{"title":"对公司被告的量刑:科威特法律与英国法律的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.62271/pjc.16.2.169.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study began with the hypothesis that British law has an advantage in\nregulation over Kuwaiti law regarding penalties related to companies or legal\npersons. This study raised several questions regarding several penalties and\nmeasures (fines, compensation orders, corrective orders, restitution orders,\npublication orders, Judicial rulings, submitting periodic financial reports, and\ndismissing company directors). To answer its questions, this study used the\nanalytical approach by analyzing the texts of British law and how they are applied\nbefore the courts. The study compared that with the texts currently existing in the\nKuwaiti legal system and the extent to which the penalties found in British law\ncan be applied. In the State of Kuwait. Indeed, it became clear from this study that\nthere is an advantage, but it is partial. This study found that there are penalties\nregulated by the British legislator that the Kuwaiti legislator did not know about,\nand there are penalties regulated by the British legislator in a more detailed and\ndeeper manner than Kuwaiti law in a manner consistent with the nature of the\nlegal person (companies). Finally, the study concluded that the Kuwaiti legislator\nshould benefit from the experience of the British legislator about criminal\ncorporate penalties.","PeriodicalId":516769,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentencing Corporate Defendants: A Comparative Study among Kuwaiti and Britain Law\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.62271/pjc.16.2.169.188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study began with the hypothesis that British law has an advantage in\\nregulation over Kuwaiti law regarding penalties related to companies or legal\\npersons. This study raised several questions regarding several penalties and\\nmeasures (fines, compensation orders, corrective orders, restitution orders,\\npublication orders, Judicial rulings, submitting periodic financial reports, and\\ndismissing company directors). To answer its questions, this study used the\\nanalytical approach by analyzing the texts of British law and how they are applied\\nbefore the courts. The study compared that with the texts currently existing in the\\nKuwaiti legal system and the extent to which the penalties found in British law\\ncan be applied. In the State of Kuwait. Indeed, it became clear from this study that\\nthere is an advantage, but it is partial. This study found that there are penalties\\nregulated by the British legislator that the Kuwaiti legislator did not know about,\\nand there are penalties regulated by the British legislator in a more detailed and\\ndeeper manner than Kuwaiti law in a manner consistent with the nature of the\\nlegal person (companies). Finally, the study concluded that the Kuwaiti legislator\\nshould benefit from the experience of the British legislator about criminal\\ncorporate penalties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.169.188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.169.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sentencing Corporate Defendants: A Comparative Study among Kuwaiti and Britain Law
This study began with the hypothesis that British law has an advantage in
regulation over Kuwaiti law regarding penalties related to companies or legal
persons. This study raised several questions regarding several penalties and
measures (fines, compensation orders, corrective orders, restitution orders,
publication orders, Judicial rulings, submitting periodic financial reports, and
dismissing company directors). To answer its questions, this study used the
analytical approach by analyzing the texts of British law and how they are applied
before the courts. The study compared that with the texts currently existing in the
Kuwaiti legal system and the extent to which the penalties found in British law
can be applied. In the State of Kuwait. Indeed, it became clear from this study that
there is an advantage, but it is partial. This study found that there are penalties
regulated by the British legislator that the Kuwaiti legislator did not know about,
and there are penalties regulated by the British legislator in a more detailed and
deeper manner than Kuwaiti law in a manner consistent with the nature of the
legal person (companies). Finally, the study concluded that the Kuwaiti legislator
should benefit from the experience of the British legislator about criminal
corporate penalties.