食品和农业中的基因组编辑:从法规到消费者视角

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Current opinion in biotechnology Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103127
Alice O Atimango , Joshua Wesana , Stephen W Kalule , Wim Verbeke , Hans De Steur
{"title":"食品和农业中的基因组编辑:从法规到消费者视角","authors":"Alice O Atimango ,&nbsp;Joshua Wesana ,&nbsp;Stephen W Kalule ,&nbsp;Wim Verbeke ,&nbsp;Hans De Steur","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Genome editing (GE) has emerged as a technology that could revolutionize food and agricultural production. While its advent has evoked enthusiasm for a more sustainable food system, there exists heterogeneity in regulations and public opinions regarding the technology. This review discusses evidence on the implications of government regulations on GE, and perceptions of genome-edited (GEd) food and related regulations. The review highlights consumers’ positive attitude and preference for GEd foods when compared with genetically modified foods, despite the limited awareness and knowledge of GE technology. While policy changes might trigger debates, providing tailored benefits, information to consumers could further improve their attitude toward GE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10833,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in biotechnology","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103127"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Alice O Atimango ,&nbsp;Joshua Wesana ,&nbsp;Stephen W Kalule ,&nbsp;Wim Verbeke ,&nbsp;Hans De Steur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Genome editing (GE) has emerged as a technology that could revolutionize food and agricultural production. While its advent has evoked enthusiasm for a more sustainable food system, there exists heterogeneity in regulations and public opinions regarding the technology. This review discusses evidence on the implications of government regulations on GE, and perceptions of genome-edited (GEd) food and related regulations. The review highlights consumers’ positive attitude and preference for GEd foods when compared with genetically modified foods, despite the limited awareness and knowledge of GE technology. While policy changes might trigger debates, providing tailored benefits, information to consumers could further improve their attitude toward GE.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166924000636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组编辑(GE)技术的出现可以彻底改变食品和农业生产。虽然它的出现唤起了人们对更可持续的食品系统的热情,但有关该技术的法规和公众意见却存在差异。本综述讨论了有关政府对通用电气的监管影响的证据,以及对基因组编辑(GEd)食品和相关法规的看法。综述强调,与转基因食品相比,尽管消费者对转基因技术的认识和了解有限,但他们对基因组编辑食品持积极态度和偏好。虽然政策变化可能会引发争论,但向消费者提供有针对性的利益和信息,可以进一步改善他们对基因改造食品的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives

Genome editing (GE) has emerged as a technology that could revolutionize food and agricultural production. While its advent has evoked enthusiasm for a more sustainable food system, there exists heterogeneity in regulations and public opinions regarding the technology. This review discusses evidence on the implications of government regulations on GE, and perceptions of genome-edited (GEd) food and related regulations. The review highlights consumers’ positive attitude and preference for GEd foods when compared with genetically modified foods, despite the limited awareness and knowledge of GE technology. While policy changes might trigger debates, providing tailored benefits, information to consumers could further improve their attitude toward GE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in biotechnology
Current opinion in biotechnology 工程技术-生化研究方法
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Biotechnology (COBIOT) is renowned for publishing authoritative, comprehensive, and systematic reviews. By offering clear and readable syntheses of current advances in biotechnology, COBIOT assists specialists in staying updated on the latest developments in the field. Expert authors annotate the most noteworthy papers from the vast array of information available today, providing readers with valuable insights and saving them time. As part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals, COBIOT is accompanied by the open-access primary research journal, Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT). Leveraging the editorial excellence, high impact, and global reach of the Current Opinion legacy, CO+RE journals ensure they are widely read resources integral to scientists' workflows. COBIOT is organized into themed sections, each reviewed once a year. These themes cover various areas of biotechnology, including analytical biotechnology, plant biotechnology, food biotechnology, energy biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, systems biology, nanobiotechnology, tissue, cell, and pathway engineering, chemical biotechnology, and pharmaceutical biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
A biotechnological perspective on sand filtration for drinking water production National phosphorus planning for food and environmental security Engineering next-generation chimeric antigen receptor-T cells: recent breakthroughs and remaining challenges in design and screening of novel chimeric antigen receptor variants Review: can bioelectrochemical sensors be used to monitor soil microbiome activity and fertility? Engineering T-cell receptor–like antibodies for biologics and cell therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1