经修订的在线学习准备量表(OLRS)的实证有效性和内部一致性测试

Agil Abdur Rohim, O. Purwati, S. Anam, Suhartono Suhartono
{"title":"经修订的在线学习准备量表(OLRS)的实证有效性和内部一致性测试","authors":"Agil Abdur Rohim, O. Purwati, S. Anam, Suhartono Suhartono","doi":"10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five dimensions of Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) offers convincing quantification of online students’ readiness. Its modification, the addition of two more dimension, is even claimed to be applicable for blended learning environment. Nonetheless, quality of modified OLRS is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assure the quality of OLRS after the modification. In order to do so, empirical validity and internal consistency testing were conducted. 42 participants were included for the testing. The result showed that there are four items which needs special attention. The reliability value is also slightly decreased, from .85 to .74. The value is not ideal, but still widely acceptable for research usage. In short, the OLRS modification insignificantly reduces the quality of its psychometric properties. Further research is recommended by the author to focus on reformulating the items in order to enhance its empirical validity and reliability simultaneously, or conducting other statistical test to maintain the quality of OLRS.","PeriodicalId":432026,"journal":{"name":"TELL-US JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMPIRICAL VALIDITY AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY TESTING OF MODIFIED ONLINE LEARNING READINESS SCALE (OLRS)\",\"authors\":\"Agil Abdur Rohim, O. Purwati, S. Anam, Suhartono Suhartono\",\"doi\":\"10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Five dimensions of Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) offers convincing quantification of online students’ readiness. Its modification, the addition of two more dimension, is even claimed to be applicable for blended learning environment. Nonetheless, quality of modified OLRS is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assure the quality of OLRS after the modification. In order to do so, empirical validity and internal consistency testing were conducted. 42 participants were included for the testing. The result showed that there are four items which needs special attention. The reliability value is also slightly decreased, from .85 to .74. The value is not ideal, but still widely acceptable for research usage. In short, the OLRS modification insignificantly reduces the quality of its psychometric properties. Further research is recommended by the author to focus on reformulating the items in order to enhance its empirical validity and reliability simultaneously, or conducting other statistical test to maintain the quality of OLRS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TELL-US JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TELL-US JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TELL-US JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线学习准备度量表(OLRS)的五个维度提供了令人信服的在线学生准备度量化指标。该量表经过修改,增加了两个维度,甚至声称适用于混合式学习环境。然而,修改后的 OLRS 的质量值得怀疑。因此,本研究的目的是确保修改后的 OLRS 的质量。为此,我们进行了经验效度和内部一致性测试。42 名参与者参与了测试。结果显示,有四个项目需要特别注意。信度值也略有下降,从 0.85 降至 0.74。该值虽不理想,但仍可广泛用于研究。总之,OLRS 的修改并没有显著降低其心理测量特性的质量。笔者建议进一步研究的重点是重新制定项目,以同时提高其经验效度和信度,或进行其他统计检验以保持 OLRS 的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMPIRICAL VALIDITY AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY TESTING OF MODIFIED ONLINE LEARNING READINESS SCALE (OLRS)
Five dimensions of Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) offers convincing quantification of online students’ readiness. Its modification, the addition of two more dimension, is even claimed to be applicable for blended learning environment. Nonetheless, quality of modified OLRS is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assure the quality of OLRS after the modification. In order to do so, empirical validity and internal consistency testing were conducted. 42 participants were included for the testing. The result showed that there are four items which needs special attention. The reliability value is also slightly decreased, from .85 to .74. The value is not ideal, but still widely acceptable for research usage. In short, the OLRS modification insignificantly reduces the quality of its psychometric properties. Further research is recommended by the author to focus on reformulating the items in order to enhance its empirical validity and reliability simultaneously, or conducting other statistical test to maintain the quality of OLRS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OPTIMIZING THE USE OF AUTHENTIC MATERIALS IN THE WORD FORMATION PROCESS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING IN THE ENGLISH MORPHOLOGY SUBJECT EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LISTENING COURSES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC DEMYSTIFYING STUDENT NEEDS IN NON-ENGLISH PROGRAMS FOR ENGLISH-SPECIFIC PURPOSES CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES BETWEEN AN EFL TEACHER’S BELIEFS AND CLASSROOM PRACTICES IN TEACHING SPEAKING EXPLORING OF LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE IN ELEMENTARY LEARNERS: CHALLENGES AND BARRIERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1