使用深动脉穿孔器皮瓣进行乳房再造时,采用一条静脉吻合还是两条静脉吻合--是否有区别

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1002/micr.31179
Charalampos Varnava M.D, Maximilian Kueckelhaus M.D MBA, Sascha Wellenbrock M.D, Tobias Hirsch M.D, Philipp Wiebringhaus M.D., MHBA
{"title":"使用深动脉穿孔器皮瓣进行乳房再造时,采用一条静脉吻合还是两条静脉吻合--是否有区别","authors":"Charalampos Varnava M.D,&nbsp;Maximilian Kueckelhaus M.D MBA,&nbsp;Sascha Wellenbrock M.D,&nbsp;Tobias Hirsch M.D,&nbsp;Philipp Wiebringhaus M.D., MHBA","doi":"10.1002/micr.31179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has gained popularity as a reliable alternative in breast reconstruction. Extensive research has focused on its vascular supply, dissection techniques, and broader applications beyond breast reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the number of veins anastomosed for the PAP flap and postoperative complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of breast reconstructions with PAP flaps at our institution between 2018 and 2022. A total of 103 PAP flaps in 88 patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between flaps with one vein anastomosis and those with two vein anastomoses. Patient characteristics, intra and postoperative parameters were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One vein anastomosis was used in 36 flaps (35.0%), whereas two vein anastomoses were used in 67 flaps (65.0%). No significant differences were found in patient characteristics between the one vein and two vein groups. The comparison of ischemia times between flaps with one versus two veins revealed no statistically significant difference, with mean ischemia times of 56.2 ± 36.8 min and 58.7 ± 33.0 min, respectively. Regarding outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in secondary lipofilling, revision of vein anastomosis, or total flap loss between the two groups. Fat necrosis was observed in 5 (13.9%) one vein flaps and 5 (7.5%) two vein flaps, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>p =</i> .313). In the one vein group, the most frequently employed coupler ring had a diameter of 2.5 mm. In the two vein group, the most prevalent combination consisted of a 2.0 mm diameter with a 2.5 mm diameter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Based on our study results, both one vein anastomosis and two vein anastomoses are viable options for breast reconstruction with PAP flap. The utilization of either one or two veins did not significantly affect ischemia time or flap loss. Fat necrosis exhibited a higher incidence in the single-vein group; however, this difference was also not statistically significant. These findings underscore the effectiveness of both approaches, providing surgeons with flexibility in tailoring their surgical techniques based on patient-specific considerations and anatomical factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One versus two vein anastomoses in breast reconstruction with a profunda artery perforator flap—does it make a difference\",\"authors\":\"Charalampos Varnava M.D,&nbsp;Maximilian Kueckelhaus M.D MBA,&nbsp;Sascha Wellenbrock M.D,&nbsp;Tobias Hirsch M.D,&nbsp;Philipp Wiebringhaus M.D., MHBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.31179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has gained popularity as a reliable alternative in breast reconstruction. Extensive research has focused on its vascular supply, dissection techniques, and broader applications beyond breast reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the number of veins anastomosed for the PAP flap and postoperative complications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of breast reconstructions with PAP flaps at our institution between 2018 and 2022. A total of 103 PAP flaps in 88 patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between flaps with one vein anastomosis and those with two vein anastomoses. Patient characteristics, intra and postoperative parameters were analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>One vein anastomosis was used in 36 flaps (35.0%), whereas two vein anastomoses were used in 67 flaps (65.0%). No significant differences were found in patient characteristics between the one vein and two vein groups. The comparison of ischemia times between flaps with one versus two veins revealed no statistically significant difference, with mean ischemia times of 56.2 ± 36.8 min and 58.7 ± 33.0 min, respectively. Regarding outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in secondary lipofilling, revision of vein anastomosis, or total flap loss between the two groups. Fat necrosis was observed in 5 (13.9%) one vein flaps and 5 (7.5%) two vein flaps, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>p =</i> .313). In the one vein group, the most frequently employed coupler ring had a diameter of 2.5 mm. In the two vein group, the most prevalent combination consisted of a 2.0 mm diameter with a 2.5 mm diameter.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on our study results, both one vein anastomosis and two vein anastomoses are viable options for breast reconstruction with PAP flap. The utilization of either one or two veins did not significantly affect ischemia time or flap loss. Fat necrosis exhibited a higher incidence in the single-vein group; however, this difference was also not statistically significant. These findings underscore the effectiveness of both approaches, providing surgeons with flexibility in tailoring their surgical techniques based on patient-specific considerations and anatomical factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31179\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景深动脉穿孔器(PAP)瓣作为乳房重建中的一种可靠替代方法,已受到广泛欢迎。大量研究集中于其血管供应、解剖技术以及乳房重建以外的更广泛应用。本研究旨在探讨 PAP 皮瓣吻合的静脉数量与术后并发症之间的相关性。 方法 对我院 2018 年至 2022 年期间使用 PAP 皮瓣进行乳房重建的结果进行回顾性研究。共纳入了 88 名患者的 103 个 PAP 皮瓣。通过统计分析,比较了单静脉吻合皮瓣和双静脉吻合皮瓣的疗效。对患者特征、术中和术后参数进行了分析。 结果 36 个皮瓣(35.0%)采用了一条静脉吻合,而 67 个皮瓣(65.0%)采用了两条静脉吻合。单静脉组和双静脉组的患者特征无明显差异。单静脉与双静脉皮瓣缺血时间的比较结果显示,两者的差异无统计学意义,平均缺血时间分别为(56.2±36.8)分钟和(58.7±33.0)分钟。在结果方面,两组之间在二次脂肪填充、静脉吻合术翻修或皮瓣总损失方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在 5 个(13.9%)单静脉皮瓣和 5 个(7.5%)双静脉皮瓣中观察到脂肪坏死,这表明两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P = .313)。在单静脉组中,最常用的耦合环直径为 2.5 毫米。在双静脉组中,最常用的组合是直径 2.0 毫米和直径 2.5 毫米的组合。 结论 根据我们的研究结果,单静脉吻合和双静脉吻合都是使用 PAP 皮瓣进行乳房重建的可行方案。使用一根或两根静脉对缺血时间或皮瓣损失没有明显影响。单静脉组的脂肪坏死发生率较高,但这一差异也没有统计学意义。这些发现强调了两种方法的有效性,为外科医生提供了根据患者的具体情况和解剖因素灵活调整手术技术的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One versus two vein anastomoses in breast reconstruction with a profunda artery perforator flap—does it make a difference

Background

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has gained popularity as a reliable alternative in breast reconstruction. Extensive research has focused on its vascular supply, dissection techniques, and broader applications beyond breast reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the number of veins anastomosed for the PAP flap and postoperative complications.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of breast reconstructions with PAP flaps at our institution between 2018 and 2022. A total of 103 PAP flaps in 88 patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between flaps with one vein anastomosis and those with two vein anastomoses. Patient characteristics, intra and postoperative parameters were analysed.

Results

One vein anastomosis was used in 36 flaps (35.0%), whereas two vein anastomoses were used in 67 flaps (65.0%). No significant differences were found in patient characteristics between the one vein and two vein groups. The comparison of ischemia times between flaps with one versus two veins revealed no statistically significant difference, with mean ischemia times of 56.2 ± 36.8 min and 58.7 ± 33.0 min, respectively. Regarding outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in secondary lipofilling, revision of vein anastomosis, or total flap loss between the two groups. Fat necrosis was observed in 5 (13.9%) one vein flaps and 5 (7.5%) two vein flaps, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = .313). In the one vein group, the most frequently employed coupler ring had a diameter of 2.5 mm. In the two vein group, the most prevalent combination consisted of a 2.0 mm diameter with a 2.5 mm diameter.

Conclusion

Based on our study results, both one vein anastomosis and two vein anastomoses are viable options for breast reconstruction with PAP flap. The utilization of either one or two veins did not significantly affect ischemia time or flap loss. Fat necrosis exhibited a higher incidence in the single-vein group; however, this difference was also not statistically significant. These findings underscore the effectiveness of both approaches, providing surgeons with flexibility in tailoring their surgical techniques based on patient-specific considerations and anatomical factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Vascular Imaging in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction: Comparison Between Imaging Modalities Flap-Based Lower Extremity Reconstruction in the Elderly—Is It Safe and Does Age Impact Ambulation? Free Vascularized Scapula tip Flap to L5—S1 Vertebral Defect After Chronic Infection Related to Interbody Fusion Cage: A Case Report Issue Information Facial Artery Perforator Flap for Perioral and Perinasal Oncologic Defect Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1