揭示人口健康干预措施中的有机意识形态:《2022 年健康与护理法案》中的水氟化规定案例

Conor Francis Macis
{"title":"揭示人口健康干预措施中的有机意识形态:《2022 年健康与护理法案》中的水氟化规定案例","authors":"Conor Francis Macis","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Departing from Keith Syrett’s article in this issue, this commentary critically considers the place of organic ideology in population health interventions, using water fluoridation provisions contained in the Health and Care Act 2022 as an example. It demonstrates that liberal capitalist and neoliberal capitalist conceptions of the state as protector ground these provisions and, in so doing, it shows that population health interventions must be grounded in resonant politico-philosophical ideas prior to considerations around the opening of a policy window. This comment concludes by noting the need for further work to grasp the positive and negative role of appealing to organic ideology in public health law, regulation and policy.","PeriodicalId":509896,"journal":{"name":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unearthing organic ideology in population health interventions: the case of water fluoridation provision in the Health and Care Act 2022\",\"authors\":\"Conor Francis Macis\",\"doi\":\"10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Departing from Keith Syrett’s article in this issue, this commentary critically considers the place of organic ideology in population health interventions, using water fluoridation provisions contained in the Health and Care Act 2022 as an example. It demonstrates that liberal capitalist and neoliberal capitalist conceptions of the state as protector ground these provisions and, in so doing, it shows that population health interventions must be grounded in resonant politico-philosophical ideas prior to considerations around the opening of a policy window. This comment concludes by noting the need for further work to grasp the positive and negative role of appealing to organic ideology in public health law, regulation and policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与凯斯-西雷特(Keith Syrett)在本期发表的文章不同,本评论以《2022 年健康与护理法案》中的水氟化规定为例,批判性地探讨了有机意识形态在人口健康干预中的地位。评论表明,自由资本主义和新自由主义资本主义关于国家作为保护者的观念是这些规定的基础,并以此表明,在考虑打开政策窗口之前,人口健康干预措施必须以能引起共鸣的政治哲学思想为基础。本评论最后指出,有必要进一步开展工作,以把握在公共卫生法律、法规和政策中诉诸有机意识形态的积极和消极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unearthing organic ideology in population health interventions: the case of water fluoridation provision in the Health and Care Act 2022
Departing from Keith Syrett’s article in this issue, this commentary critically considers the place of organic ideology in population health interventions, using water fluoridation provisions contained in the Health and Care Act 2022 as an example. It demonstrates that liberal capitalist and neoliberal capitalist conceptions of the state as protector ground these provisions and, in so doing, it shows that population health interventions must be grounded in resonant politico-philosophical ideas prior to considerations around the opening of a policy window. This comment concludes by noting the need for further work to grasp the positive and negative role of appealing to organic ideology in public health law, regulation and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Northern Ireland Executive: politics, law and a rethink of judicial intervention Fettering scrutiny on executive discretionary powers? Developments in the judicial reviewability of ministerial non-statutory guidance Inheriting the royals: royal chartered bodies in Ireland after 1922 The Union in court, Part 3: In Re Allister and Peeples’ Applications for Judicial Review [2023] UKSC 5 A continuing nuisance: Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd [2023] UKSC 16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1