身体运动动力学中的个性表达:主动、体现和复杂系统的视角

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104495
Nicol A. Arellano-Véliz , Ralf F.A. Cox , Bertus F. Jeronimus , Ramón D. Castillo , E. Saskia Kunnen
{"title":"身体运动动力学中的个性表达:主动、体现和复杂系统的视角","authors":"Nicol A. Arellano-Véliz ,&nbsp;Ralf F.A. Cox ,&nbsp;Bertus F. Jeronimus ,&nbsp;Ramón D. Castillo ,&nbsp;E. Saskia Kunnen","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We studied body motion dynamics and personality differences using complex systems methods. 105 adults (aged 18–33, 70% women) completed a 15-minute laboratory task covering three self-referencing topics (self-introduction, bodily perception/sensory life, socio-emotional life). Body motion dynamics were extracted from videos using a frame-by-frame differentiation method. Recurrence Quantification Analysis derived the measures of Determinism, Entropy, Laminarity, and Mean-Line. Multilevel models estimated personality (IPIP-NEO-120) and situational effects. Neuroticism predicted lower determinism and fluctuating dynamics in bodily perception and socioemotional life; less complexity and stability during socioemotional topics, and increased negative affect. Extraversion predicted regular/deterministic dynamics during bodily perception. Conscientiousness predicted lower determinism and increased variability. Agreeableness predicted lower post-task negative affect. Findings are discussed within embodied, enactive, complex systems, and personality frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 104495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000436/pdfft?md5=a033a8c652fbcff52e4e53206537319c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000436-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality expression in body motion dynamics: An enactive, embodied, and complex systems perspective\",\"authors\":\"Nicol A. Arellano-Véliz ,&nbsp;Ralf F.A. Cox ,&nbsp;Bertus F. Jeronimus ,&nbsp;Ramón D. Castillo ,&nbsp;E. Saskia Kunnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We studied body motion dynamics and personality differences using complex systems methods. 105 adults (aged 18–33, 70% women) completed a 15-minute laboratory task covering three self-referencing topics (self-introduction, bodily perception/sensory life, socio-emotional life). Body motion dynamics were extracted from videos using a frame-by-frame differentiation method. Recurrence Quantification Analysis derived the measures of Determinism, Entropy, Laminarity, and Mean-Line. Multilevel models estimated personality (IPIP-NEO-120) and situational effects. Neuroticism predicted lower determinism and fluctuating dynamics in bodily perception and socioemotional life; less complexity and stability during socioemotional topics, and increased negative affect. Extraversion predicted regular/deterministic dynamics during bodily perception. Conscientiousness predicted lower determinism and increased variability. Agreeableness predicted lower post-task negative affect. Findings are discussed within embodied, enactive, complex systems, and personality frameworks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000436/pdfft?md5=a033a8c652fbcff52e4e53206537319c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000436-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采用复杂系统方法研究了身体运动动力学和人格差异。105 名成年人(18-33 岁,70% 为女性)完成了一项 15 分钟的实验室任务,该任务涵盖三个自我参照主题(自我介绍、身体感知/感官生活、社会情感生活)。使用逐帧区分法从视频中提取身体运动动态。递归量化分析法得出了确定性、熵、层状性和平均线等指标。多层次模型估计了人格(IPIP-NEO-120)和情境效应。神经质预示着身体感知和社会情感生活中较低的决定性和波动性;社会情感主题中较低的复杂性和稳定性,以及较高的负面情绪。外向性预示着身体感知的规律性/决定性动态。自觉性预示着较低的决定性和较高的可变性。宜人性预示着较低的任务后负面情绪。研究结果将在具身、能动、复杂系统和人格框架内进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personality expression in body motion dynamics: An enactive, embodied, and complex systems perspective

We studied body motion dynamics and personality differences using complex systems methods. 105 adults (aged 18–33, 70% women) completed a 15-minute laboratory task covering three self-referencing topics (self-introduction, bodily perception/sensory life, socio-emotional life). Body motion dynamics were extracted from videos using a frame-by-frame differentiation method. Recurrence Quantification Analysis derived the measures of Determinism, Entropy, Laminarity, and Mean-Line. Multilevel models estimated personality (IPIP-NEO-120) and situational effects. Neuroticism predicted lower determinism and fluctuating dynamics in bodily perception and socioemotional life; less complexity and stability during socioemotional topics, and increased negative affect. Extraversion predicted regular/deterministic dynamics during bodily perception. Conscientiousness predicted lower determinism and increased variability. Agreeableness predicted lower post-task negative affect. Findings are discussed within embodied, enactive, complex systems, and personality frameworks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Why does Creativity Foster Well-Being? Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness during Everyday Creative Activities Comparability of personality facets between men and women: A test of measurement invariance in IPIP-NEO facets in 49 countries The dynamic relationship between state extraversion and the subjectively perceived situational sociality in continuous time “High empathic response but low interest”: Machiavellianism and its neurostructural basis relate to perceived risk of social exclusion and workplace deviance Incremental relations between self-understanding and social functioning beyond personality traits in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1