraping (Epi-off), who underwent accelerated CA-CXL treatment with Lotrafilcon B (n=20) and Comfilcon A (n=31). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), manifest refraction values, corneal topographic data and endothelial cell density were recorded at preoperative and postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th month controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDVA in the Comfilcon A group was higher than CDVA before surgery at 6 months postoperatively (p<0.001). When the two lenses were compared, CDVA was found to be significantly higher in the Lotrafilcon B group in the preoperative, postoperative 1st month and 3rd month values, but there was no significant difference between the postoperative 6th month values (p=0.028, p=0.018, p=0.044, p=0.181, respectively). The maximum keratometry (Kmax) value at the 6th month after surgery in the Comfilcon A group was significantly lower than in the Lotrafilcon B group (p=0,009). There was no significant difference between the endothelial cell density values between the groups (p=0.623, p=0.609, p=0.794, p=0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference between the progression, regression, and stability rates of the two groups (p=0.714).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerated CA-CXL with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses is a safe and effective method to stop progression in patients with thin corneas.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the results of contact lens assisted corneal cross-linking treatment in keratoconus patients with thin corneas.\",\"authors\":\"Fidan Safalı, Serap Yurttaşer Ocak, Bora Deniz Argon, Gülderen Karaca, Mustafa Nuri Elçioğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10384-024-01055-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of accelerated contact lens-assisted cross-linking (CA-CXL) with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A lenses in keratoconus (KC) patients with thin corneas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 51 eyes of 39 KC patients with corneal thickness <400µm after epithelial scraping (Epi-off), who underwent accelerated CA-CXL treatment with Lotrafilcon B (n=20) and Comfilcon A (n=31). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), manifest refraction values, corneal topographic data and endothelial cell density were recorded at preoperative and postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th month controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDVA in the Comfilcon A group was higher than CDVA before surgery at 6 months postoperatively (p<0.001). When the two lenses were compared, CDVA was found to be significantly higher in the Lotrafilcon B group in the preoperative, postoperative 1st month and 3rd month values, but there was no significant difference between the postoperative 6th month values (p=0.028, p=0.018, p=0.044, p=0.181, respectively). The maximum keratometry (Kmax) value at the 6th month after surgery in the Comfilcon A group was significantly lower than in the Lotrafilcon B group (p=0,009). There was no significant difference between the endothelial cell density values between the groups (p=0.623, p=0.609, p=0.794, p=0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference between the progression, regression, and stability rates of the two groups (p=0.714).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerated CA-CXL with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses is a safe and effective method to stop progression in patients with thin corneas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01055-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01055-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们旨在比较在角膜较薄的角膜病(KC)患者中使用 Lotrafilcon B 和 Comfilcon A 镜片进行加速接触镜辅助交联(CA-CXL)的疗效和安全性:研究设计:回顾性单中心研究:我们回顾性地纳入了 39 名角膜厚度较薄的 KC 患者的 51 只眼睛:结果:Comfilcon A 组术后 6 个月的 CDVA 高于术前(p):使用 Lotrafilcon B 和 Comfilcon A 硅水凝胶镜片加速 CA-CXL 是阻止角膜过薄患者病情恶化的一种安全有效的方法。
Evaluation of the results of contact lens assisted corneal cross-linking treatment in keratoconus patients with thin corneas.
Purpose: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of accelerated contact lens-assisted cross-linking (CA-CXL) with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A lenses in keratoconus (KC) patients with thin corneas.
Study design: Retrospective, single-center study.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively included 51 eyes of 39 KC patients with corneal thickness <400µm after epithelial scraping (Epi-off), who underwent accelerated CA-CXL treatment with Lotrafilcon B (n=20) and Comfilcon A (n=31). Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), manifest refraction values, corneal topographic data and endothelial cell density were recorded at preoperative and postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th month controls.
Results: CDVA in the Comfilcon A group was higher than CDVA before surgery at 6 months postoperatively (p<0.001). When the two lenses were compared, CDVA was found to be significantly higher in the Lotrafilcon B group in the preoperative, postoperative 1st month and 3rd month values, but there was no significant difference between the postoperative 6th month values (p=0.028, p=0.018, p=0.044, p=0.181, respectively). The maximum keratometry (Kmax) value at the 6th month after surgery in the Comfilcon A group was significantly lower than in the Lotrafilcon B group (p=0,009). There was no significant difference between the endothelial cell density values between the groups (p=0.623, p=0.609, p=0.794, p=0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference between the progression, regression, and stability rates of the two groups (p=0.714).
Conclusions: Accelerated CA-CXL with Lotrafilcon B and Comfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses is a safe and effective method to stop progression in patients with thin corneas.
期刊介绍:
The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication.
Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.