数学教师领导力的研究出版和设计趋势:系统回顾

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Science and Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1111/ssm.12661
Courtney K. Baker, Stefanie D. Livers, Margret A. Hjalmarson, Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides, Kristin E. Harbour, KimAnn Brown
{"title":"数学教师领导力的研究出版和设计趋势:系统回顾","authors":"Courtney K. Baker, Stefanie D. Livers, Margret A. Hjalmarson, Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides, Kristin E. Harbour, KimAnn Brown","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics teacher leadership is promising, yet complex work, and research interest in this form of leadership is on the rise. This systematic review takes stock of the current research landscape on mathematics teacher leadership, specifically mathematics specialists as teacher leaders (MSTLs), and approaches the questions: (1) What are the historical publication trends for MSTLs? and (2) What are the various methods, research questions, and framing used in research design for MSTLs? For this review, we use a subset of articles focused on in-service MSTLs that are part of a larger systematic review that includes constructs such as coaching, mathematics specialists (MS), and other forms of leading teachers. Findings provide evidence that research on MSTLs is certainly on the rise, with nearly 90% of the MSTL research originating in the last decade and published within mainly general education journals. Furthermore, the majority of MSTL studies were qualitative in nature, answered research questions centered on leader interactions with others and leader reactions to professional development programs, and used various theories and constructs to ground the work. Overall, this study extends what is known about the research surrounding MSTLs, illuminates the complexities of this work, and discusses future directions for the field.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research publication and design trends in mathematics-specific teacher leadership: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Courtney K. Baker, Stefanie D. Livers, Margret A. Hjalmarson, Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides, Kristin E. Harbour, KimAnn Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ssm.12661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mathematics teacher leadership is promising, yet complex work, and research interest in this form of leadership is on the rise. This systematic review takes stock of the current research landscape on mathematics teacher leadership, specifically mathematics specialists as teacher leaders (MSTLs), and approaches the questions: (1) What are the historical publication trends for MSTLs? and (2) What are the various methods, research questions, and framing used in research design for MSTLs? For this review, we use a subset of articles focused on in-service MSTLs that are part of a larger systematic review that includes constructs such as coaching, mathematics specialists (MS), and other forms of leading teachers. Findings provide evidence that research on MSTLs is certainly on the rise, with nearly 90% of the MSTL research originating in the last decade and published within mainly general education journals. Furthermore, the majority of MSTL studies were qualitative in nature, answered research questions centered on leader interactions with others and leader reactions to professional development programs, and used various theories and constructs to ground the work. Overall, this study extends what is known about the research surrounding MSTLs, illuminates the complexities of this work, and discusses future directions for the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Science and Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Science and Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学教师领导力是一项前景广阔而又复杂的工作,对这种领导力形式的研究兴趣也在不断上升。本系统性综述对数学教师领导力,特别是作为教师领导者的数学专家(MSTLs)的研究现状进行了总结,并探讨了以下问题:(1)MSTLs 的历史出版趋势如何? (2) MSTLs 的研究设计采用了哪些不同的方法、研究问题和框架?在本综述中,我们使用了一部分关注在职 MSTL 的文章,这些文章是更大范围系统性综述的一部分,其中包括辅导、数学专家(MS)和其他形式的领导教师等建构。研究结果表明,对数学辅导教师的研究确实在不断增加,近 90% 的数学辅导教师研究是在过去十年间进行的,主要发表在普通教育期刊上。此外,大多数 MSTL 研究都是定性研究,回答的研究问题主要集中在领导者与他人的互动以及领导者对专业发展项目的反应上,并使用了各种理论和构造作为工作的基础。总之,本研究扩展了有关MSTL的已知研究,揭示了这项工作的复杂性,并讨论了该领域未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research publication and design trends in mathematics-specific teacher leadership: A systematic review
Mathematics teacher leadership is promising, yet complex work, and research interest in this form of leadership is on the rise. This systematic review takes stock of the current research landscape on mathematics teacher leadership, specifically mathematics specialists as teacher leaders (MSTLs), and approaches the questions: (1) What are the historical publication trends for MSTLs? and (2) What are the various methods, research questions, and framing used in research design for MSTLs? For this review, we use a subset of articles focused on in-service MSTLs that are part of a larger systematic review that includes constructs such as coaching, mathematics specialists (MS), and other forms of leading teachers. Findings provide evidence that research on MSTLs is certainly on the rise, with nearly 90% of the MSTL research originating in the last decade and published within mainly general education journals. Furthermore, the majority of MSTL studies were qualitative in nature, answered research questions centered on leader interactions with others and leader reactions to professional development programs, and used various theories and constructs to ground the work. Overall, this study extends what is known about the research surrounding MSTLs, illuminates the complexities of this work, and discusses future directions for the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Impacting elementary STEM teacher leadership identities Fostering students' inquiry aptitudes and collaborative reasoning in higher education science courses with social annotation tools and collaborative platforms Re‐imagining professional learning communities in education: Placing teacher leadership in STEM context Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice What does a scientist look like? Children's perceptions of scientist gender and skin tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1