从逆境商数看初中学生对二元线性方程组(SPLDV)的认识障碍分析

Fitri Alyani, Afiful Haidar
{"title":"从逆境商数看初中学生对二元线性方程组(SPLDV)的认识障碍分析","authors":"Fitri Alyani, Afiful Haidar","doi":"10.31000/prima.v8i1.9033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine students' epistemological barriers in the material system of two-variable linear equations (SPLDV) in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This research method uses descriptive qualitative. The subjects in this study were 6 students who were selected based on their level, namely Adversity Quotient Climber, Adversity Quotient Camper, and Adversity Quotient Quitter. Researchers used questionnaires, written tests and interviews to determine the extent to which subjects had epistemological barriers and Adversity Quotient (AQ). Then, the data analysis techniques used the Winstep application on questionnaires and written tests, then interviews used data reduction analysis, data collection, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study, namely: a) Students who have high epistemological barriers, have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; b) Students who have moderate epistemological barriers have operational epistemological barriers; c) Students who have low epistemological barriers, do not have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; d) Students with Adversity Quotient Climbers do not yet have low epistemological barriers, as well as Adversity Quotient Campers and Quitters who do not necessarily have moderate and high epistemological barriers; e) Factors that affect the Adversity Quotient and this epistemological barrier is how students understand the material provided by educators. This research can be a source of information and reference for readers.Keywords: Epistemological Barriers, System of Two Variable Linear Equations, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)","PeriodicalId":518986,"journal":{"name":"Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"332 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ EPISTIMOLOGICAL BARRIERS TO SYSTEMS OF TWO VARIABLES LINEAR EQUATIONS (SPLDV) VIEWED FROM ADVERSITY QUOTIENT IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL\",\"authors\":\"Fitri Alyani, Afiful Haidar\",\"doi\":\"10.31000/prima.v8i1.9033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine students' epistemological barriers in the material system of two-variable linear equations (SPLDV) in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This research method uses descriptive qualitative. The subjects in this study were 6 students who were selected based on their level, namely Adversity Quotient Climber, Adversity Quotient Camper, and Adversity Quotient Quitter. Researchers used questionnaires, written tests and interviews to determine the extent to which subjects had epistemological barriers and Adversity Quotient (AQ). Then, the data analysis techniques used the Winstep application on questionnaires and written tests, then interviews used data reduction analysis, data collection, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study, namely: a) Students who have high epistemological barriers, have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; b) Students who have moderate epistemological barriers have operational epistemological barriers; c) Students who have low epistemological barriers, do not have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; d) Students with Adversity Quotient Climbers do not yet have low epistemological barriers, as well as Adversity Quotient Campers and Quitters who do not necessarily have moderate and high epistemological barriers; e) Factors that affect the Adversity Quotient and this epistemological barrier is how students understand the material provided by educators. This research can be a source of information and reference for readers.Keywords: Epistemological Barriers, System of Two Variable Linear Equations, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)\",\"PeriodicalId\":518986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika\",\"volume\":\"332 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v8i1.9033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v8i1.9033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从逆境商数(AQ)的角度确定学生在双变量线性方程组(SPLDV)材料系统中的认识论障碍。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法。研究对象为 6 名学生,根据他们的水平进行选择,即逆境商数攀登者、逆境商数露营者和逆境商数放弃者。研究人员通过问卷调查、书面测试和访谈来确定受试者的认识论障碍程度和逆境商数(AQ)。然后,在问卷和书面测试中使用 Winstep 应用程序进行数据分析,在访谈中使用数据还原分析、数据收集和得出结论。本研究的结果,即a)认识论障碍高的学生,在概念上、程序上和操作上都存在认识论障碍;b)认识论障碍中等的学生,在操作上存在认识论障碍;c)认识论障碍低的学生,在概念上、程序上和操作上都不存在认识论障碍;d) 逆境商数攀登者的学生还没有低认识论障碍,逆境商数露营者和放弃者也不一定有中等和高认识论障碍; e) 影响逆境商数和这种认识论障碍的因素是学生如何理解教育者提供的材料。本研究可为读者提供信息和参考:认识论障碍、二元线性方程组和逆境商数(AQ)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ EPISTIMOLOGICAL BARRIERS TO SYSTEMS OF TWO VARIABLES LINEAR EQUATIONS (SPLDV) VIEWED FROM ADVERSITY QUOTIENT IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
This study aims to determine students' epistemological barriers in the material system of two-variable linear equations (SPLDV) in terms of Adversity Quotient (AQ). This research method uses descriptive qualitative. The subjects in this study were 6 students who were selected based on their level, namely Adversity Quotient Climber, Adversity Quotient Camper, and Adversity Quotient Quitter. Researchers used questionnaires, written tests and interviews to determine the extent to which subjects had epistemological barriers and Adversity Quotient (AQ). Then, the data analysis techniques used the Winstep application on questionnaires and written tests, then interviews used data reduction analysis, data collection, and drawing conclusions. The results of this study, namely: a) Students who have high epistemological barriers, have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; b) Students who have moderate epistemological barriers have operational epistemological barriers; c) Students who have low epistemological barriers, do not have epistemological barriers conceptually, procedurally, and operationally; d) Students with Adversity Quotient Climbers do not yet have low epistemological barriers, as well as Adversity Quotient Campers and Quitters who do not necessarily have moderate and high epistemological barriers; e) Factors that affect the Adversity Quotient and this epistemological barrier is how students understand the material provided by educators. This research can be a source of information and reference for readers.Keywords: Epistemological Barriers, System of Two Variable Linear Equations, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ EPISTIMOLOGICAL BARRIERS TO SYSTEMS OF TWO VARIABLES LINEAR EQUATIONS (SPLDV) VIEWED FROM ADVERSITY QUOTIENT IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ASK AND CLARIFY ABOUT STUDENT SHARING OF THE CONCEPT OF REFLECTION ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' ERROR IN WORKING ON MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS BASED ON THE CIRCULAR MATERIAL BASED ON KASTOLAN THEORY DEVELOPMENT OF E-BOOKS INTEGRATED WITH HABIST OF MIND AND ISLAMIC CHARACTERS IN IMPROVING ALGEBRAIC THINKING SKILLS OF PROSPECTIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1