SNAP 参与者和非参与者的家庭粮食安全对策

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1002/aepp.13435
Parke E. Wilde, Irma Arteaga
{"title":"SNAP 参与者和非参与者的家庭粮食安全对策","authors":"Parke E. Wilde,&nbsp;Irma Arteaga","doi":"10.1002/aepp.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"46 4","pages":"1338-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.13435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household food security responses for SNAP participants and nonparticipants\",\"authors\":\"Parke E. Wilde,&nbsp;Irma Arteaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"1338-1354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aepp.13435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与情况与不同的食品相关困难经历之间的不同关联。我们利用美国农业部经济研究局 2022 年的 10 个成人食品安全调查项目数据,对 Rasch 模型进行了推广,发现了统一的差异项目功能的证据。在第一项(与食物有关的担忧)和第三项(获得均衡膳食的困难)之间,SNAP 家庭的回答几率差距大于非 SNAP 家庭。其他调查项目也存在类似的差异。我们考虑了 SNAP 政策或计划的变化是否会对与食物有关的特定困难产生不同的有利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Household food security responses for SNAP participants and nonparticipants

We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy provides a forum to address contemporary and emerging policy issues within an economic framework that informs the decision-making and policy-making community. AEPP welcomes submissions related to the economics of public policy themes associated with agriculture; animal, plant, and human health; energy; environment; food and consumer behavior; international development; natural hazards; natural resources; population and migration; and regional and rural development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information EU food price inflation amid global market turbulences during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine War Geostrategic dimensions of recent food policy decisions The impact of agricultural policy evolution on long-run grain market projection The interplay of geopolitics and agricultural commodity prices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1