有机肥与稻壳生物炭的组合对超微土壤中大豆(Glycine Max L)的生长、产量、可利用氮和氮吸收的影响

Ernitha Panjaitan
{"title":"有机肥与稻壳生物炭的组合对超微土壤中大豆(Glycine Max L)的生长、产量、可利用氮和氮吸收的影响","authors":"Ernitha Panjaitan","doi":"10.59890/ijaeam.v2i1.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted on Jl. Bunga Sedap malam XVIII Medan North Sumatra with an altitude of ± 30 meters above sea level (masl), this research took place from February to April 2022. This study used the Non Factorial Randomized Group Design method. Factor B1 = Control, B2 = Organic fertilizer 15 tons/ha, B3 = Rice husk biochar 15 tons/ha, B4 = Organic fertilizer 12.5 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 2.5 tons/ha, B5 = Organic fertilizer 10 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 5 tons/ha, B6 = Organic fertilizer 7.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 7.5 tons/ha, B7 = Organic fertilizer 5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 10 tons/ha, B8 = Organic fertilizer 2.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 12.5 tons/ha. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the treatment of cow organic fertilizer and rice husk biochar had a significant effect on plant height, number of branches, root nodules, wet weight of pods/plot, dry weight of pods/plot, soil pH, base saturation (KB), and N absorbed, but had no significant effect on the number of filled pods, number of empty pods, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and N available. The average number of filled pods was highest in treatment B4 (36.67%) and lowest in treatment B1 (1.33%). The highest average cation exchange capacity (CEC) was found in treatment B2 (18.76m3/100g) and the lowest average was found in treatment B6 (10.79me/100g). The highest average available N was found in treatment B2 (4.13%) and the lowest was found in treatment B8 (3.15%).","PeriodicalId":507947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Economics, Accounting and Management (IJAEAM)","volume":"691 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Combination of Organic Fertilizer and Rice Husk Biochar on Growth, Production, Available N and N Absorption of Soybean (Glycine Max L) in Ultisol Soil\",\"authors\":\"Ernitha Panjaitan\",\"doi\":\"10.59890/ijaeam.v2i1.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted on Jl. Bunga Sedap malam XVIII Medan North Sumatra with an altitude of ± 30 meters above sea level (masl), this research took place from February to April 2022. This study used the Non Factorial Randomized Group Design method. Factor B1 = Control, B2 = Organic fertilizer 15 tons/ha, B3 = Rice husk biochar 15 tons/ha, B4 = Organic fertilizer 12.5 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 2.5 tons/ha, B5 = Organic fertilizer 10 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 5 tons/ha, B6 = Organic fertilizer 7.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 7.5 tons/ha, B7 = Organic fertilizer 5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 10 tons/ha, B8 = Organic fertilizer 2.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 12.5 tons/ha. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the treatment of cow organic fertilizer and rice husk biochar had a significant effect on plant height, number of branches, root nodules, wet weight of pods/plot, dry weight of pods/plot, soil pH, base saturation (KB), and N absorbed, but had no significant effect on the number of filled pods, number of empty pods, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and N available. The average number of filled pods was highest in treatment B4 (36.67%) and lowest in treatment B1 (1.33%). The highest average cation exchange capacity (CEC) was found in treatment B2 (18.76m3/100g) and the lowest average was found in treatment B6 (10.79me/100g). The highest average available N was found in treatment B2 (4.13%) and the lowest was found in treatment B8 (3.15%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":507947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Economics, Accounting and Management (IJAEAM)\",\"volume\":\"691 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Economics, Accounting and Management (IJAEAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaeam.v2i1.143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Economics, Accounting and Management (IJAEAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaeam.v2i1.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在北苏门答腊棉兰的 Jl. Bunga Sedap malam XVIII 进行,海拔高度为 ± 30 米(masl),研究时间为 2022 年 2 月至 4 月。本研究采用非因子随机分组设计法。因子 B1 = 对照组,B2 = 有机肥 15 吨/公顷,B3 = 稻壳生物炭 15 吨/公顷,B4 = 有机肥 12.5 吨/公顷 + 稻壳生物炭 2.5 吨/公顷,B5 = 有机肥 10 吨/公顷 + 稻壳生物炭 5 吨/公顷,B6 = 有机肥 7.5 吨/公顷 + 稻壳生物炭 7.5 吨/公顷,B7 = 有机肥 5 吨/公顷 + 稻壳生物炭 10 吨/公顷,B8 = 有机肥 2.5 吨/公顷 + 稻壳生物炭 12.5 吨/公顷。从研究结果可以得出结论,奶牛有机肥和稻壳生物炭处理对株高、分枝数、根瘤、每块地豆荚湿重、每块地豆荚干重、土壤 pH 值、碱饱和度(KB)和氮吸收量有显著影响,但对饱满豆荚数、空豆荚数、阳离子交换容量(CEC)和可用氮没有显著影响。处理 B4 的平均结荚数最高(36.67%),处理 B1 最低(1.33%)。处理 B2 的阳离子交换容量(CEC)平均值最高(18.76m3/100g),处理 B6 的平均值最低(10.79me/100g)。处理 B2 的平均可利用氮最高(4.13%),处理 B8 的平均可利用氮最低(3.15%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Combination of Organic Fertilizer and Rice Husk Biochar on Growth, Production, Available N and N Absorption of Soybean (Glycine Max L) in Ultisol Soil
This research was conducted on Jl. Bunga Sedap malam XVIII Medan North Sumatra with an altitude of ± 30 meters above sea level (masl), this research took place from February to April 2022. This study used the Non Factorial Randomized Group Design method. Factor B1 = Control, B2 = Organic fertilizer 15 tons/ha, B3 = Rice husk biochar 15 tons/ha, B4 = Organic fertilizer 12.5 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 2.5 tons/ha, B5 = Organic fertilizer 10 tons/ha + Rice husk biochar 5 tons/ha, B6 = Organic fertilizer 7.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 7.5 tons/ha, B7 = Organic fertilizer 5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 10 tons/ha, B8 = Organic fertilizer 2.5 tons/ha + Biochar rice husk 12.5 tons/ha. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the treatment of cow organic fertilizer and rice husk biochar had a significant effect on plant height, number of branches, root nodules, wet weight of pods/plot, dry weight of pods/plot, soil pH, base saturation (KB), and N absorbed, but had no significant effect on the number of filled pods, number of empty pods, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and N available. The average number of filled pods was highest in treatment B4 (36.67%) and lowest in treatment B1 (1.33%). The highest average cation exchange capacity (CEC) was found in treatment B2 (18.76m3/100g) and the lowest average was found in treatment B6 (10.79me/100g). The highest average available N was found in treatment B2 (4.13%) and the lowest was found in treatment B8 (3.15%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study on consumer attitude towards Smoking amongst Males and Females of Gen. Z in Ahmedabad A study on consumer attitude towards Smoking amongst Males and Females of Gen. Z in Ahmedabad Political Regime Types and Income Inequality in Pakistan The Contribution of Local Government Finance to the Islamic Human Development Index The Effect of Combination of Organic Fertilizer and Rice Husk Biochar on Growth, Production, Available N and N Absorption of Soybean (Glycine Max L) in Ultisol Soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1