美国新泽西州拉里坦河中美国鲱鱼和河鲱的洄游通道和数量

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Transactions of The American Fisheries Society Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1002/tafs.10467
Olaf P. Jensen, Anthony R. Vastano, Michael C. Allen, Mario F. Hernandez, Julie L. Lockwood, James M. Vasslides, Orion Weldon
{"title":"美国新泽西州拉里坦河中美国鲱鱼和河鲱的洄游通道和数量","authors":"Olaf P. Jensen, Anthony R. Vastano, Michael C. Allen, Mario F. Hernandez, Julie L. Lockwood, James M. Vasslides, Orion Weldon","doi":"10.1002/tafs.10467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveRestoration of many populations of anadromous American Shad <jats:italic>Alosa sapidissima</jats:italic> and river herring (Alewife <jats:italic>A. pseudoharengus</jats:italic> and Blueback Herring <jats:italic>A. aestivalis</jats:italic>) has been hampered by the presence of barriers to their spawning migrations and insufficient monitoring of run size. Here, we describe results of a 10‐year (2012–2021) study of American Shad and river herring passage at the Island Farm Weir (IFW), the downstream‐most migration barrier on the Raritan River, New Jersey, United States.MethodsWe used passive integrated transponder tags applied to fish that were captured and released downstream of the IFW to estimate passage rates and migration delays associated with upstream movements through an antenna array on a vertical slot fishway within the weir. By combining estimated passage rates with video monitoring of the total numbers of American Shad and river herring transiting the fishway, we estimated the annual run size below the weir.ResultResults suggest that the fishway on the IFW is moderately effective for American Shad (passage rate = 41%; 95% credible interval [CI] = 21–61%) but ineffective for the smaller‐bodied river herring (passage rate = 0.5%, 95% CI = 0–2%; fallback‐adjusted passage rate = 1.1%, 95% CI = 0.0–4.5%). The IFW may have also delayed the spawning migrations of those fish that did pass, with total passage times ranging from 0.4 to 20.9 days (mean ± standard deviation = 8.2 ± 5.3 days) for American Shad and 15.0 days for the one river herring that passed within the same year that it was tagged. Run size estimates during the study period ranged from 103 to 2624 individuals for American Shad and from 1486 to 53,334 for river herring.ConclusionRestoration of these species in the Raritan River will likely require removal of the IFW or replacement of its current fish passage device with one that increases the passage rates of alosines.","PeriodicalId":23214,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migratory passage and run size of American Shad and river herring in the Raritan River, New Jersey, USA\",\"authors\":\"Olaf P. Jensen, Anthony R. Vastano, Michael C. Allen, Mario F. Hernandez, Julie L. Lockwood, James M. Vasslides, Orion Weldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tafs.10467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveRestoration of many populations of anadromous American Shad <jats:italic>Alosa sapidissima</jats:italic> and river herring (Alewife <jats:italic>A. pseudoharengus</jats:italic> and Blueback Herring <jats:italic>A. aestivalis</jats:italic>) has been hampered by the presence of barriers to their spawning migrations and insufficient monitoring of run size. Here, we describe results of a 10‐year (2012–2021) study of American Shad and river herring passage at the Island Farm Weir (IFW), the downstream‐most migration barrier on the Raritan River, New Jersey, United States.MethodsWe used passive integrated transponder tags applied to fish that were captured and released downstream of the IFW to estimate passage rates and migration delays associated with upstream movements through an antenna array on a vertical slot fishway within the weir. By combining estimated passage rates with video monitoring of the total numbers of American Shad and river herring transiting the fishway, we estimated the annual run size below the weir.ResultResults suggest that the fishway on the IFW is moderately effective for American Shad (passage rate = 41%; 95% credible interval [CI] = 21–61%) but ineffective for the smaller‐bodied river herring (passage rate = 0.5%, 95% CI = 0–2%; fallback‐adjusted passage rate = 1.1%, 95% CI = 0.0–4.5%). The IFW may have also delayed the spawning migrations of those fish that did pass, with total passage times ranging from 0.4 to 20.9 days (mean ± standard deviation = 8.2 ± 5.3 days) for American Shad and 15.0 days for the one river herring that passed within the same year that it was tagged. Run size estimates during the study period ranged from 103 to 2624 individuals for American Shad and from 1486 to 53,334 for river herring.ConclusionRestoration of these species in the Raritan River will likely require removal of the IFW or replacement of its current fish passage device with one that increases the passage rates of alosines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标由于产卵洄游障碍的存在以及对鱼群规模的监测不足,许多溯河而上的美洲鲱(Alosa sapidissima)和河鲱(Alewife A. pseudoharengus 和 Blueback Herring A. aestivalis)种群的恢复受到了阻碍。在此,我们将介绍一项为期 10 年(2012-2021 年)的美国鲥鱼和河鲱鱼在美国新泽西州拉里坦河最下游洄游障碍--岛屿农场堰(IFW)的通过情况研究结果。方法我们在 IFW 下游捕获并释放的鱼类身上使用被动式集成转发器标签,通过堰内垂直缝隙鱼道上的天线阵列估算通过率以及与上游运动相关的洄游延迟。结果结果表明,IFW 上的鱼道对美洲鲥鱼的效果一般(通过率 = 41%;95% 可信区间 [CI] = 21-61%),但对体型较小的鲱鱼效果不佳(通过率 = 0.5%,95% CI = 0-2%;回落调整通过率 = 1.1%,95% CI = 0.0-4.5%)。IFW 还可能延迟了那些通过的鱼类的产卵洄游,美洲鲱鱼的总通过时间从 0.4 天到 20.9 天不等(平均值 ± 标准差 = 8.2 ± 5.3 天),一条在被标记的同一年通过的河鲱鱼的通过时间为 15.0 天。在研究期间,估计美洲鲥鱼的数量从 103 条到 2624 条不等,河鲱鱼的数量从 1486 条到 53,334 条不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Migratory passage and run size of American Shad and river herring in the Raritan River, New Jersey, USA
ObjectiveRestoration of many populations of anadromous American Shad Alosa sapidissima and river herring (Alewife A. pseudoharengus and Blueback Herring A. aestivalis) has been hampered by the presence of barriers to their spawning migrations and insufficient monitoring of run size. Here, we describe results of a 10‐year (2012–2021) study of American Shad and river herring passage at the Island Farm Weir (IFW), the downstream‐most migration barrier on the Raritan River, New Jersey, United States.MethodsWe used passive integrated transponder tags applied to fish that were captured and released downstream of the IFW to estimate passage rates and migration delays associated with upstream movements through an antenna array on a vertical slot fishway within the weir. By combining estimated passage rates with video monitoring of the total numbers of American Shad and river herring transiting the fishway, we estimated the annual run size below the weir.ResultResults suggest that the fishway on the IFW is moderately effective for American Shad (passage rate = 41%; 95% credible interval [CI] = 21–61%) but ineffective for the smaller‐bodied river herring (passage rate = 0.5%, 95% CI = 0–2%; fallback‐adjusted passage rate = 1.1%, 95% CI = 0.0–4.5%). The IFW may have also delayed the spawning migrations of those fish that did pass, with total passage times ranging from 0.4 to 20.9 days (mean ± standard deviation = 8.2 ± 5.3 days) for American Shad and 15.0 days for the one river herring that passed within the same year that it was tagged. Run size estimates during the study period ranged from 103 to 2624 individuals for American Shad and from 1486 to 53,334 for river herring.ConclusionRestoration of these species in the Raritan River will likely require removal of the IFW or replacement of its current fish passage device with one that increases the passage rates of alosines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society is a highly regarded international journal of fisheries science that has been published continuously since 1872. It features results of basic and applied research in genetics, physiology, biology, ecology, population dynamics, economics, health, culture, and other topics germane to marine and freshwater finfish and shellfish and their respective fisheries and environments.
期刊最新文献
Climate winners: Adapting to shifting species in the New England supply chain Acoustic telemetry yields stock membership clues for Coho Salmon harvested in coastal fisheries Advances in the Ecology of Stream‐Dwelling Salmonids. Edited by JavierLobon‐Cervia, PhaedraBudy, and RobertGresswell. Springer, Fish and Fisheries Series volume 44. 2024. 740 pages. $219.00 (e‐book), $279.99 (hardcover). Seasonal movements between main stem and tributaries may facilitate the persistence of Roundtail Chub and Flannelmouth Sucker within an altered stream system Spatial and temporal variability of movements among sympatric salmonids in an unfragmented inland watershed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1