竞争零售商的统一定价是否公平?

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Consumer Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1111/ijcs.13043
Phoebe Wong, Markus Vanharanta, Peggy M. L. Ng, Tony Wong
{"title":"竞争零售商的统一定价是否公平?","authors":"Phoebe Wong,&nbsp;Markus Vanharanta,&nbsp;Peggy M. L. Ng,&nbsp;Tony Wong","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.13043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the enormous negative economic influence on consumer well-being, price-fixing remains a largely unexplored area in consumer research. Previous research showed that consumers perceive different prices for the same product as unfair. However, our findings counterintuitively indicate that consumers may also perceive uniform prices as unfair. Two experimental studies examined the effect of price uniformity (uniform/nonuniform) and price patterns over time (increase/no change) on the perception of price unfairness and third-party complaint intention. The findings show that consumers perceive prices as unfair when retailers increase a uniform price simultaneously. This pricing strategy by retailers increases consumers' intention to report suspected price-fixing activities to authorities, that is, third-party reporting. Based on the findings, implications for marketing practices and tactics to enhance public policy are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is uniform pricing by competing retailers perceived as fair?\",\"authors\":\"Phoebe Wong,&nbsp;Markus Vanharanta,&nbsp;Peggy M. L. Ng,&nbsp;Tony Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.13043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite the enormous negative economic influence on consumer well-being, price-fixing remains a largely unexplored area in consumer research. Previous research showed that consumers perceive different prices for the same product as unfair. However, our findings counterintuitively indicate that consumers may also perceive uniform prices as unfair. Two experimental studies examined the effect of price uniformity (uniform/nonuniform) and price patterns over time (increase/no change) on the perception of price unfairness and third-party complaint intention. The findings show that consumers perceive prices as unfair when retailers increase a uniform price simultaneously. This pricing strategy by retailers increases consumers' intention to report suspected price-fixing activities to authorities, that is, third-party reporting. Based on the findings, implications for marketing practices and tactics to enhance public policy are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.13043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管价格垄断对消费者福祉产生了巨大的负面经济影响,但在消费者研究中,价格垄断仍是一个基本未被探索的领域。以往的研究表明,消费者认为同一产品的不同价格是不公平的。然而,我们的研究结果却反直觉地表明,消费者也可能认为统一价格是不公平的。两项实验研究考察了价格统一性(统一/不统一)和随时间变化的价格模式(增加/不变)对价格不公平感和第三方投诉意向的影响。研究结果表明,当零售商同时提高统一价格时,消费者会认为价格不公平。零售商的这种定价策略增加了消费者向有关部门举报涉嫌操纵价格活动(即第三方举报)的意向。根据研究结果,讨论了对营销实践和加强公共政策的策略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is uniform pricing by competing retailers perceived as fair?

Despite the enormous negative economic influence on consumer well-being, price-fixing remains a largely unexplored area in consumer research. Previous research showed that consumers perceive different prices for the same product as unfair. However, our findings counterintuitively indicate that consumers may also perceive uniform prices as unfair. Two experimental studies examined the effect of price uniformity (uniform/nonuniform) and price patterns over time (increase/no change) on the perception of price unfairness and third-party complaint intention. The findings show that consumers perceive prices as unfair when retailers increase a uniform price simultaneously. This pricing strategy by retailers increases consumers' intention to report suspected price-fixing activities to authorities, that is, third-party reporting. Based on the findings, implications for marketing practices and tactics to enhance public policy are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Facebook and Consumer Research: A Review, AI-Driven Thematic Visualisation, and Research Agenda Mapping the Future of Tech-Infused Luxury: A Roadmap and Research Directions Influencer Marketing, Narrative Transportation, and Consumer Well-Being: An Exploration of How Virtual Influencers Impact Followers' Well-Being Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda Consumer Perspectives on Food Traceability—A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1