欧洲的现状--以欧盟制作令和保全令为例,平衡刑事诉讼中的效率和保障

Karolina Kiejnich-Kruk
{"title":"欧洲的现状--以欧盟制作令和保全令为例,平衡刑事诉讼中的效率和保障","authors":"Karolina Kiejnich-Kruk","doi":"10.1177/20322844241247482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Union (EU) legislative actions in the area of criminal proceedings focus on the improvement of the safeguards and procedural guarantees of suspects and the accused (e.g., Roadmap directives) as well as on enhancing the efficiency of criminal proceedings with the aim of effective prosecution and crime prevention. The newest examples of the latter are EU Production and Preservation Orders in criminal matters (EPOs). The Author analyses the relation between the EU safeguards and the fundamental rights of the suspects and the accused and the EPO regulation. The Author shows incoherences that occur in this field, especially regarding the right to an effective remedy and the right to information, proposing amendments in these fields.","PeriodicalId":508076,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","volume":"137 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quo vadis Europa—balancing between efficiency and guarantees in criminal proceedings using the example of EU production and preservation orders\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Kiejnich-Kruk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20322844241247482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"European Union (EU) legislative actions in the area of criminal proceedings focus on the improvement of the safeguards and procedural guarantees of suspects and the accused (e.g., Roadmap directives) as well as on enhancing the efficiency of criminal proceedings with the aim of effective prosecution and crime prevention. The newest examples of the latter are EU Production and Preservation Orders in criminal matters (EPOs). The Author analyses the relation between the EU safeguards and the fundamental rights of the suspects and the accused and the EPO regulation. The Author shows incoherences that occur in this field, especially regarding the right to an effective remedy and the right to information, proposing amendments in these fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"137 36\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241247482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241247482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲联盟(欧盟)在刑事诉讼领域的立法行动侧重于改善对嫌疑人和被告人的保障措施和程序保证(如路线图指令),以及提高刑事诉讼的效率,以实现有效起诉和预防犯罪的目的。后者的最新实例是欧盟刑事事项制作令和保全令(EPOs)。作者分析了欧盟对嫌疑人和被告人基本权利的保障措施与 EPO 条例之间的关系。作者指出了这一领域中出现的不一致之处,特别是在有效补救权和知情权方面,并提出了在这些领域中的修订建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quo vadis Europa—balancing between efficiency and guarantees in criminal proceedings using the example of EU production and preservation orders
European Union (EU) legislative actions in the area of criminal proceedings focus on the improvement of the safeguards and procedural guarantees of suspects and the accused (e.g., Roadmap directives) as well as on enhancing the efficiency of criminal proceedings with the aim of effective prosecution and crime prevention. The newest examples of the latter are EU Production and Preservation Orders in criminal matters (EPOs). The Author analyses the relation between the EU safeguards and the fundamental rights of the suspects and the accused and the EPO regulation. The Author shows incoherences that occur in this field, especially regarding the right to an effective remedy and the right to information, proposing amendments in these fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The non-punishment of human trafficking victims in Europe: A comparative perspective Cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters: The new EU legislation and the consolidation of a paradigm shift in the area of ‘judicial’ cooperation Exceptions to the Ne Bis in Idem Principle in the Context of Articles 54 and 55(1)(b) CISA and Compatibility of Declarations Not to be Bound by that Principle with Articles 50 and 52(1) CFREU Quo vadis Europa—balancing between efficiency and guarantees in criminal proceedings using the example of EU production and preservation orders Double criminality and the European Arrest Warrant: current trends and future developments in light of the KL case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1