Validation of Diagnostic Codes to Identify Glaucoma in Taiwan’s Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study

Background: Healthcare databases play a crucial role in improving our understanding of glaucoma epidemiology, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. However, the accuracy of diagnostic codes used in these databases to detect glaucoma is still uncertain.
Aim: To assess the accuracy of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes in identifying patients with glaucoma, including two distinct subtypes, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).
Methods: We analyzed electronic medical records data from a 2% random sample of patients who newly underwent visual field examination in Taiwan’s largest multi-institutional healthcare system from 2011 to 2020. The diagnosis of glaucoma was confirmed by two ophthalmologists, based on the glaucoma diagnostic criteria. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity for ICD-9-CM codes 365.1X and 365.2X, and ICD-10-CM codes H4010X, H4011X, H4012X, H4020X, H4021X, H4022X, H4023X and H4024X for glaucoma were calculated.
Results: We randomly selected 821 patients (mean age: 56.9 years old; female: 50.5%) from the original cohort of 41,050 newly receiving visual field examination in the study. Among 464 cases with an ICD-9-CM glaucoma code, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for glaucoma were 86.5, 96.5, 91.9, and 90.9%, respectively. Among 357 cases with an ICD-10-CM glaucoma code, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for glaucoma were 87.0, 92.8, 92.2 and 87.9%, respectively. The accuracy of diagnostic codes to identify POAG and PACG remained consistent.
Conclusion: The diagnostic codes were highly reliable for identifying cases of glaucoma in Taiwan’s routine healthcare practice. These results provide confidence when using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes to define glaucoma cases in healthcare database research in Taiwan.