需要肾脏替代疗法的多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗效果

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Renal Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.34172/jrip.2024.32105
Aruni Ratnayake, Mukunthan Srikantharajah, Simon Stern, David Makanjuola
{"title":"需要肾脏替代疗法的多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗效果","authors":"Aruni Ratnayake, Mukunthan Srikantharajah, Simon Stern, David Makanjuola","doi":"10.34172/jrip.2024.32105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Renal impairment is a recognised complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib and dexamethasone are used as first line therapy but are associated with important side effects. Objectives: We investigated outcomes of patients with MM requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), assessed renal and haematological responses, and compared effects of different chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study of 67 patients with MM with associated renal impairment managed at our centre from 2007–2017. Approximately 29 patients required RRT and were included in the final analysis. Results: Bortezomib was administered to treat 65.5% patients; overall response rate was 84.2% (complete 21.1%, partial 63.1%). The remaining patients were treated with other agents; of these 50% responded to therapy, all with partial response. Bortezomib was associated with improved survival (P=0.02), however a higher proportion of patients experienced side effects (P=0.02). Of the patients who received bortezomib, 47% came off RRT, compared to 10% of patients who did not (P=0.04). Independence from RRT had the best association with survival (P=0.07). Patients who came off RRT had significant reduction in serum free light chains after two cycles of chemotherapy; those remaining dialysis-dependent showed variable changes in free light chain levels (P=0.02). Conclusion: Bortezomib treatment resulted in a significant improvement in survival, albeit with more side effects. Gaining independence from RRT was associated with better patient survival. A greater degree of reduction of free light chains corresponded to an increased likelihood of being independent of dialysis; this could be used as a marker for renal recovery and overall prognosis.","PeriodicalId":16950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcomes of multiple myeloma in patients requiring renal replacement therapy\",\"authors\":\"Aruni Ratnayake, Mukunthan Srikantharajah, Simon Stern, David Makanjuola\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jrip.2024.32105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Renal impairment is a recognised complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib and dexamethasone are used as first line therapy but are associated with important side effects. Objectives: We investigated outcomes of patients with MM requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), assessed renal and haematological responses, and compared effects of different chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study of 67 patients with MM with associated renal impairment managed at our centre from 2007–2017. Approximately 29 patients required RRT and were included in the final analysis. Results: Bortezomib was administered to treat 65.5% patients; overall response rate was 84.2% (complete 21.1%, partial 63.1%). The remaining patients were treated with other agents; of these 50% responded to therapy, all with partial response. Bortezomib was associated with improved survival (P=0.02), however a higher proportion of patients experienced side effects (P=0.02). Of the patients who received bortezomib, 47% came off RRT, compared to 10% of patients who did not (P=0.04). Independence from RRT had the best association with survival (P=0.07). Patients who came off RRT had significant reduction in serum free light chains after two cycles of chemotherapy; those remaining dialysis-dependent showed variable changes in free light chain levels (P=0.02). Conclusion: Bortezomib treatment resulted in a significant improvement in survival, albeit with more side effects. Gaining independence from RRT was associated with better patient survival. A greater degree of reduction of free light chains corresponded to an increased likelihood of being independent of dialysis; this could be used as a marker for renal recovery and overall prognosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrip.2024.32105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrip.2024.32105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介肾功能损害是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)公认的并发症之一。硼替佐米(Bortezomib)和地塞米松(Dexamethasone)被用作一线疗法,但它们也有一些重要的副作用。研究目的我们调查了需要肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的 MM 患者的预后,评估了肾脏和血液学反应,并比较了不同化疗方案的效果。患者和方法回顾性研究:2007-2017年期间在本中心接受治疗的67例伴有肾功能损害的MM患者。约 29 名患者需要接受 RRT 治疗,并纳入最终分析。研究结果65.5%的患者接受了硼替佐米治疗;总体应答率为84.2%(完全应答21.1%,部分应答63.1%)。其余患者接受了其他药物治疗;其中50%的患者对治疗有反应,全部为部分反应。硼替佐米与生存率的提高有关(P=0.02),但出现副作用的患者比例较高(P=0.02)。在接受硼替佐米治疗的患者中,47%的患者不再接受 RRT 治疗,而未接受 RRT 治疗的患者中只有 10%的患者不再接受 RRT 治疗(P=0.04)。脱离 RRT 与存活率的关系最好(P=0.07)。脱离RRT的患者在两个化疗周期后血清游离轻链显著减少;仍依赖透析的患者游离轻链水平变化不一(P=0.02)。结论硼替佐米治疗显著提高了患者的生存率,尽管副作用较多。独立于 RRT 与患者生存率的提高有关。游离轻链减少的程度越大,患者独立于透析的可能性就越大;这可作为肾功能恢复和总体预后的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment outcomes of multiple myeloma in patients requiring renal replacement therapy
Introduction: Renal impairment is a recognised complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib and dexamethasone are used as first line therapy but are associated with important side effects. Objectives: We investigated outcomes of patients with MM requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), assessed renal and haematological responses, and compared effects of different chemotherapy regimens. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study of 67 patients with MM with associated renal impairment managed at our centre from 2007–2017. Approximately 29 patients required RRT and were included in the final analysis. Results: Bortezomib was administered to treat 65.5% patients; overall response rate was 84.2% (complete 21.1%, partial 63.1%). The remaining patients were treated with other agents; of these 50% responded to therapy, all with partial response. Bortezomib was associated with improved survival (P=0.02), however a higher proportion of patients experienced side effects (P=0.02). Of the patients who received bortezomib, 47% came off RRT, compared to 10% of patients who did not (P=0.04). Independence from RRT had the best association with survival (P=0.07). Patients who came off RRT had significant reduction in serum free light chains after two cycles of chemotherapy; those remaining dialysis-dependent showed variable changes in free light chain levels (P=0.02). Conclusion: Bortezomib treatment resulted in a significant improvement in survival, albeit with more side effects. Gaining independence from RRT was associated with better patient survival. A greater degree of reduction of free light chains corresponded to an increased likelihood of being independent of dialysis; this could be used as a marker for renal recovery and overall prognosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Injury Prevention
Journal of Renal Injury Prevention UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Injury Prevention (JRIP) is a quarterly peer-reviewed international journal devoted to the promotion of early diagnosis and prevention of renal diseases. It publishes in March, June, September and December of each year. It has pursued this aim through publishing editorials, original research articles, reviews, mini-reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, hypothesis, case reports, epidemiology and prevention, news and views and renal biopsy teaching point. In this journal, particular emphasis is given to research, both experimental and clinical, aimed at protection/prevention of renal failure and modalities in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. A further aim of this journal is to emphasize and strengthen the link between renal pathologists/nephropathologists and nephrologists. In addition, JRIP welcomes basic biomedical as well as pharmaceutical scientific research applied to clinical nephrology. Futuristic conceptual hypothesis that integrate various fields of acute kidney injury and renal tubular cell protection are encouraged to be submitted.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between contrast-induced nephropathy and blood methemoglobin levels in acute coronary syndrome patients Predictors of glomerular IgA immunostaining patterns and disease progression in IgA nephropathy patients; a 13-year study of clinical and morphological features of renal biopsies A comparative study of true and pseudo-peroxidase and their relative biomarkers between male and female patients with chronic kidney disease Association between cadmium exposure and risk of chronic kidney disease; a systematic review and meta-analysis Treatment outcomes of multiple myeloma in patients requiring renal replacement therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1