轻度智力障碍至边缘智力功能患者的人格:一项比较研究

Kim P. Lie Sam Foek-Rambelje, Kirsten Copier, R. Didden, Esmay Haacke, Paul van der Heijden, Jos Egger
{"title":"轻度智力障碍至边缘智力功能患者的人格:一项比较研究","authors":"Kim P. Lie Sam Foek-Rambelje, Kirsten Copier, R. Didden, Esmay Haacke, Paul van der Heijden, Jos Egger","doi":"10.1108/amhid-10-2023-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the distinctive personality traits and characteristics of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) within specialized centers for MID-BIF treatment and care compared with individuals without MID-BIF diagnosis gathered from general mental health care (GMH) settings.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nPatients classified with MID-BIF (n = 58), most with comorbid psychopathology, were thoroughly interviewed by trained clinicians who afterward completed the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) about the patient. The authors compared SWAP-200 profiles of MID-BIF patients with profiles of GMH individuals. In addition, the authors have compared these profiles for the MID and BIF groups (differentiated based on previously known intelligence quotient scores).\n\n\nFindings\nResults show significantly higher scores for the MID-BIF group than the GMH group on scales encompassing emotional instability, impulsivity and antagonism. On scales containing constraint and healthy traits, significantly lower scores were found for the MID-BIF group than for the GMH group. Importance of including SWAP-200 personality assessment for a more comprehensive understanding and treatment planning for individuals with MID-BIF is discussed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study offers insights into personality within individuals with an MID-BIF diagnosis, compared with individuals in a GMH setting.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality in individuals with mild intellectual disability to borderline intellectual functioning: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Kim P. Lie Sam Foek-Rambelje, Kirsten Copier, R. Didden, Esmay Haacke, Paul van der Heijden, Jos Egger\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/amhid-10-2023-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate the distinctive personality traits and characteristics of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) within specialized centers for MID-BIF treatment and care compared with individuals without MID-BIF diagnosis gathered from general mental health care (GMH) settings.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nPatients classified with MID-BIF (n = 58), most with comorbid psychopathology, were thoroughly interviewed by trained clinicians who afterward completed the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) about the patient. The authors compared SWAP-200 profiles of MID-BIF patients with profiles of GMH individuals. In addition, the authors have compared these profiles for the MID and BIF groups (differentiated based on previously known intelligence quotient scores).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults show significantly higher scores for the MID-BIF group than the GMH group on scales encompassing emotional instability, impulsivity and antagonism. On scales containing constraint and healthy traits, significantly lower scores were found for the MID-BIF group than for the GMH group. Importance of including SWAP-200 personality assessment for a more comprehensive understanding and treatment planning for individuals with MID-BIF is discussed.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study offers insights into personality within individuals with an MID-BIF diagnosis, compared with individuals in a GMH setting.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-10-2023-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-10-2023-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在调查边缘智力功能(BIF)和轻度智力障碍(MID)患者在专门的MID-BIF治疗和护理中心与在普通精神健康护理(GMH)机构收集的未被诊断为MID-BIF的患者相比,其独特的人格特质和特征。设计/方法/途径被归类为MID-BIF的患者(n = 58)大多合并有精神病理学,他们接受了训练有素的临床医生的全面访谈,并在访谈后完成了有关患者的Shedler-Westen评估程序(SWAP-200)。作者将 MID-BIF 患者的 SWAP-200 资料与 GMH 患者的资料进行了比较。此外,作者还比较了 MID 组和 BIF 组(根据之前已知的智商分数进行区分)的情况。结果显示,MID-BIF 组在情绪不稳定性、冲动性和对抗性等量表上的得分明显高于 GMH 组。在包含约束和健康特质的量表上,MID-BIF 组的得分明显低于 GMH 组。本研究探讨了将 SWAP-200 人格评估纳入对 MID-BIF 患者更全面的了解和治疗规划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personality in individuals with mild intellectual disability to borderline intellectual functioning: a comparative study
Purpose This study aims to investigate the distinctive personality traits and characteristics of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) within specialized centers for MID-BIF treatment and care compared with individuals without MID-BIF diagnosis gathered from general mental health care (GMH) settings. Design/methodology/approach Patients classified with MID-BIF (n = 58), most with comorbid psychopathology, were thoroughly interviewed by trained clinicians who afterward completed the Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) about the patient. The authors compared SWAP-200 profiles of MID-BIF patients with profiles of GMH individuals. In addition, the authors have compared these profiles for the MID and BIF groups (differentiated based on previously known intelligence quotient scores). Findings Results show significantly higher scores for the MID-BIF group than the GMH group on scales encompassing emotional instability, impulsivity and antagonism. On scales containing constraint and healthy traits, significantly lower scores were found for the MID-BIF group than for the GMH group. Importance of including SWAP-200 personality assessment for a more comprehensive understanding and treatment planning for individuals with MID-BIF is discussed. Originality/value This study offers insights into personality within individuals with an MID-BIF diagnosis, compared with individuals in a GMH setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Gabapentin treatment for challenging behaviors in autism spectrum disorder and coexisting intellectual disability: a case report The effectiveness of family-based treatment and pharmacotherapy in an adolescent with anorexia nervosa and intellectual disability: a case report Health literacy in parents of children with Down syndrome STOMP during COVID-19: use of psychotropic medication in intellectual disabilities community services – pilot QI project Co-design and pilot of a virtual reality intervention to improve mental and physical healthcare accessibility for people with intellectual disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1