Congwen Wang
(, ), Chi Xiao
(, ), Yujing Dai
(, ), Jun Wang
(, ), Hansong Ma
(, ), Yong Huan
(, ), Yan Huan
(, )
{"title":"不同尺寸橡胶/帘线H型拉拔试验界面参数的归一化处理评价方法","authors":"Congwen Wang \n (, ), Chi Xiao \n (, ), Yujing Dai \n (, ), Jun Wang \n (, ), Hansong Ma \n (, ), Yong Huan \n (, ), Yan Huan \n (, )","doi":"10.1007/s10409-023-23210-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>H pull-out test is widely employed as a primary method for estimating the adhesion value of the interface in the rubber/cord composites. However, the current international standards only require to record the pull-out force in rubber/cord H pull-out tests, and emphasize that results obtained from samples of different sizes are not comparable. In this paper, we investigate the comparability of H pull-out results from rubber/cord samples of varying samples and propose an evaluation method to normalize these results. Rubber/cord H pull-out tests of samples with the sizes of 5 mm, 6.4 mm, and 10 mm are undertaken respectively (the results of the specimens with dimensions of 7.5 mm and 8.5 mm are provided as supplementary information). Based on the test results, the adhesion values are analyzed by the model of cohesive elements in finite element method, and the cohesive parameters derived from these models are considered more accurate indicators of adhesion value than the pull-out force. Therefore, a more reasonable comparison of adhesion values becomes feasible. The cohesive parameters are initially determined using the 6.4 mm model and then applied to the other sample models. Good consistency can be seen between the simulations and the test results even though the sample sizes are changing, demonstrating that cohesive parameters remain unaffected by sample dimensions. Based on this, we develop a normalization method that enables the comparability of rubber/cord H pull-out results from samples of different sizes. The cohesive parameters provide a more accurate representation of the adhesion value, and the normalization method we propose serves as an extension of current experimental methods outlined in international standard.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7109,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A normalized evaluation method on the interface parameters of rubber/cord pull-out tests for different sized samples\",\"authors\":\"Congwen Wang \\n (, ), Chi Xiao \\n (, ), Yujing Dai \\n (, ), Jun Wang \\n (, ), Hansong Ma \\n (, ), Yong Huan \\n (, ), Yan Huan \\n (, )\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10409-023-23210-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>H pull-out test is widely employed as a primary method for estimating the adhesion value of the interface in the rubber/cord composites. However, the current international standards only require to record the pull-out force in rubber/cord H pull-out tests, and emphasize that results obtained from samples of different sizes are not comparable. In this paper, we investigate the comparability of H pull-out results from rubber/cord samples of varying samples and propose an evaluation method to normalize these results. Rubber/cord H pull-out tests of samples with the sizes of 5 mm, 6.4 mm, and 10 mm are undertaken respectively (the results of the specimens with dimensions of 7.5 mm and 8.5 mm are provided as supplementary information). Based on the test results, the adhesion values are analyzed by the model of cohesive elements in finite element method, and the cohesive parameters derived from these models are considered more accurate indicators of adhesion value than the pull-out force. Therefore, a more reasonable comparison of adhesion values becomes feasible. The cohesive parameters are initially determined using the 6.4 mm model and then applied to the other sample models. Good consistency can be seen between the simulations and the test results even though the sample sizes are changing, demonstrating that cohesive parameters remain unaffected by sample dimensions. Based on this, we develop a normalization method that enables the comparability of rubber/cord H pull-out results from samples of different sizes. The cohesive parameters provide a more accurate representation of the adhesion value, and the normalization method we propose serves as an extension of current experimental methods outlined in international standard.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Mechanica Sinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Mechanica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-023-23210-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10409-023-23210-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
H 拉出试验被广泛用作估算橡胶/帘线复合材料界面附着力值的主要方法。然而,目前的国际标准只要求记录橡胶/帘线 H 型拉拔试验中的拉拔力,并强调不同尺寸样品获得的结果不具有可比性。在本文中,我们研究了不同样本的橡胶/绳索样品的 H 拉出结果的可比性,并提出了对这些结果进行归一化的评估方法。我们分别对尺寸为 5 毫米、6.4 毫米和 10 毫米的样品进行了橡胶/软线 H 拉出试验(尺寸为 7.5 毫米和 8.5 毫米的样品的试验结果作为补充资料提供)。根据测试结果,用有限元法中的内聚元素模型对附着力值进行了分析,这些模型得出的内聚参数被认为是比拉拔力更准确的附着力值指标。因此,对附着力值进行更合理的比较是可行的。内聚力参数最初是通过 6.4 毫米模型确定的,然后应用于其他样品模型。即使样品尺寸发生变化,模拟结果与测试结果之间仍能保持良好的一致性,这表明内聚力参数不受样品尺寸的影响。在此基础上,我们开发了一种归一化方法,使不同尺寸样本的橡胶/绳 H 拉出结果具有可比性。内聚力参数能更准确地表示粘附力值,我们提出的归一化方法是对国际标准中概述的现行实验方法的扩展。
A normalized evaluation method on the interface parameters of rubber/cord pull-out tests for different sized samples
H pull-out test is widely employed as a primary method for estimating the adhesion value of the interface in the rubber/cord composites. However, the current international standards only require to record the pull-out force in rubber/cord H pull-out tests, and emphasize that results obtained from samples of different sizes are not comparable. In this paper, we investigate the comparability of H pull-out results from rubber/cord samples of varying samples and propose an evaluation method to normalize these results. Rubber/cord H pull-out tests of samples with the sizes of 5 mm, 6.4 mm, and 10 mm are undertaken respectively (the results of the specimens with dimensions of 7.5 mm and 8.5 mm are provided as supplementary information). Based on the test results, the adhesion values are analyzed by the model of cohesive elements in finite element method, and the cohesive parameters derived from these models are considered more accurate indicators of adhesion value than the pull-out force. Therefore, a more reasonable comparison of adhesion values becomes feasible. The cohesive parameters are initially determined using the 6.4 mm model and then applied to the other sample models. Good consistency can be seen between the simulations and the test results even though the sample sizes are changing, demonstrating that cohesive parameters remain unaffected by sample dimensions. Based on this, we develop a normalization method that enables the comparability of rubber/cord H pull-out results from samples of different sizes. The cohesive parameters provide a more accurate representation of the adhesion value, and the normalization method we propose serves as an extension of current experimental methods outlined in international standard.
期刊介绍:
Acta Mechanica Sinica, sponsored by the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, promotes scientific exchanges and collaboration among Chinese scientists in China and abroad. It features high quality, original papers in all aspects of mechanics and mechanical sciences.
Not only does the journal explore the classical subdivisions of theoretical and applied mechanics such as solid and fluid mechanics, it also explores recently emerging areas such as biomechanics and nanomechanics. In addition, the journal investigates analytical, computational, and experimental progresses in all areas of mechanics. Lastly, it encourages research in interdisciplinary subjects, serving as a bridge between mechanics and other branches of engineering and the sciences.
In addition to research papers, Acta Mechanica Sinica publishes reviews, notes, experimental techniques, scientific events, and other special topics of interest.
Related subjects » Classical Continuum Physics - Computational Intelligence and Complexity - Mechanics