感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病孕妇的中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和血小板-淋巴细胞比率

Lebechukwu, B.C., Mbachu, N.A., Eleje, G.U., Orji, E. C., Obiegbu, N.P., Umennadi, R.O
{"title":"感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病孕妇的中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和血小板-淋巴细胞比率","authors":"Lebechukwu, B.C., Mbachu, N.A., Eleje, G.U., Orji, E. C., Obiegbu, N.P., Umennadi, R.O","doi":"10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). \nAim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR). \nMaterials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR. \nResults: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index. \nConclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.","PeriodicalId":8498,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil-lymphocyte and Platelet-lymphocyte Ratios of Pregnant Women Living with HIV/AIDS\",\"authors\":\"Lebechukwu, B.C., Mbachu, N.A., Eleje, G.U., Orji, E. C., Obiegbu, N.P., Umennadi, R.O\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). \\nAim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR). \\nMaterials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR. \\nResults: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index. \\nConclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性炎症是导致高死亡率的一个因素,感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的妇女在整个孕期都存在慢性炎症。目的:为了确定是妊娠本身还是 HIV 和妊娠的共同作用导致了炎症,本研究评估了炎症、淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)的预测变量。材料与方法将 128 名 15-49 岁的女性分为 4 组:A 组--32 名 HIV 阳性且怀孕;B 组--32 名 HIV 阴性且怀孕;C 组--32 名 HIV 阳性未怀孕;D 组--32 名 HIV 阴性未怀孕(对照组)。采用白细胞和血小板计数差法测定中性粒细胞(N)、淋巴细胞(L)和血小板(P)计数。采用比值计算法得出 NLR 和 PLR。结果A 组(2.62±0.41)的 NLR 明显高于 B 组(2.25±0.18)、C 组(0.95±0.07)和 D 组(1.68±0.19),P≤0.00。然而,A 组和 B 组的 NLR(p ≤ 0.05)无显著差异,A 组的 PLR(9.86±1.12)显著高于 B 组(6.65±1.12);C 组(5.35±0.47);D 组(6.34±0.43)。各组的血压没有明显差异,但体重指数有明显差异。结论因此,炎症可能仅由妊娠引起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neutrophil-lymphocyte and Platelet-lymphocyte Ratios of Pregnant Women Living with HIV/AIDS
Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Aim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR). Materials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR. Results: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index. Conclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Eleophorbia drupifera Leaves Extract on Some Biochemical and Haematological Parameters of Albino Rats Genetic Differentiation of Indian Zebu Cattle (Bos tauraus) Breeds Using Random Oligonucleotide Primers (RAPD-PCR) in Amravati Region, Maharashtra, India Antimicrobial Resistance and Phenotypic Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase in Escherichia coli from Children with Cases of Diarrhea in Nasarawa-South, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Emerging Role of Probiotics in Advancement of Combating Physical Abnormalities and Diseases: A Systematic Perspective Analysis Spectral Characterization of Canarium ovatum Engl. (Pili) Pulp Extract from Allen, Northern Samar, Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1