在所有错误的地方寻找转移:如何通过老年人的不同经历提高智力

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101829
Elizabeth A.L. Stine-Morrow, Ilber E. Manavbasi, Shukhan Ng, Giavanna S. McCall, Aron K. Barbey, Daniel G. Morrow
{"title":"在所有错误的地方寻找转移:如何通过老年人的不同经历提高智力","authors":"Elizabeth A.L. Stine-Morrow,&nbsp;Ilber E. Manavbasi,&nbsp;Shukhan Ng,&nbsp;Giavanna S. McCall,&nbsp;Aron K. Barbey,&nbsp;Daniel G. Morrow","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research with cognitive training for older adults has largely shown that benefits are confined to the skills that are directly practiced with little or no generalization (or “transfer”) to other skills. However, investigations typically rely on pre-post designs in which the effects of training on non-practiced skills can only be revealed in the initial encounter with the novel task after training. The principle of mutualism suggests that growth in one cognitive skill may potentiate plasticity in related skills, such that transfer may only emerge with practice on the novel skill. We introduce a successive enrichment paradigm in which learning on a target skill (here, working memory (WM)) is examined as a function of earlier training experiences. Older adults were randomly assigned to one of four groups who trained on different combinations of tasks before training on a verbal WM task. Practice with any combination of WM tasks accelerated learning of the target task relative to a verbal decision speed control. Furthermore, those who first practiced multiple WM span tasks that were different from the target task showed larger pre- to posttest gain on the target WM task relative to those with prior exposure to only one different WM task or even the exact same WM task as the target. However, these effects only emerged with practice on the novel task. These data provide support for the mutualism principle — a conceptualization of transfer that can explain the emergence of the positive manifold of cognitive abilities, and offers promise for new pathways to promote late-life cognitive health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000230/pdfft?md5=bbef3cb8f65becd8afe21bebe8d4f234&pid=1-s2.0-S0160289624000230-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking for transfer in all the wrong places: How intellectual abilities can be enhanced through diverse experience among older adults\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A.L. Stine-Morrow,&nbsp;Ilber E. Manavbasi,&nbsp;Shukhan Ng,&nbsp;Giavanna S. McCall,&nbsp;Aron K. Barbey,&nbsp;Daniel G. Morrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research with cognitive training for older adults has largely shown that benefits are confined to the skills that are directly practiced with little or no generalization (or “transfer”) to other skills. However, investigations typically rely on pre-post designs in which the effects of training on non-practiced skills can only be revealed in the initial encounter with the novel task after training. The principle of mutualism suggests that growth in one cognitive skill may potentiate plasticity in related skills, such that transfer may only emerge with practice on the novel skill. We introduce a successive enrichment paradigm in which learning on a target skill (here, working memory (WM)) is examined as a function of earlier training experiences. Older adults were randomly assigned to one of four groups who trained on different combinations of tasks before training on a verbal WM task. Practice with any combination of WM tasks accelerated learning of the target task relative to a verbal decision speed control. Furthermore, those who first practiced multiple WM span tasks that were different from the target task showed larger pre- to posttest gain on the target WM task relative to those with prior exposure to only one different WM task or even the exact same WM task as the target. However, these effects only emerged with practice on the novel task. These data provide support for the mutualism principle — a conceptualization of transfer that can explain the emergence of the positive manifold of cognitive abilities, and offers promise for new pathways to promote late-life cognitive health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000230/pdfft?md5=bbef3cb8f65becd8afe21bebe8d4f234&pid=1-s2.0-S0160289624000230-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对老年人进行认知训练的研究大多表明,受益仅限于直接练习的技能,很少或根本没有向其他技能的泛化(或 "迁移")。然而,调查通常依赖于前-后设计,在这种设计中,训练对非练习技能的影响只能在训练后初次接触新任务时才能显现出来。互利原则表明,一种认知技能的增长可能会促进相关技能的可塑性,因此只有在练习新技能时才会出现迁移。我们引入了一种连续强化范式,将目标技能(此处指工作记忆(WM))的学习作为早期训练经验的函数进行检验。老年人被随机分配到四组中的一组,他们在接受言语工作记忆任务训练之前先接受不同任务组合的训练。与言语决策速度对照组相比,任何WM任务组合的练习都能加速目标任务的学习。此外,与那些之前只接触过一个不同的 WM 任务,甚至是与目标任务完全相同的 WM 任务的人相比,那些首先练习了与目标任务不同的多个 WM 跨度任务的人在目标 WM 任务上的测试前和测试后收益更大。然而,这些效应只有在新任务的练习中才会出现。这些数据为 "相互性原则 "提供了支持--"相互性原则 "是一种迁移概念,可以解释认知能力积极多面性的出现,并为促进晚年认知健康的新途径提供了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Looking for transfer in all the wrong places: How intellectual abilities can be enhanced through diverse experience among older adults

Research with cognitive training for older adults has largely shown that benefits are confined to the skills that are directly practiced with little or no generalization (or “transfer”) to other skills. However, investigations typically rely on pre-post designs in which the effects of training on non-practiced skills can only be revealed in the initial encounter with the novel task after training. The principle of mutualism suggests that growth in one cognitive skill may potentiate plasticity in related skills, such that transfer may only emerge with practice on the novel skill. We introduce a successive enrichment paradigm in which learning on a target skill (here, working memory (WM)) is examined as a function of earlier training experiences. Older adults were randomly assigned to one of four groups who trained on different combinations of tasks before training on a verbal WM task. Practice with any combination of WM tasks accelerated learning of the target task relative to a verbal decision speed control. Furthermore, those who first practiced multiple WM span tasks that were different from the target task showed larger pre- to posttest gain on the target WM task relative to those with prior exposure to only one different WM task or even the exact same WM task as the target. However, these effects only emerged with practice on the novel task. These data provide support for the mutualism principle — a conceptualization of transfer that can explain the emergence of the positive manifold of cognitive abilities, and offers promise for new pathways to promote late-life cognitive health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Ecological cognitive assessment has incremental validity for predicting academic performance over and above single occasion cognitive assessments The threshold for teratogenic effects on child intelligence of prenatal exposure to phenylalanine g: Formative, reflective, or both? Inconsistent Flynn effect patterns may be due to a decreasing positive manifold: Cohort-based measurement-invariant IQ test score changes from 2005 to 2024 Sex differences of school grades in childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1