计算机肠鸣音分析与非侵入性设备对肠易激综合征的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。

Q2 Medicine Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.24920/004307
{"title":"计算机肠鸣音分析与非侵入性设备对肠易激综合征的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"","doi":"10.24920/004307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023. Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>), and plotted a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four studies were included. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.87–0.97), 0.89 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.81–0.94), 8.43 (95% <em>CI</em>, 4.81–14.78), 0.07 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.03–0.15), and 118.86 (95% <em>CI</em>, 44.18–319.75), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.95–0.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS. However, limited high-quality data make the results' validity and applicability questionable. There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":"39 2","pages":"Pages 122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Computerized Bowel Sound Analysis with Non-Invasive Devices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.24920/004307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023. Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>), and plotted a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four studies were included. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.87–0.97), 0.89 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.81–0.94), 8.43 (95% <em>CI</em>, 4.81–14.78), 0.07 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.03–0.15), and 118.86 (95% <em>CI</em>, 44.18–319.75), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% <em>CI</em>, 0.95–0.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS. However, limited high-quality data make the results' validity and applicability questionable. There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 122-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929424000257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929424000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过系统综述和荟萃分析评估肠易激综合征(IBS)肠鸣音分析的诊断准确性。方法 我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 IEEE Xplore 数据库,直至 2023 年 9 月。确定了肠鸣音分析对肠易激综合征诊断准确性的横断面研究和病例对照研究。我们估算了汇总的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比(含 95% 置信区间 (CI)),绘制了接收者操作特征曲线并评估了曲线下面积。结果 共纳入四项研究。汇总的诊断灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比分别为 0.94(95% CI,0.87-0.97)、0.89(95% CI,0.81-0.94)、8.43(95% CI,4.81-14.78)、0.07(95% CI,0.03-0.15)和 118.86(95% CI,44.18-319.75),曲线下面积为 0.97(95% CI,0.95-0.98)。结论 计算机肠鸣音分析是一种治疗肠易激综合征的有效工具。然而,由于高质量数据有限,其结果的有效性和适用性值得怀疑。需要进行更多的诊断测试准确性研究和更好的可穿戴设备来进行监测和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of Computerized Bowel Sound Analysis with Non-Invasive Devices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases until September 2023. Cross-sectional and case-control studies on diagnostic accuracy of bowel sound analysis for IBS were identified. We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and plotted a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and evaluated the area under the curve.

Results

Four studies were included. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81–0.94), 8.43 (95% CI, 4.81–14.78), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03–0.15), and 118.86 (95% CI, 44.18–319.75), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95–0.98).

Conclusions

Computerized bowel sound analysis is a promising tool for IBS. However, limited high-quality data make the results' validity and applicability questionable. There is a need for more diagnostic test accuracy studies and better wearable devices for monitoring and analysis of IBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
期刊最新文献
UBE2C as an Immune-Related Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Study Based on Multiple Databases Linggui Zhugan Decoction Improves High Glucose-Induced Autophagy in Podocytes Alignment Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where do We Stand Today? Vascular Calcification: Where is the Cure? BILL Strategy: Points to Consider During the Performance and Interpretation of Critical Care Echocardiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1