放射治疗中心员工 COVID-19 安全措施问卷的心理测量特性

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1007_22
Korosh Saber, F. Madadizadeh, Sepideh Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Rasool Azmoonfar, Nima Hamzian, Masoud Shabani
{"title":"放射治疗中心员工 COVID-19 安全措施问卷的心理测量特性","authors":"Korosh Saber, F. Madadizadeh, Sepideh Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Rasool Azmoonfar, Nima Hamzian, Masoud Shabani","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1007_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Due to the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on the continuation, schedule, and efficiency of radiation therapy, this study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the COVID-19 Safety Measures (CSM) questionnaire at the radiation therapy center.\n \n \n \n In this analytical cross-sectional study, which all personnel of the radiation therapy center (20 people) participated, the validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were investigated. Cultural adaptation, face validity, content validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were evaluated. For face and content validity, impact score, content validity ratio, and content validity index (CVR and CVI) were calculated, respectively. Also, internal consistency and stability reliability were calculated with Kuder–Richardson (KR20) alpha and Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 with a significant level of 5%.\n \n \n \n Out of 20 employees, 70% (14 people) were female, 75% (15 people) were married and the mean age (SD) was 32.4 (6.35) years. Scale-based Kuder–Richardson alpha, S-CVI, ICC, and confidence interval were 0.79, 0.97, 0.68, and 0.38–0.89, respectively.\n \n \n \n The validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were confirmed. Therefore, the application of this scale is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the COVID-19 safety measures questionnaire in the employees of the radiation therapy center\",\"authors\":\"Korosh Saber, F. Madadizadeh, Sepideh Abdollahi-Dehkordi, Rasool Azmoonfar, Nima Hamzian, Masoud Shabani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1007_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Due to the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on the continuation, schedule, and efficiency of radiation therapy, this study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the COVID-19 Safety Measures (CSM) questionnaire at the radiation therapy center.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this analytical cross-sectional study, which all personnel of the radiation therapy center (20 people) participated, the validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were investigated. Cultural adaptation, face validity, content validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were evaluated. For face and content validity, impact score, content validity ratio, and content validity index (CVR and CVI) were calculated, respectively. Also, internal consistency and stability reliability were calculated with Kuder–Richardson (KR20) alpha and Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 with a significant level of 5%.\\n \\n \\n \\n Out of 20 employees, 70% (14 people) were female, 75% (15 people) were married and the mean age (SD) was 32.4 (6.35) years. Scale-based Kuder–Richardson alpha, S-CVI, ICC, and confidence interval were 0.79, 0.97, 0.68, and 0.38–0.89, respectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n The validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were confirmed. Therefore, the application of this scale is recommended.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1007_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1007_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫情对放射治疗的持续性、进度和效率产生了影响,本研究旨在调查放射治疗中心 COVID-19 安全措施(CSM)问卷的可靠性和有效性。 在这项分析性横断面研究中,放射治疗中心的所有人员(20 人)都参与了研究,对 16 个项目的 CSM 问卷的有效性和可靠性进行了调查。对问卷的文化适应性、表面效度、内容效度、重测信度和内部一致性进行了评估。在面效度和内容效度方面,分别计算了影响得分、内容效度比率和内容效度指数(CVR 和 CVI)。此外,还分别用 Kuder-Richardson(KR20)α、皮尔逊相关系数和类内相关(ICC)计算了内部一致性和稳定性可靠性。数据分析采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)24 进行,显著性水平为 5%。 在 20 名员工中,70%(14 人)为女性,75%(15 人)已婚,平均年龄(SD)为 32.4(6.35)岁。量表的 Kuder-Richardson α、S-CVI、ICC 和置信区间分别为 0.79、0.97、0.68 和 0.38-0.89。 16 项 CSM 问卷的有效性和可靠性得到了证实。因此,建议应用该量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric properties of the COVID-19 safety measures questionnaire in the employees of the radiation therapy center
Due to the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on the continuation, schedule, and efficiency of radiation therapy, this study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the COVID-19 Safety Measures (CSM) questionnaire at the radiation therapy center. In this analytical cross-sectional study, which all personnel of the radiation therapy center (20 people) participated, the validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were investigated. Cultural adaptation, face validity, content validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were evaluated. For face and content validity, impact score, content validity ratio, and content validity index (CVR and CVI) were calculated, respectively. Also, internal consistency and stability reliability were calculated with Kuder–Richardson (KR20) alpha and Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 with a significant level of 5%. Out of 20 employees, 70% (14 people) were female, 75% (15 people) were married and the mean age (SD) was 32.4 (6.35) years. Scale-based Kuder–Richardson alpha, S-CVI, ICC, and confidence interval were 0.79, 0.97, 0.68, and 0.38–0.89, respectively. The validity and reliability of the 16-item CSM questionnaire were confirmed. Therefore, the application of this scale is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of training nursing process using the concept map on caring self-efficacy of nursing students in pediatric departments. Ethical and moral principles for oncology healthcare workers: A brief report from a Bioethics consortium emphasizing on need for education. Evaluation of antenatal care utilization and its effects on obstetric and newborn outcomes at a public and private hospital of Karnataka: A comparative study. Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review. Home-based supportive and health care services based on functional ability in older adults in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1