数学教育研究人员在跨学科合作中的实践:拥抱不同的认知方式

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Mathematics Education Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1007/s13394-024-00489-x
Elizabeth Suazo-Flores, William S. Walker, Signe E. Kastberg, Mahtob Aqazade, Hanan Alyami
{"title":"数学教育研究人员在跨学科合作中的实践:拥抱不同的认知方式","authors":"Elizabeth Suazo-Flores, William S. Walker, Signe E. Kastberg, Mahtob Aqazade, Hanan Alyami","doi":"10.1007/s13394-024-00489-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mathematics education researchers (MERs) use practices unique to the mathematics education discipline to conduct their work. MERs’ practices, i.e., ways of being, interacting, and operating, define the field of mathematics education, are initially learned in doctoral preparation programs, and are encouraged and sanctioned by conferences and publications. Disciplinary practices facilitate MERs’ interactions within mathematics education. When working in interdisciplinary groups, differences in disciplinary ways of being, interacting, and operating can create challenges with completing research and other work. Since MERs’ engagement in interdisciplinary collaborations is encouraged and can result in products contributing to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline, it is important to explore what practices MERs use in interdisciplinary collaborations. We interviewed four MERs who led international interdisciplinary collaborations and used qualitative content analysis to create descriptions of practices described by MERs in their collaborations. Five practices were common between the MERs in interdisciplinary collaborations. MERs conducted interdisciplinary work by using practices that allowed them to situate themselves and others in the group (i.e., being practices), develop ideas (i.e., interacting practices), work towards common goals, and use structures to get the work done (i.e., operating practices). We argue that MERs developed new practices to position themselves and others, interact with practitioners from other disciplines, and get interdisciplinary work done. This study contributes to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline by offering five practices that can orient MERs to conducting interdisciplinary work and discussing how MERs experience interdisciplinary collaborations beyond providing mathematics education expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":46887,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics Education Research Journal","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematics education researchers’ practices in interdisciplinary collaborations: Embracing different ways of knowing\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Suazo-Flores, William S. Walker, Signe E. Kastberg, Mahtob Aqazade, Hanan Alyami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13394-024-00489-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mathematics education researchers (MERs) use practices unique to the mathematics education discipline to conduct their work. MERs’ practices, i.e., ways of being, interacting, and operating, define the field of mathematics education, are initially learned in doctoral preparation programs, and are encouraged and sanctioned by conferences and publications. Disciplinary practices facilitate MERs’ interactions within mathematics education. When working in interdisciplinary groups, differences in disciplinary ways of being, interacting, and operating can create challenges with completing research and other work. Since MERs’ engagement in interdisciplinary collaborations is encouraged and can result in products contributing to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline, it is important to explore what practices MERs use in interdisciplinary collaborations. We interviewed four MERs who led international interdisciplinary collaborations and used qualitative content analysis to create descriptions of practices described by MERs in their collaborations. Five practices were common between the MERs in interdisciplinary collaborations. MERs conducted interdisciplinary work by using practices that allowed them to situate themselves and others in the group (i.e., being practices), develop ideas (i.e., interacting practices), work towards common goals, and use structures to get the work done (i.e., operating practices). We argue that MERs developed new practices to position themselves and others, interact with practitioners from other disciplines, and get interdisciplinary work done. This study contributes to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline by offering five practices that can orient MERs to conducting interdisciplinary work and discussing how MERs experience interdisciplinary collaborations beyond providing mathematics education expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematics Education Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematics Education Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00489-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00489-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学教育研究人员(MERs)采用数学教育学科特有的实践方式开展工作。数学教育研究人员的实践,即存在、互动和运作的方式,界定了数学教育领域,最初是在博士预备课程中学到的,并受到会议和出版物的鼓励和认可。学科实践促进了数学教育专家在数学教育领域的互动。在跨学科小组中工作时,学科存在、互动和运作方式的差异会给完成研究和其他工作带来挑战。由于数学教育研究人员参与跨学科合作是受到鼓励的,而且可以产生有助于数学教育学科发展的产品,因此,探讨数学教育研究人员在跨学科合作中使用哪些实践方法是非常重要的。我们采访了四位领导国际跨学科合作的数学教育研究者,并使用定性内容分析法对他们在合作中的做法进行了描述。在跨学科合作中,市校之间有五种共同的做法。跨学科研究人员在开展跨学科工作时采用的做法使他们能够确定自己和他人在小组中的位置(即 "存在做法")、提出想法(即 "互动做法")、努力实现共同目标,以及利用结构完成工作(即 "运作做法")。我们认为,MERs 发展了新的实践来定位自己和他人,与其他学科的实践者互动,并完成跨学科工作。本研究提供了五种实践方法,可以引导数学教育工作者开展跨学科工作,并讨论了数学教育工作者如何在提供数学教育专业知识之外体验跨学科合作,从而为数学教育学科的发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mathematics education researchers’ practices in interdisciplinary collaborations: Embracing different ways of knowing

Mathematics education researchers (MERs) use practices unique to the mathematics education discipline to conduct their work. MERs’ practices, i.e., ways of being, interacting, and operating, define the field of mathematics education, are initially learned in doctoral preparation programs, and are encouraged and sanctioned by conferences and publications. Disciplinary practices facilitate MERs’ interactions within mathematics education. When working in interdisciplinary groups, differences in disciplinary ways of being, interacting, and operating can create challenges with completing research and other work. Since MERs’ engagement in interdisciplinary collaborations is encouraged and can result in products contributing to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline, it is important to explore what practices MERs use in interdisciplinary collaborations. We interviewed four MERs who led international interdisciplinary collaborations and used qualitative content analysis to create descriptions of practices described by MERs in their collaborations. Five practices were common between the MERs in interdisciplinary collaborations. MERs conducted interdisciplinary work by using practices that allowed them to situate themselves and others in the group (i.e., being practices), develop ideas (i.e., interacting practices), work towards common goals, and use structures to get the work done (i.e., operating practices). We argue that MERs developed new practices to position themselves and others, interact with practitioners from other disciplines, and get interdisciplinary work done. This study contributes to the evolution of the mathematics education discipline by offering five practices that can orient MERs to conducting interdisciplinary work and discussing how MERs experience interdisciplinary collaborations beyond providing mathematics education expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Mathematics Education Research Journal EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Mathematics Education Research Journal seeks to promote high quality research that is of interest to the international community.   The Mathematics Education Research Journal seeks to present research that promotes new knowledge, ideas, methodologies and epistemologies in the field of mathematics education.    The Mathematics Education Research Journal actively seeks to promote research from the Australasian region either as research conducted in the region; conducted by researchers from the region and/or draws on research from the region.  The Mathematics Education Research Journal accepts papers from authors from all regions internationally but authors must draw on the extensive research that has been produced in the Australasian region.   The Mathematics Education Research Journal normally does not encourage publication of teacher education programs or courses. These are more suited for theother MERGA journal, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development.
期刊最新文献
Teacher–child interactions during shared book reading in the domain of early mathematics Defining and measuring quality in students’ mathematical writing: a systematic literature review Pre-service mathematics teachers’ personal meanings proclaiming about the characteristics of realistic mathematics problems Errors and misconceptions of secondary school students in absolute values: a systematic literature review A proposal for the study of mathematics teachers’ beliefs through the analysis of their practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1