{"title":"探索抑郁症与风险决策之间的复杂关系:荟萃分析","authors":"Tao Wang, Jianmin Zeng, Yujie Yuan, Ying He, Jiayi Zhu, Beitong Lin, Qiao Yin, Peiru Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous studies have examined the association between depression and risky decision-making, but the results are mixed. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of risky decision-making in individuals with current Major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD exhibit divergent performances in risky decision-making across various tasks. Specifically, MDD patients tend to select the disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>SMD</em> = 0.40; 95%<em>CI</em> = 0.09 to 0.70; <em>p</em> = 0.011), make fewer pumps on the balloon in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>SMD</em> = -0.29; 95%<em>CI</em> = -0.47 to -0.12; <em>p</em> < 0.01), and demonstrate similar performance in the Cambridge Gambling Task and the Game of Dice Task when compared to healthy controls. The meta-regression analysis revealed that age exhibits a significant correlation with the effect size in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>z</em> = 2.375, <em>p</em> = 0.018, 95%<em>CI</em> = [0.004,0.043]). The subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in effect sizes among age groups within both the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>Q</em> = 9.34, <em>df</em> = 3, <em>p</em> = 0.025) and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>Q</em> = 6.48, <em>df</em> = 1, <em>p</em> = 0.011). These findings indicate that MDD might impair the distinct process of risky decision-making, and age may paly vital role in the performance of MDD patients in risky decision-making. Understanding this could potentially facilitate more effective clinical interventions, thus reducing the burden on society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X/pdfft?md5=c9d26e13234bca02c0c6da475ba6672d&pid=1-s2.0-S266691532400057X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the complex relationship between depression and risky decision-making: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tao Wang, Jianmin Zeng, Yujie Yuan, Ying He, Jiayi Zhu, Beitong Lin, Qiao Yin, Peiru Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Numerous studies have examined the association between depression and risky decision-making, but the results are mixed. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of risky decision-making in individuals with current Major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD exhibit divergent performances in risky decision-making across various tasks. Specifically, MDD patients tend to select the disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>SMD</em> = 0.40; 95%<em>CI</em> = 0.09 to 0.70; <em>p</em> = 0.011), make fewer pumps on the balloon in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>SMD</em> = -0.29; 95%<em>CI</em> = -0.47 to -0.12; <em>p</em> < 0.01), and demonstrate similar performance in the Cambridge Gambling Task and the Game of Dice Task when compared to healthy controls. The meta-regression analysis revealed that age exhibits a significant correlation with the effect size in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>z</em> = 2.375, <em>p</em> = 0.018, 95%<em>CI</em> = [0.004,0.043]). The subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in effect sizes among age groups within both the Iowa Gambling Task (<em>Q</em> = 9.34, <em>df</em> = 3, <em>p</em> = 0.025) and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (<em>Q</em> = 6.48, <em>df</em> = 1, <em>p</em> = 0.011). These findings indicate that MDD might impair the distinct process of risky decision-making, and age may paly vital role in the performance of MDD patients in risky decision-making. Understanding this could potentially facilitate more effective clinical interventions, thus reducing the burden on society.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X/pdfft?md5=c9d26e13234bca02c0c6da475ba6672d&pid=1-s2.0-S266691532400057X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691532400057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the complex relationship between depression and risky decision-making: A meta-analysis
Numerous studies have examined the association between depression and risky decision-making, but the results are mixed. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of risky decision-making in individuals with current Major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with MDD exhibit divergent performances in risky decision-making across various tasks. Specifically, MDD patients tend to select the disadvantageous decks in the Iowa Gambling Task (SMD = 0.40; 95%CI = 0.09 to 0.70; p = 0.011), make fewer pumps on the balloon in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (SMD = -0.29; 95%CI = -0.47 to -0.12; p < 0.01), and demonstrate similar performance in the Cambridge Gambling Task and the Game of Dice Task when compared to healthy controls. The meta-regression analysis revealed that age exhibits a significant correlation with the effect size in the Balloon Analog Risk Task (z = 2.375, p = 0.018, 95%CI = [0.004,0.043]). The subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in effect sizes among age groups within both the Iowa Gambling Task (Q = 9.34, df = 3, p = 0.025) and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (Q = 6.48, df = 1, p = 0.011). These findings indicate that MDD might impair the distinct process of risky decision-making, and age may paly vital role in the performance of MDD patients in risky decision-making. Understanding this could potentially facilitate more effective clinical interventions, thus reducing the burden on society.