人口可归属比例的计算错误。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1097/ede.0000000000001731
Etsuji Suzuki, Eiji Yamamoto
{"title":"人口可归属比例的计算错误。","authors":"Etsuji Suzuki, Eiji Yamamoto","doi":"10.1097/ede.0000000000001731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the common errors in the calculation of the population attributable fraction (PAF) is the use of an adjusted risk ratio in the Levin formula. In this article, we discuss the errors visually using wireframes by varying the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and associational risk ratio (aRR) when the prevalence of exposure is fixed. When SMR > 1 and SMR > aRR, the absolute bias is positive, and its magnitude increases as the difference between SMR and aRR increases. By contrast, when aRR > SMR > 1, the absolute bias is negative and its magnitude is relatively small. Moreover, when SMR > aRR, the relative bias is larger than 1, whereas when SMR < aRR, the relative bias is smaller than 1. Although the target population of the PAF is the total population, the target of causation of the PAF is not the total population but the exposed group.","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Errors in the Calculation of the Population Attributable Fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Etsuji Suzuki, Eiji Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ede.0000000000001731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the common errors in the calculation of the population attributable fraction (PAF) is the use of an adjusted risk ratio in the Levin formula. In this article, we discuss the errors visually using wireframes by varying the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and associational risk ratio (aRR) when the prevalence of exposure is fixed. When SMR > 1 and SMR > aRR, the absolute bias is positive, and its magnitude increases as the difference between SMR and aRR increases. By contrast, when aRR > SMR > 1, the absolute bias is negative and its magnitude is relatively small. Moreover, when SMR > aRR, the relative bias is larger than 1, whereas when SMR < aRR, the relative bias is smaller than 1. Although the target population of the PAF is the total population, the target of causation of the PAF is not the total population but the exposed group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001731\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算人口可归因分数 (PAF) 的常见错误之一是在 Levin 公式中使用了调整风险比。在本文中,我们通过线框直观地讨论了在暴露流行率固定的情况下,通过改变标准化死亡率(SMR)和关联风险比(aRR)所产生的误差。当 SMR > 1 和 SMR > aRR 时,绝对偏差为正,且其幅度随着 SMR 和 aRR 差值的增大而增大。相比之下,当 aRR > SMR > 1 时,绝对偏差为负,且幅度相对较小。此外,当 SMR > aRR 时,相对偏差大于 1,而当 SMR < aRR 时,相对偏差小于 1。虽然 PAF 的目标人群是总人口,但 PAF 的因果关系目标不是总人口,而是暴露群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Errors in the Calculation of the Population Attributable Fraction.
One of the common errors in the calculation of the population attributable fraction (PAF) is the use of an adjusted risk ratio in the Levin formula. In this article, we discuss the errors visually using wireframes by varying the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and associational risk ratio (aRR) when the prevalence of exposure is fixed. When SMR > 1 and SMR > aRR, the absolute bias is positive, and its magnitude increases as the difference between SMR and aRR increases. By contrast, when aRR > SMR > 1, the absolute bias is negative and its magnitude is relatively small. Moreover, when SMR > aRR, the relative bias is larger than 1, whereas when SMR < aRR, the relative bias is smaller than 1. Although the target population of the PAF is the total population, the target of causation of the PAF is not the total population but the exposed group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Adjusting adjustments: Using external data to estimate the impact of different confounder sets on published associations. Low-level PM2.5 exposure, Cardiovascular and Non-accidental Mortality, and Related Health Disparities in 12 U.S. States. A structural description of biases that generate immortal time. Associations Between Gestational Residential Radon Exposure and Term Low Birthweight in Connecticut, USA. Prenatal Exposure to Nonpersistent Chemicals and Fetal-to-childhood Growth Trajectories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1