基于资产的不确定性是否会导致各地区环境、社会和治理市场的非对称回报关联性?

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100972
Purba Bhattacherjee , Sibanjan Mishra , Elie Bouri
{"title":"基于资产的不确定性是否会导致各地区环境、社会和治理市场的非对称回报关联性?","authors":"Purba Bhattacherjee ,&nbsp;Sibanjan Mishra ,&nbsp;Elie Bouri","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the impact of asset-based uncertainty on the asymmetric return connectedness and hedging effectiveness of regional environmental, social and governance (ESG) equity markets from January 2017 to December 2022. The results of the asymmetric time-varying parameter vector autoregressive connectedness approach show strong dynamic connectedness within regional ESG markets, with the dominance of negative returns intensifying during COVID-19. Quantile regressions reveal that uncertainty in crude oil and bond markets negatively affects asymmetric return connectedness across bearish, normal and bullish market periods, whereas uncertainty in stock, gold and exchange rate markets has a positive impact. Overall, asset-based uncertainty influences negative return connectedness more than positive return connectedness, and a varied influence of asset-based uncertainty is noted during COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine war. A portfolio analysis shows that all ESG markets significantly contribute to higher hedging effectiveness, with a portfolio constructed based on the minimum connectedness approach outperforming the other portfolios. The findings provide policy implications for portfolio and risk management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 100972"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does asset-based uncertainty drive asymmetric return connectedness across regional ESG markets?\",\"authors\":\"Purba Bhattacherjee ,&nbsp;Sibanjan Mishra ,&nbsp;Elie Bouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the impact of asset-based uncertainty on the asymmetric return connectedness and hedging effectiveness of regional environmental, social and governance (ESG) equity markets from January 2017 to December 2022. The results of the asymmetric time-varying parameter vector autoregressive connectedness approach show strong dynamic connectedness within regional ESG markets, with the dominance of negative returns intensifying during COVID-19. Quantile regressions reveal that uncertainty in crude oil and bond markets negatively affects asymmetric return connectedness across bearish, normal and bullish market periods, whereas uncertainty in stock, gold and exchange rate markets has a positive impact. Overall, asset-based uncertainty influences negative return connectedness more than positive return connectedness, and a varied influence of asset-based uncertainty is noted during COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine war. A portfolio analysis shows that all ESG markets significantly contribute to higher hedging effectiveness, with a portfolio constructed based on the minimum connectedness approach outperforming the other portfolios. The findings provide policy implications for portfolio and risk management strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000449\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了2017年1月至2022年12月期间基于资产的不确定性对区域环境、社会和治理(ESG)股票市场的非对称收益关联性和对冲有效性的影响。非对称时变参数向量自回归关联性方法的结果显示,区域ESG市场内部存在较强的动态关联性,负收益的主导地位在COVID-19期间加剧。量子回归显示,原油和债券市场的不确定性对熊市、正常市场和牛市期间的非对称回报关联性有负面影响,而股票、黄金和汇率市场的不确定性则有正面影响。总体而言,资产不确定性对负向回报关联性的影响大于正向回报关联性,在 COVID-19 和俄乌战争期间,资产不确定性的影响各不相同。投资组合分析显示,所有环境、社会和公司治理市场都能显著提高对冲有效性,而基于最小关联性方法构建的投资组合表现优于其他投资组合。研究结果为投资组合和风险管理战略提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does asset-based uncertainty drive asymmetric return connectedness across regional ESG markets?

This paper investigates the impact of asset-based uncertainty on the asymmetric return connectedness and hedging effectiveness of regional environmental, social and governance (ESG) equity markets from January 2017 to December 2022. The results of the asymmetric time-varying parameter vector autoregressive connectedness approach show strong dynamic connectedness within regional ESG markets, with the dominance of negative returns intensifying during COVID-19. Quantile regressions reveal that uncertainty in crude oil and bond markets negatively affects asymmetric return connectedness across bearish, normal and bullish market periods, whereas uncertainty in stock, gold and exchange rate markets has a positive impact. Overall, asset-based uncertainty influences negative return connectedness more than positive return connectedness, and a varied influence of asset-based uncertainty is noted during COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine war. A portfolio analysis shows that all ESG markets significantly contribute to higher hedging effectiveness, with a portfolio constructed based on the minimum connectedness approach outperforming the other portfolios. The findings provide policy implications for portfolio and risk management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Business group heterogeneity and firm outcomes: Evidence from Korean chaebols Under the microscope: Trade initiation activities around earnings and takeover announcements in a market with continuous disclosure Stock, foreign exchange and commodity markets linkages: Implications for risk diversification and portfolio management Value of climate change news: A textual analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1