恶性下腔静脉综合征下腔静脉支架植入术的抗血栓治疗:日本介入放射学研究小组(JIVROSG)问卷调查研究

Mizuki Ozawa, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Yasuaki Arai, Masahiko Kusumoto
{"title":"恶性下腔静脉综合征下腔静脉支架植入术的抗血栓治疗:日本介入放射学研究小组(JIVROSG)问卷调查研究","authors":"Mizuki Ozawa, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Yasuaki Arai, Masahiko Kusumoto","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in antithrombotic therapy policies for inferior vena cava (IVC) stent placement among institutions and interventional radiologists in Japan.\n Materials and Methods The cross-sectional online-based questionnaire was conducted between December 2022 and January 2023, and a total of 114 institutions were included in this study. The questionnaire contained eight questions that were grouped into three sections: (1) whether IVC stents have been performed or not, (2) the number of IVC stent placements, and (3) the basic strategy of antithrombotic therapy for pre-, intra-, and post-IVC stent placement.\n Results Of the 114 institutions, 38 responses (33%) were collected. Twenty-four of the 38 institutions (63%) had performed IVC stent placement during the study period. The mean number of IVC stent placements during the study period was 3.4 cases per institution. The most frequently selected antithrombotic therapeutic strategies pre-, intra-, and post-stenting were no antithrombotic therapy (62.5%), anticoagulation therapy (54.2%), and no antithrombotic therapy (41.7%).\n Conclusion This study has revealed there is no consensus regarding antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement in Japan. The results of this study may contribute to our understanding of the status of antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement. Future prospective studies are warranted to clarify the periprocedural antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement.","PeriodicalId":507357,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":" March","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antithrombotic Therapy for Inferior Vena Cava Stenting of Malignant Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Questionnaire Study of Japan Interventional Radiology Study Group (JIVROSG)\",\"authors\":\"Mizuki Ozawa, M. Sone, S. Sugawara, Yasuaki Arai, Masahiko Kusumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1782693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in antithrombotic therapy policies for inferior vena cava (IVC) stent placement among institutions and interventional radiologists in Japan.\\n Materials and Methods The cross-sectional online-based questionnaire was conducted between December 2022 and January 2023, and a total of 114 institutions were included in this study. The questionnaire contained eight questions that were grouped into three sections: (1) whether IVC stents have been performed or not, (2) the number of IVC stent placements, and (3) the basic strategy of antithrombotic therapy for pre-, intra-, and post-IVC stent placement.\\n Results Of the 114 institutions, 38 responses (33%) were collected. Twenty-four of the 38 institutions (63%) had performed IVC stent placement during the study period. The mean number of IVC stent placements during the study period was 3.4 cases per institution. The most frequently selected antithrombotic therapeutic strategies pre-, intra-, and post-stenting were no antithrombotic therapy (62.5%), anticoagulation therapy (54.2%), and no antithrombotic therapy (41.7%).\\n Conclusion This study has revealed there is no consensus regarding antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement in Japan. The results of this study may contribute to our understanding of the status of antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement. Future prospective studies are warranted to clarify the periprocedural antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" March\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估日本不同机构和介入放射医师在下腔静脉(IVC)支架置入术中抗血栓治疗政策的差异。材料与方法 在 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 1 月期间进行了横断面在线问卷调查,共有 114 家机构被纳入本研究。问卷包含 8 个问题,分为三个部分:(1)是否进行过 IVC 支架置入;(2)IVC 支架置入的次数;(3)IVC 支架置入前、置入中和置入后抗血栓治疗的基本策略。结果 在 114 家机构中,共收集到 38 份回复(33%)。38 家机构中有 24 家(63%)在研究期间进行过 IVC 支架置入术。在研究期间,每家机构平均植入 3.4 个 IVC 支架。支架置入前、置入中和置入后最常选择的抗血栓治疗策略分别是无抗血栓治疗(62.5%)、抗凝治疗(54.2%)和无抗血栓治疗(41.7%)。结论 本研究表明,日本对 IVC 支架置入术的抗血栓治疗尚未达成共识。本研究的结果有助于我们了解 IVC 支架置入术的抗血栓治疗现状。今后有必要开展前瞻性研究,以明确 IVC 支架置入术的围手术期抗血栓治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antithrombotic Therapy for Inferior Vena Cava Stenting of Malignant Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Questionnaire Study of Japan Interventional Radiology Study Group (JIVROSG)
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in antithrombotic therapy policies for inferior vena cava (IVC) stent placement among institutions and interventional radiologists in Japan. Materials and Methods The cross-sectional online-based questionnaire was conducted between December 2022 and January 2023, and a total of 114 institutions were included in this study. The questionnaire contained eight questions that were grouped into three sections: (1) whether IVC stents have been performed or not, (2) the number of IVC stent placements, and (3) the basic strategy of antithrombotic therapy for pre-, intra-, and post-IVC stent placement. Results Of the 114 institutions, 38 responses (33%) were collected. Twenty-four of the 38 institutions (63%) had performed IVC stent placement during the study period. The mean number of IVC stent placements during the study period was 3.4 cases per institution. The most frequently selected antithrombotic therapeutic strategies pre-, intra-, and post-stenting were no antithrombotic therapy (62.5%), anticoagulation therapy (54.2%), and no antithrombotic therapy (41.7%). Conclusion This study has revealed there is no consensus regarding antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement in Japan. The results of this study may contribute to our understanding of the status of antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement. Future prospective studies are warranted to clarify the periprocedural antithrombotic therapy for IVC stent placement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endovascular Treatment of Mycotic Aortic and Iliac Aneurysms in a Tertiary Center: A 15-Year Experience Simplifying Stem Cell Therapy for IRs: Exploring New Horizons in Interventional Radiology and Cell Therapy Antithrombotic Therapy for Inferior Vena Cava Stenting of Malignant Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Questionnaire Study of Japan Interventional Radiology Study Group (JIVROSG) Trans-splenic Approach for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis Outcome of Secondary Interval Rheolytic Thrombectomy after Localized Intra-Arterial Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis through Power-Pulse Spray Technique in Cases of Partially Successful or Failed Primary Rheolytic Thrombectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1