非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中无触摸静脉采集技术的学习曲线。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1159/000538602
Yuguang Ge, Lin Xia, Luxi Wang, Zhonglu Yang, Yuji Zhang, Yejun Du, Entao Zhou, Hui Jiang
{"title":"非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中无触摸静脉采集技术的学习曲线。","authors":"Yuguang Ge, Lin Xia, Luxi Wang, Zhonglu Yang, Yuji Zhang, Yejun Du, Entao Zhou, Hui Jiang","doi":"10.1159/000538602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThis study aims to evaluate the learning curve associated with the no-touch vein harvesting technique in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), highlighting its impact on surgical proficiency.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe employed logarithmic curve fitting to analyze the learning curves of 160 patients undergoing no-touch CABG, with a detailed retrospective examination of 89 patients who received three grafts using Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis. Patients were categorized into two phases: the initial learning phase and the subsequent mastery phase, based on the chronological order of surgeries. We then compared perioperative outcomes between these phases.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe learning curve for the no-touch vein harvesting technique was quantitatively established at 51 cases via CUSUM analysis, with supporting evidence from logarithmic curve fitting indicating a significant proficiency milestone. In the mastery phase, median operative times, aorta-saphenous vein graft (SVG) anastomosis, and SVG inspection durations were notably reduced (230 vs. 250 minutes, P = 0.002; 11.5 vs. 13.0 minutes, P = 0.025; 9.0 vs. 11.0 minutes, P = 0.002, respectively), alongside decreased initial 48-hour chest tube drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and fewer incidences of delayed leg incision healing compared to the learning phase [312.6 (140.7) ml vs. 401.0 (233.5) ml, P = 0.029; 11.0 d vs. 12.0 d, P = 0.026; 15.7% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.043)].\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCardiac surgeons adopting the full-incision SVG harvesting method for no-touch CABG undergo a discernible learning curve before achieving early proficiency. It is crucial, especially during the initial learning phase, to focus on aorta-SVG anastomosis, the meticulous inspection for bleeding, and the management of wound complications to optimize patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Curve for No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Yuguang Ge, Lin Xia, Luxi Wang, Zhonglu Yang, Yuji Zhang, Yejun Du, Entao Zhou, Hui Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nThis study aims to evaluate the learning curve associated with the no-touch vein harvesting technique in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), highlighting its impact on surgical proficiency.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe employed logarithmic curve fitting to analyze the learning curves of 160 patients undergoing no-touch CABG, with a detailed retrospective examination of 89 patients who received three grafts using Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis. Patients were categorized into two phases: the initial learning phase and the subsequent mastery phase, based on the chronological order of surgeries. We then compared perioperative outcomes between these phases.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe learning curve for the no-touch vein harvesting technique was quantitatively established at 51 cases via CUSUM analysis, with supporting evidence from logarithmic curve fitting indicating a significant proficiency milestone. In the mastery phase, median operative times, aorta-saphenous vein graft (SVG) anastomosis, and SVG inspection durations were notably reduced (230 vs. 250 minutes, P = 0.002; 11.5 vs. 13.0 minutes, P = 0.025; 9.0 vs. 11.0 minutes, P = 0.002, respectively), alongside decreased initial 48-hour chest tube drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and fewer incidences of delayed leg incision healing compared to the learning phase [312.6 (140.7) ml vs. 401.0 (233.5) ml, P = 0.029; 11.0 d vs. 12.0 d, P = 0.026; 15.7% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.043)].\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nCardiac surgeons adopting the full-incision SVG harvesting method for no-touch CABG undergo a discernible learning curve before achieving early proficiency. It is crucial, especially during the initial learning phase, to focus on aorta-SVG anastomosis, the meticulous inspection for bleeding, and the management of wound complications to optimize patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 我们采用对数曲线拟合法分析了 160 名接受无接触式 CABG 患者的学习曲线,并使用累积总和(CUSUM)分析法对接受三次移植物的 89 名患者进行了详细的回顾性检查。根据手术的时间顺序,将患者分为两个阶段:最初的学习阶段和随后的掌握阶段。结果通过 CUSUM 分析,无接触静脉采集技术的学习曲线定量为 51 例,对数曲线拟合的支持证据表明这是一个重要的熟练里程碑。与学习阶段相比,掌握阶段的中位手术时间、主动脉-奇静脉移植物(SVG)吻合时间和 SVG 检查时间明显缩短(分别为 230 分钟对 250 分钟,P = 0.002;11.5 分钟对 13.0 分钟,P = 0.025;9.0 分钟对 11.0 分钟,P = 0.002),同时初始 48 小时胸管引流减少,术后住院时间缩短,腿部切口延迟愈合发生率降低 [312.结论采用全切口 SVG 采集方法进行无创 CABG 的心脏外科医生在达到早期熟练程度之前都要经历一个明显的学习曲线。尤其是在最初的学习阶段,重点关注主动脉与 SVG 的吻合、出血的细致检查以及伤口并发症的处理对优化患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning Curve for No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
INTRODUCTION This study aims to evaluate the learning curve associated with the no-touch vein harvesting technique in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), highlighting its impact on surgical proficiency. METHODS We employed logarithmic curve fitting to analyze the learning curves of 160 patients undergoing no-touch CABG, with a detailed retrospective examination of 89 patients who received three grafts using Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis. Patients were categorized into two phases: the initial learning phase and the subsequent mastery phase, based on the chronological order of surgeries. We then compared perioperative outcomes between these phases. RESULTS The learning curve for the no-touch vein harvesting technique was quantitatively established at 51 cases via CUSUM analysis, with supporting evidence from logarithmic curve fitting indicating a significant proficiency milestone. In the mastery phase, median operative times, aorta-saphenous vein graft (SVG) anastomosis, and SVG inspection durations were notably reduced (230 vs. 250 minutes, P = 0.002; 11.5 vs. 13.0 minutes, P = 0.025; 9.0 vs. 11.0 minutes, P = 0.002, respectively), alongside decreased initial 48-hour chest tube drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and fewer incidences of delayed leg incision healing compared to the learning phase [312.6 (140.7) ml vs. 401.0 (233.5) ml, P = 0.029; 11.0 d vs. 12.0 d, P = 0.026; 15.7% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.043)]. CONCLUSION Cardiac surgeons adopting the full-incision SVG harvesting method for no-touch CABG undergo a discernible learning curve before achieving early proficiency. It is crucial, especially during the initial learning phase, to focus on aorta-SVG anastomosis, the meticulous inspection for bleeding, and the management of wound complications to optimize patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Disease: Perspectives on Disparities in Women's Treatment and Outcomes. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation for pediatric paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Floppy Mitral Valve/Mitral Valve Prolapse and Manifestations Not Related to Mitral Regurgitation: Time to Search the Dark Side of the Moon. Impact of an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program on cardiopulmonary test parameters. Prevalence and predictors of thromboembolic events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular thrombus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1