共创解决方案和应用共创的三个 "Co "框架

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1108/he-09-2022-0077
Gemma Pearce, Paul Magee
{"title":"共创解决方案和应用共创的三个 \"Co \"框架","authors":"Gemma Pearce, Paul Magee","doi":"10.1108/he-09-2022-0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeA sense of collective free-thinking with tangible goals makes co-creation an enlightening experience. Yet despite the freedom and organic flow of the methodology, there remain barriers to deploying co-creation in the real-world context. The aim was to understand the barriers and solutions to co-creation, reflect on applying co-creation in practice and co-create an applicable framework for co-creation.Design/methodology/approachThese reflections and conceptual developments were completed using a Participatory Action Research Approach through the co-creation of the Erasmus+ funded Co-creating Welfare course.FindingsResults presented are centric to the experiences in the United Kingdom but led to application at an international level. Problem formulation led to solutions devised about who should co-create, what co-creation aims to achieve, how to receive management buy-in, co-creating beyond the local face to face context and evaluation.Originality/valueThe Three Co’s Framework is proposed using the outline of: Co-Define, Co-Design and Co-Refine. Those who take part in co-creation processes are recommended to be called co-creators, with less focus on “empowerment” and more about facilitating people to harness the power they already have. Utilising online and hybrid delivery methods can be more inclusive, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of co-creation needs to be evaluated more moving forwards, as well as the output co-created.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Pearce, Paul Magee\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/he-09-2022-0077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeA sense of collective free-thinking with tangible goals makes co-creation an enlightening experience. Yet despite the freedom and organic flow of the methodology, there remain barriers to deploying co-creation in the real-world context. The aim was to understand the barriers and solutions to co-creation, reflect on applying co-creation in practice and co-create an applicable framework for co-creation.Design/methodology/approachThese reflections and conceptual developments were completed using a Participatory Action Research Approach through the co-creation of the Erasmus+ funded Co-creating Welfare course.FindingsResults presented are centric to the experiences in the United Kingdom but led to application at an international level. Problem formulation led to solutions devised about who should co-create, what co-creation aims to achieve, how to receive management buy-in, co-creating beyond the local face to face context and evaluation.Originality/valueThe Three Co’s Framework is proposed using the outline of: Co-Define, Co-Design and Co-Refine. Those who take part in co-creation processes are recommended to be called co-creators, with less focus on “empowerment” and more about facilitating people to harness the power they already have. Utilising online and hybrid delivery methods can be more inclusive, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of co-creation needs to be evaluated more moving forwards, as well as the output co-created.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/he-09-2022-0077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/he-09-2022-0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 共同创造是一种具有切实目标的集体自由思考方式,是一种富有启发性的体验。然而,尽管这种方法自由而有机,但在现实世界中运用共同创造仍然存在障碍。我们的目的是了解共同创造的障碍和解决方案,反思共同创造在实践中的应用,并共同创建一个适用的共同创造框架。设计/方法/途径通过共同创建伊拉斯谟+资助的 "共同创造福利 "课程,采用参与式行动研究方法完成了这些反思和概念开发。在提出问题后,就以下方面制定了解决方案:谁应该共同创造、共同创造的目标是什么、如何获得管理层的支持、超越本地面对面环境的共同创造以及评估:共同定义、共同设计和共同完善。建议将参与共同创造过程的人称为共同创造者,减少对 "赋权 "的关注,更多地促进人们利用他们已有的力量。利用在线和混合交付方法可以更具包容性,特别是在应对 COVID-19 大流行病时。今后需要更多地评估共同创造的使用情况以及共同创造的产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-creation solutions and the three Co’s framework for applying Co-creation
PurposeA sense of collective free-thinking with tangible goals makes co-creation an enlightening experience. Yet despite the freedom and organic flow of the methodology, there remain barriers to deploying co-creation in the real-world context. The aim was to understand the barriers and solutions to co-creation, reflect on applying co-creation in practice and co-create an applicable framework for co-creation.Design/methodology/approachThese reflections and conceptual developments were completed using a Participatory Action Research Approach through the co-creation of the Erasmus+ funded Co-creating Welfare course.FindingsResults presented are centric to the experiences in the United Kingdom but led to application at an international level. Problem formulation led to solutions devised about who should co-create, what co-creation aims to achieve, how to receive management buy-in, co-creating beyond the local face to face context and evaluation.Originality/valueThe Three Co’s Framework is proposed using the outline of: Co-Define, Co-Design and Co-Refine. Those who take part in co-creation processes are recommended to be called co-creators, with less focus on “empowerment” and more about facilitating people to harness the power they already have. Utilising online and hybrid delivery methods can be more inclusive, especially in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of co-creation needs to be evaluated more moving forwards, as well as the output co-created.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
期刊最新文献
“Oh … that Mommy needs a bit of help as well”: why every school needs a health and wellbeing lead “It’s expected that students want to get drunk. that needs to change”: alcohol abstainer and light drinking university student experiences Balancing diets: diverse values shaping sustainable food choices Promoting equity and social justice: analysing the global impact of educational laws on sex education in Spain and the United Kingdom Developing new healthcare practice learning environments through a third-space reflective practice approach: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1