Antonio Calvo-Cebrián, Rafael Alonso Roca, Ignacio Manuel Sánchez-Barrancos
{"title":"基层医疗机构腹部定点超声诊断准确性:研究设计与方案","authors":"Antonio Calvo-Cebrián, Rafael Alonso Roca, Ignacio Manuel Sánchez-Barrancos","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians (FPs) in primary care (PC), in comparison with the findings in the medical record (MR) at 12 months of follow-up. This study is conducted entirely in PC healthcare centers in Spain. Abdominal ultrasound scans performed by FPs (selected on the basis of their ultrasound knowledge and experience) are compared with the findings, or not, in the patient's MR after a 12-month follow-up period. The study will involve 100 FPs in Spain and an estimated sample size of 1334 patients who are to undergo abdominal POCUS at the indication of their physician. The results of the abdominal POCUS will be collected and compared with the findings of the MR. This comparison will be performed by another physician of the research team, different from their FP after one year of follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal POCUS has been addressed in the hospital setting but not in PC. This lack of evidence can begin to be resolved with studies such as the one we present, designed for unselected populations such as those treated in PC and taking the patient's MR as the gold standard, which will allow us to make comparisons with the patient's clinical course.","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"35 22","pages":"63 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Point of Care Ultrasound in Primary Care: Study Design and Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Calvo-Cebrián, Rafael Alonso Roca, Ignacio Manuel Sánchez-Barrancos\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians (FPs) in primary care (PC), in comparison with the findings in the medical record (MR) at 12 months of follow-up. This study is conducted entirely in PC healthcare centers in Spain. Abdominal ultrasound scans performed by FPs (selected on the basis of their ultrasound knowledge and experience) are compared with the findings, or not, in the patient's MR after a 12-month follow-up period. The study will involve 100 FPs in Spain and an estimated sample size of 1334 patients who are to undergo abdominal POCUS at the indication of their physician. The results of the abdominal POCUS will be collected and compared with the findings of the MR. This comparison will be performed by another physician of the research team, different from their FP after one year of follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal POCUS has been addressed in the hospital setting but not in PC. This lack of evidence can begin to be resolved with studies such as the one we present, designed for unselected populations such as those treated in PC and taking the patient's MR as the gold standard, which will allow us to make comparisons with the patient's clinical course.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POCUS journal\",\"volume\":\"35 22\",\"pages\":\"63 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POCUS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 本研究旨在估算初级保健(PC)中由家庭医生(FPs)进行的腹部护理点超声检查(POCUS)的诊断准确性,并与随访 12 个月后的病历(MR)结果进行比较。这项研究完全在西班牙的 PC 医疗中心进行。在 12 个月的随访期后,将全科医生(根据其超声波知识和经验进行筛选)进行的腹部超声波扫描结果与患者病历中的检查结果进行比较。这项研究将涉及西班牙的 100 名 FP 和 1334 名估计样本量的患者,这些患者将在医生的指示下接受腹部 POCUS 检查。将收集腹部 POCUS 的结果,并与 MR 的结果进行比较。这种比较将由研究小组的另一名医生在一年随访后进行,该医生不同于他们的 FP。腹部 POCUS 的诊断准确性已在医院环境中进行过研究,但在 PC 中尚未进行过研究。这种证据不足的问题可以通过像我们介绍的这种研究开始得到解决,这种研究针对的是未经选择的人群,如在 PC 中接受治疗的人群,并将患者的 MR 作为金标准,这将使我们能够与患者的临床病程进行比较。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Point of Care Ultrasound in Primary Care: Study Design and Protocol
Abstract The aim of this study is to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by family physicians (FPs) in primary care (PC), in comparison with the findings in the medical record (MR) at 12 months of follow-up. This study is conducted entirely in PC healthcare centers in Spain. Abdominal ultrasound scans performed by FPs (selected on the basis of their ultrasound knowledge and experience) are compared with the findings, or not, in the patient's MR after a 12-month follow-up period. The study will involve 100 FPs in Spain and an estimated sample size of 1334 patients who are to undergo abdominal POCUS at the indication of their physician. The results of the abdominal POCUS will be collected and compared with the findings of the MR. This comparison will be performed by another physician of the research team, different from their FP after one year of follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of abdominal POCUS has been addressed in the hospital setting but not in PC. This lack of evidence can begin to be resolved with studies such as the one we present, designed for unselected populations such as those treated in PC and taking the patient's MR as the gold standard, which will allow us to make comparisons with the patient's clinical course.